Environmental jolts are dramatic unexpected events that can seriously affect firm outcomes, yet little is known about how family firms may respond. Research indicates that they will seek to preserve their socioemotional wealth endowments when these are threatened; less clear is how or why they may differ in this process. Drawing on the same environmental jolt this study investigates their behavioral response. It finds they engage to different extents in behavior labeled as engagement intensification, which engenders increasing risk for their business. While there are differences in family firms’ socioemotional wealth these do not sufficiently explain differences in their behavioral response.
AmbosT. C.BirkinshawJ. (2010). How do new ventures evolve? An inductive study of archetype changes in science-based ventures. Organization Science, 21, 1125-1140.
2.
AshworthG. J. (1994). From history to heritage—From heritage to identity: In search of concepts and models. In AshworthG. J.LarkhamP. J. (Eds.), Building a new heritage: Tourism, culture and identity in the new Europe (pp. 13-30). Oxford, England: Routledge.
3.
AstrachanJ. (2003). The emergence of a field. Journal Business Venturing, 18, 567-572.
4.
BansalP.RothK. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717-736.
5.
BaronD. P.DiermeierD. (2007). Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 599-634.
6.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
7.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R.Larraza-KintanaM. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 82-113.
8.
BillingsR.MilburnT.SchaalmanM. (1980). A model of crisis perception: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 300-316.
9.
CennamoC.BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1153-1173.
10.
ChrismanJ.ChuaJ.SharmaP. (2003). Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm. Coleman White Paper Series, 4, 1-63.
11.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
12.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA. (2015). A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 173-182.
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
14.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ.ChrismanJ. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 344-364.
15.
DixitA.SkeathS. (1999). Games of strategy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
16.
DyeA.SicotteR. (2006). How brinkmanship saved Chadbourne: Credibility and the International Sugar Agreement of 1931. Explorations in Economic History, 43, 223-256.
17.
DyerW. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19, 253-273.
18.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
19.
ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442-476.
20.
GollI.RasheedA. A. (2011). Environmental jolts, clocks, and strategic change in the U.S. airline industry: The effects of deregulation and the 9/11/2001 terrorist attacks. Business and Politics, 13(4), 1-37.
21.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CampbellJ. T.MartinG.HoskissonR. E.MakriM.SirmonD. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1351-1374.
22.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
23.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK.Nuñez-NickelM.JacobsonK.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
24.
GrahamB.HowardP. (2008). Heritage and identity. In GrahamB. J.HowardP. (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 1-15). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
25.
GreiderT.GarkovichL. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and environment. Rural Sociology, 59, 1-24.
26.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
27.
JickT. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative Methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
28.
JonesC.LichtensteinB. B. (2008). Temporary interorganizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 231-255). London, England: Oxford University Press.
29.
KahnJ. A.HendersonD. A. (1992). Location preferences of family firms: Strategic decision making or “home sweet home”?Family Business Review, 5, 271-282.
30.
Kets de VriesM. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21, 59-71.
31.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.
32.
LiuT.-H.HungS.-C.ChuY.-Y. (2007). Environmental jolts, entrepreneurial actions and value creation: A case study of Trend Micro. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1432-1445.
33.
LowS. M.AltmanI. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In LowS. M.AltmanI. (Eds.), Place attachment: Human behavior and environment (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
34.
ManzoL. C.PerkinsD. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 335-350.
MeyerA. D.BrooksG. R.GoesJ. B. (1990). Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 93-110.
37.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 713-720.
39.
MillerD.SteierL.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
40.
NaldiL.CennamoC.CorbettaG.Gómez-MejíaL. (2013). Preserving socioemotional wealth in family firms: Asset or liability? The moderating role of business context. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37, 1341-1360.
41.
NalebuffB. (1986). Brinkmanship and nuclear deterrence: The neutrality of escalation. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 9(2), 19-30.
42.
Pérez-NordtvedtL.KhavulS.HarrisonD. A.McGeeJ. E. (2014). Adaptation to temporal shocks: Influences of strategic interpretation and spatial distance. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 869-897.
43.
PowellR. (1988). Nuclear brinkmanship with two-sided incomplete information. American Political Science Review, 82, 155-155.
44.
SalvatoC.CorbettaG. (2013). Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26, 235-255.
45.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10.
46.
SchellingT. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
SchulzeW. S.KellermannsF. W. (2015). Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 447-459.
48.
SineW. D.DavidR. J. (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32, 185-207.
49.
StawB. M.SandelandsL. E.DuttonJ. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
50.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
van den BrinkM.BenschopY. (2014). Gender in academic networking: The role of gatekeepers in professorial recruitment. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 460-492.
52.
VaskeJ. J.KobrinK. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21.
53.
VenkataramanS.Van de VenA. H. (1998). Hostile environmental jolts transaction set, and new business. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 231-255.
54.
WanW. P.YiuD. W. (2009). From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 791-801.
55.
WilliamsD. R.VaskeJ. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830-840.
56.
WrightM.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2014). Family enterprise and context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1247-1260.
57.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
ZellwegerT. M.DehlenT. (2012). Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among family firm owners. Family Business Review, 25, 280-297.
59.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203-216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
