Incumbents’ attitude toward intrafamily succession (IFS) is a critical individual-level determinant of family firms’ IFS intention, which is, in turn, an important component of family business essence. Knowledge about its antecedents, however, is fragmented and very limited. Drawing on the theory of planned behavior and general attitude literature, hypotheses about the situational and individual antecedents of family firm incumbents’ attitude toward IFS were developed and tested with a sample of 274 Italian family firm incumbents. Results show that incumbents’ attitude toward IFS is indeed influenced by both situational and individual antecedents as well as by their interactions.
AdlerA. (1959). Understanding human nature. New York, NY: Premier.
2.
AgarwalJ.MalhotraN. K. (2005). An integrated model of attitude and affect: Theoretical foundation and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 58, 483-493.
3.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
4.
AjzenI. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.
5.
AjzenI. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
6.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
8.
AmoreM. D.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2011). How do managerial successions shape corporate financial policies in family firms?Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 1016-1027.
9.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
10.
BarachJ. A.GanitskyJ. B. (1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8, 131-155.
11.
BarnesL. B.HershonS. A. (1976). Transferring power in family business. Harvard Business Review, 54, 105-114.
12.
BeckhardR. (1975). Strategies for large system change. Sloan Management Review, 16, 43-56.
13.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Perez-GonzalezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.
14.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
15.
BertrandM.JohnsonS.SamphantharakK.SchoarA. (2008). Mixing family with business: A study of Thai business groups and the families behind them. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 466-498.
BodurH.BrinbergD.CoupeyE. (2000). Belief, affect, and attitude: Alternative models of the determinants of attitude. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(1), 17-28.
18.
BoivieS.LangeD.McDonaldM. L.WestphalJ. D. (2011). Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 551-576.
19.
BryantB. K. (1982). Sibling relationships in middle childhood. In LambM. E.Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 87-121). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20.
CannellaA. A.JonesC. D.WithersM. C. (2015). Family-versus lone-founder-controlled public corporations: Social identity theory and boards of directors. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 436-459.
21.
CarterS.RamM. (2003). Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21, 371-380.
22.
ChrismanJ. J. (1999). The influence of outsider-generated knowledge resources on venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(4), 42-58.
23.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.FrattiniF.WrightM. (2015). The willingness versus ability paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 310-318.
24.
ChrismanJ.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
25.
ChrismanJ. J.FangH.KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2015). A note on family influence and the adoption of discontinuous technologies in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 384-388.
26.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF.WuZ. Y. (2011). Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 472-488.
27.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
28.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103-1113.
29.
ChurchillN. C.HattenK. J. (1987). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 12, 53-66.
30.
ChurchillN. C.HattenK. J. (1997). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business. Family Business Review, 10, 53-67.
31.
ChurchillN. C.LewisV. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30-50.
32.
CicirelliV. G. (1982). Sibling influence throughout the lifespan. In LambM. E.Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 267-284). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
33.
ColomboM. G.De MassisA.PivaE.Rossi-LamastraC.WrightM. (2014). Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high-tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 226-245.
34.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.
DaspitJ. J.HoltD. T.ChrismanJ. J.LongR. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective a multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29, 44-64.
36.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1998). The influence of family on the family business succession process: A multi-generational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(3), 31-53.
37.
De MassisA. (2012). Family involvement and procedural justice climate among non-family managers: The effects of affect, social identities, trust and risk of non-reciprocity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1227-1234.
38.
De MassisA.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183-199.
39.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.CampopianoG.CassiaL. (2015). The impact of family involvement in SMEs’ performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 924-948.
40.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 344-364.
41.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.FrattiniF.PetruzelliA.WrightM. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 93-116.
42.
de VriesM. F. K. (1985). The darker side of entrepreneurship. Fontainebleau, France: INSEAD.
43.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 337-360.
44.
DehlenT.ZellwegerT.KammerlanderN.HalterF. (2014). The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routes. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 193-209.
45.
DessG. G.RobinsonR. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 265-273.
46.
DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143-162.
47.
DyerW. G. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.SarathyR. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 26-50.
49.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
50.
EkehammarB. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1026-1048.
51.
EmersonR. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
52.
EndlerN. S.MagnussonD. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956-974.
53.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
55.
FriedmanS. D. (1991). Sibling relationships and intergenerational succession in family firms. Family Business Review, 4, 3-20.
56.
GagnéM.SharmaP.De MassisA. (2014). The study of organizational behaviour in family business. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 643-656.
57.
HairJ. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
HairJ. F.BlackB.BabinB.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59.
HandlerW. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-51.
60.
HandlerW. C.KramK. E. (1988). Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance, Family Business Review, 1, 361-381.
61.
HarmanH. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
HoltD. T.RutherfordM. W.KuratkoD. F. (2010). Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review, 23, 76-88.
63.
IhingerM. (1975). The referee role and norms of equity: A contribution toward a theory of sibling conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 515-524.
64.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
65.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
66.
KamoY. (2000). Racial and ethnic differences in extended family households. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 211-229.
67.
KautonenT.van GelderenM.FinkM. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 655-674.
68.
KellyL. M.AthanassiouN.CrittendenW. F. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27-42.
69.
KoroppC.GrichnikD.GygaxA. F. (2013). Succession financing in family firms. Small Business Economics, 41, 315-334.
70.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.
71.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FangH.FrattiniF. (2014). Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43, 597-619.
72.
KruegerN.ReillyM. D.CarsrudA. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411-432.
73.
KumarN.SternL. W.AndersonJ. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1633-1651.
74.
LansbergI.AstrachanJ. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7, 39-59.
75.
LansbergI. S. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1, 119-143.
76.
LaspitaS.BreugstN.HeblichS.PatzeltH. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions, Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 414-435.
77.
LawlerE. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321-352.
78.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305-328.
79.
LevinsonH. (1971). Conflicts that plague family businesses. Harvard Business Review, 49(2), 90-98.
80.
LinanF.ChenY. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 593-617.
81.
LongR. G.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Management succession in family business. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 371-387). London, England: Sage.
82.
LubatkinM. H.DurandR.LingY. (2007). The missing lens in family firm governance theory: A self-other typology of parental altruism. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1022-1029.
83.
MarshallJ. P.SorensonR.BrighamK.WielingE.ReifmanA.WamplerR. S. (2006). The paradox for the family firm CEO: Owner age relationship to succession-related processes and plans. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 348-368.
84.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829-858.
85.
MinichilliA.CorbettaG.MacMillanI. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: “Familiness,” “faultlines,” and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 205-222.
86.
NordqvistM.SharmaP.ChiricoF. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and governance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 192-209.
87.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper Row.
88.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
89.
RichinsM. L. (1994). Valuing things: The public and private meaning of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 504-521.
90.
RoyerS.SimonsR.BoydB.RaffertyA. (2008). Promoting family: A contingency model of family business succession. Family Business Review, 21, 15-30.
91.
RubensonG. C.GuptaA. K. (1996). The initial succession: A contingency model of founder tenure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(2), 21-35.
92.
RutherfordM. W.KuratkoD. F.HoltD. T. (2008). Examining the link between “familiness” and performance: Can the F-PEC untangle the family business theory jungle?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1089-1109.
93.
ScheinE. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
94.
SchlaegelC.KoenigM. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 291-332.
95.
SchneiderB.ReichersA. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36(1), 19-39.
96.
SchroederE.Schmitt-RodermundE. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of adolescents’ motivations to join the family business. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 476-485.
97.
SchroederE.Schmitt-RodermundE.ArnaudN. (2011). Career choice intentions of adolescents with a family business background. Family Business Review, 24, 305-321.
98.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-490.
99.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
100.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16, 1-15.
101.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.PabloA. L.ChuaJ. H. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 1-19.
102.
SharmaP.HoyF.AstrachanJ. H.KoiranenM. (2007). The practice-driven evolution of family business education, Journal of Business Research, 60, 1012-1021.
103.
ShepherdD. (2016). An emotions perspective for advancing the fields of family business and entrepreneurship: Stocks, flows, reactions, and responses. Family Business Review, 29, 151-158.
104.
SiemsenE.RothA.OliveiraP. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456-476.
105.
SingalM.SingalV. (2011). Concentrated ownership and firm performance: Does family control matter?Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 373-396.
106.
SonnenfeldJ. A.SpenceP. L. (1989). The parting patriarch of a family firm. Family Business Review, 2, 355-375.
107.
StavrouE. T. (1999). Succession in family businesses: Exploring the effects of demographic factors on offspring intentions to join and take over the business. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 43-61.
108.
SteierL. P.WardJ. L. (2006). If theories of family enterprise really do matter, so does change in management education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 887-895.
109.
StulzR. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3-27.
110.
TerborgJ. R. (1981). Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 6, 569-576.
111.
TosiH. L.WernerS.KatzJ. P.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26, 301-339.
112.
UhlanerL. M.KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A.HoyF. (2012). The entrepreneuring family: A new paradigm for family business research: Introduction. Small Business Economics, 38, 1-11.
113.
VenterE.BoshoffC.MaasG. (2005). The influence of successor-related factors on the succession process in small and medium-sized family businesses. Family Business Review, 18, 283-303.
114.
Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2002). A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1011-1028.
115.
WardJ. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
116.
WennbergK.WiklundJ.HellerstedtK.NordqvistM. (2011). Implications of intra-family and external ownership transfer of family firms: Short-term and long-term performance differences. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 352-372.
117.
WestheadP.CowlingM. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 31-56.
118.
WiklundJ.NordqvistM.HellerstedtK.BirdM. (2013). Internal versus external ownership transition in family firms: An embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1319-1340.
119.
ZajoncR. B.MarkusH. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123-131.
120.
ZaleznikA.De VriesM. F. K. (1985). Power and the corporate mind. Fayetteville, PA: Bonus Books.
121.
ZellwegerT.AstrachanJ. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21, 347-363.
122.
ZellwegerT.SiegerP.HalterF. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 521-536.
123.
ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23, 851-868.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
