Adapting the theory of planned behavior to the area of financial choices in family firms, we argue that these choices in family firms are largely affected by family norms, attitude, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intentions. A time-lagged sample, estimated via structural equation modeling of 118 German family firms, supports a behavioral approach to the study of financing decisions. Specifically, we show that family norms and attitude toward external debt and external equity affect behavioral intention to use the respective financing choices, which in turn affects financing behavior. Perceived behavioral control, however, was shown to negatively affect behavioral intentions to use external equity and was positively related to the use of internal funds. Implications of these capital structure decisions and ideas for future research are discussed.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
AjzenI. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27-58.
3.
AjzenI. (2002a). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
4.
AjzenI. (2002b). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107-122.
AjzenI.CzaschC.FloodM. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1356-1372.
7.
AjzenI.MaddenT. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 222, 453-474.
8.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
9.
AmoreM. D.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2011). How do managerial sucessions shape corporate financial policies in fmaily firms?Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 1016-1027.
10.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
11.
AndersonR. C.MansiS. A.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263-285.
12.
AndresC. (2008). Large shareholders ad firm performance: An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 431-445.
13.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
14.
ArmstrongJ. S.OvertonT. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
15.
AstrachanJ.JaskiewiczP. (2008). Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately-held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. Family Business Review, 21(2), 139-150.
16.
BagnoliM.LiuH.-T.WattsS. G. (2011). Family firms, debtholder-shoreholder agency costs and teh use of covenants in private debt. Annals of Finance, 7, 477-509.
17.
BartonS. L.GordonP. J. (1987). Corporate strategy: Useful perspective for the study of capital structure?Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 67-75.
18.
BartonS. L.GordonP. J. (1988). Corproate stratetegy and capital structure. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 623-632.
19.
BeattieV. A.GoodacreA.ThomsonS. J. (2006). Corporate financing decisions: UK survey evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(9/10), 1402-1434.
20.
BeckT.Demirguc-KuntA. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.
21.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
22.
BjuggrenP.-O.SundL.-G. (2002). A transaction cost rationale for transition of the firm within the family. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 123-133.
23.
Blanco-MazagatosV.de Quevedo-PuenteE.CastrilloL. A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 20(3), 199-213.
24.
CampelloM. (2003). Capital structure and product markets interactions: Evidence from business cycles. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(3), 353-378.
25.
ChangE. P. C.MemiliE.ChrismanJ.KellermannsF. W.ChuaJ. (2009). Family social capital, venture preparedness, and start-up decisions: A study of Hispanic entrepreneurs in New England. Family Business Review, 22(3), 279-292.
26.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and non-family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 739-760.
27.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.WuZ. (2011). Agency problems of borrowed social and financial capital: Resolution in new ventures through family involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 472-488.
28.
ColemanS.CarskyM. (1999). Sources of capital for small family-owned businesses: Evidence from the national survey of small business finances. Family Business Review, 12(1), 73-84.
29.
CrociE.DoukasJ. A.GonencH. (2011). Family control and financing decisions. European Journal of Financial Management, 17(5), 860-897.
30.
DawsonA. (2011). Private equity investment decisions in family firms: The role of human resources and agency costs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 189-199.
31.
DelmarF.WiklundJ. (2008). The effects of small business managers’ growth motivation on firm growth: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 437-457.
32.
DeTienneD. R.CardonM. S. (2012). Impact of founder experience on extit intentions. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 351-374.
33.
DonckelsR.FröhlichE. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4(2), 149-160.
34.
EddlestonK.KellermannsF. W.SarathyR. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26-50.
35.
FanX.ThompsonB.WangL. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 56-83.
36.
FelthamT. S.FelthamF.BarnettJ. J. (2005). The dependence of family businesses on a single decision-maker. Journal of Small Business Management, 17, 258-270.
37.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
38.
GalloM. A.TapiesJ.CappuynsK. (2004). Comparison of family and nonfamily business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, 17(4), 303-318.
39.
GodinG.KokG. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-realted behavior. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87-98.
40.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesH. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
41.
HairJ. F.BlackB.BabinB.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
HamiltonR. T.FoxM. A. (1998). The financing preferences of small firm owners. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 4(3), 239-248.
43.
HaynesG.WalkerR.RoweB.HongG.-S. (1999). The intermingling of business and family finances in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 12(3), 225-239.
44.
HeckR. (2004). A commentary on “entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: a resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 383-389.
45.
HeymanD.DeloofM.OogheH. (2008). The financial structure of private held belgian firms. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 301-313.
46.
HoffmanJ.HoelscherM.SorensonR. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19, 135-145.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
49.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
HutchinsonR. W. (1995). The capital structure and investment decisions of the small owner-managed firm: Some exploratory issues. Small Business Economics, 7(3), 231-239.
51.
JaccardJ. (1981). Atttudes and behavior: Implications of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(3), 286-307.
52.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 809-830.
53.
KellyL. M.AthanassiouN.CrittendenW. F. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27-42.
54.
KerlingerF. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
55.
KingM. R.SantorE. (2008). Family values: Ownership structure, performance and capital structure of canadian firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(11), 2423-2432.
56.
KleinS. B. (2000). Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure. Family Business Review, 13, 157-181.
57.
KleinS. B.AstrachanJ. H.SmyrniosK. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321-339.
58.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59.
KoroppC.GrichnikD.KellermannsF. W. (2013). Financial attitudes in family firms: Opening the black box. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 114-137.
60.
KraftP.RiseJ.SuttonS.RøysambE. (2005). Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: Perceived behavioural control or affective attitude?British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 479-496.
61.
KruegerN. F.ReillyM. D.CarsrudA. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411-432.
62.
LinanF.ChenY.-W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
63.
López-GraciaJ.Sánchez-AndújarS. (2007). Financial structure of the family business: Evidence from a group of small spanish firms. Family Business Review, 20(4), 269-287.
64.
MaddenT. J.EllenP. S.AjzenI. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3-9.
65.
MahéraultL. (2000). The influence of going public on investment policy: An empirical study of french family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 13(1), 71-79.
66.
MahéraultL. (2004). Is there any specific equity route for small and medium-sized family businesses? The french experience. Family Business Review, 17(3), 221-235.
67.
MathiesonK. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
68.
MatthewsC. H.VasudevanD. P.BartonS. L.ApanaR. (1994). Capital structure decision making in privately held firms: Beyond the finance paradigm. Family Business Review, 7(4), 349-367.
69.
McConaughyD.MatthewsC. H.FialkoA. S. (2001). Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk, and value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(3), 31-49.
70.
McConaughyD.PhillipsG. (1999). Founders versus descendants: The profitability, efficiency, growth characteristics, and financing in large, public, founding-family-controlled firms. Family Business Review, 12(2), 123-132.
71.
MichaelsR. E.CronW. L.DubinskyA. J.JoachimsthalE. A. (1988). Influence of formalization on the orgnaizational commitmetn and work alienation of salespeople and industry buyers. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 376-380.
72.
ModiglianiF.MillerM. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.
73.
MollyV.LaverenE.DeloofM. (2010). Family business succession and its impact on financial structure and performance. Family Business Review, 23(2), 131-147.
74.
MollyV.LaverenE.JorissenA. (2012). Intergenerational differences in family firms: Impact on capital structure and growth behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 703-725.
75.
MorckR.YeungB. (2004). Family control and rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391-410.
76.
MustakallioM.AutioE.ZahraS. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15(3), 205-222.
77.
MyersS. C.MajlufN. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
78.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
79.
NevittJ.HancockG. R. (2000). Improving the root mean square error of approximation for nonnormal conditions in structural equation modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 251-268.
80.
NunallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
81.
ParsonsC.TitmanS. (2008). Empirical capital structure: A review. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 3(1), 1-93.
82.
PazzagliaF.MengoliS.SapienzaE. (2013). Earnings quality in acquired and nonacquired family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Family Business Review, 26(4), 374-386.
83.
PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949-969.
84.
PedhazurE. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanations and predictions (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
85.
PieperT. M.KleinS. B.JaskiewiczP. (2008). The impact of goal alignment on board existence and top management team composition: Evidence from family-influenced businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 372-394.
86.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
87.
PoutziourisP. Z. (2001). The views of family companies on venture capital: Empirical evidence from the uk small to medium-size enterprising economy. Family Business Review, 14(3), 277-291.
88.
RomanoC. A.TanewskiG. A.SmyrniosK. X. (2001). Capital structure decision making: A model for family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3), 285-310.
89.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179-194.
90.
Setia-AtmajaL.TanewskiG. A.SkullyM. (2009). The role of dividents, debt and board structure inteh governance of family controlled firms. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 36(7), 863-898.
91.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16(1), 1-15.
92.
SharmaP.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2005). Succession Planning. In HittM. A.IrelandR. D. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of entrepreneurship. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
93.
SharmaP.ManikuttyS. (2005). Strategic divestment in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(3), 293-312.
94.
SheppardB. H.HartwickJ.WarshawP. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modification and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.
95.
SimonH. (2009). Hidden champions of the 21st century: Success strategies of unknown world market leaders. London, UK: Springer.
96.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339-358.
97.
StavrouE. P. (1998). A four factor model: A guide to planning next generation involvement in the family firm. Family Business Review, 11(2), 135-142.
98.
SteijversT.VoordeckersW. (2009). Private family ownership and the agency costs of debt. Family Business Review, 22(4), 333-346.
99.
SundaramurthyC.KreinerG. E. (2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 415-436.
100.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199-208.
101.
TuckerL.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.
102.
WuZ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2007). Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 875-895.
103.
YilmazerT.SchrankH. (2006). Financial intermingling in small family businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 726-751.
104.
ZellwegerT.SiegerP.HalterF. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521-536.
105.
ZellwegerT. M.EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54-63.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
