Drawing from agency theory and socioemotional wealth considerations, we evaluate the extent post-IPO investment policy choices and their economic consequences differ for family firms relative to nonfamily firms. Our results suggest that family firms underinvest in post-IPO liquidity, total investment spending, and R&D expenditures, relative to similar non-family firms. On the other hand, family firms overinvest in capital spending and underinvest in acquisition spending relative to nonfamily firms with dispersed but not concentrated ownership structures. Furthermore, while increases in R&D spending decrease shareholder value in family firms, the reverse is the case with acquisition spending.
AdamsR.AlmeidaH.FerreiraD. (2009). Understanding the relationship between founder CEOs and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16, 136-150.
2.
AmihudY.LevB. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 605-618.
3.
AndersonR. C.DuruA.ReebD. M. (2012). Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 1744-1758.
4.
AndersonR. C.MansiS. A.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263-285.
5.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1329.
6.
BatesT. W.KahleK.StulzR. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to?Journal of Finance, 64, 1985-2021.
7.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
8.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2003). Enjoying the quiet Life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1043-1075.
9.
CaprioL.CrociE.GiudiceA. D. (2011). Ownership structure, family control, and acquisition decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 1636-1657.
10.
CennamoC.BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36, 1153-1173.
11.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976-997.
12.
ClaessensS.DjankovS.LangL. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.
13.
ColesJ. L.NaveenD. D.NaveenL. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 431-468.
14.
DittmarA.Mahrt-SmithJ. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 599-634.
15.
EasterbrookF. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74, 650-659.
16.
FahlenbrachR. (2009). Founder-CEOs, investment decisions, and stock market performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 439-466.
17.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
18.
FamaE. F.FrenchK. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153-193.
19.
FaulkenderM.WangR. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. Journal of Finance, 66, 1957-1990.
20.
FisherH. M.PollockT. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 463-481.
21.
FrésardL. (2010). Financial strength and product market behavior: The real effects of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Finance, 64, 1097-1122.
22.
GaoN.JainB. (2011). Founder CEO management and the long-run investment performance of IPO firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1669-1682.
23.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK. T.Nunez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
24.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
25.
HarfordJ.MansiS. A.MaxwellW. F. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 535-555.
26.
HoldernessC. G.SheehanD. P. (1988). The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 317-346.
27.
HolmstromB.CostaJ. (1986). Managerial incentives and capital management. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 835-860.
JainB. A.KiniO. (2000). Does the presence of venture capitalists improve the survival profile of IPO firms?Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 27, 1139-1176.
30.
JainB. A.KiniO. (2008). The impact of strategic investment choices on post-issue operating performance and survival of US IPO firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35, 459-490.
31.
JainB. A.LiJ.ShaoY. (2013). Governance, product market competition, and cash management in IPO firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 2052-2068.
32.
JensenM. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
33.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1986). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
34.
KothariS. P.LaguerreT. E.LeoneA. J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies, 7, 355-382.
35.
KrishnanC. N. V.IvanovV. I.MasulisR. W.SinghA. K. (2011). Venture capital reputation, post-IPO performance, and corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46, 1295-1333.
36.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
37.
MillerD.Breton-MillerI. L.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829-858.
38.
MillerD.Breton-MillerI. L.LesterR. H. (2010). Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly traded companies. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 201-223.
39.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practices, 27, 367-382.
40.
MorellecE.NikolovB.SchürhoffN. (2012). Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics. Journal of Finance, 67, 803-848.
41.
Munoz-BullonF.Sanchez-BuenoM. J. (2011). Impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24, 62-70.
42.
OplerT.PinkowitzL.StulzR.WilliamsonR. (1999). The determinants and implications of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 3-46.
43.
PetersenM. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435-480.
44.
PolkC.SapienzaP. (2009). The stock market and corporate investment: A test of catering theory. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 187-217.
45.
ScharfsteinD. S.SteinJ. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 80, 465-479.
46.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.
47.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
