The authors conduct a simulation study using system dynamics methods to interpret how and when paternalism affects dynamic capabilities (DCs) and by association value creation in family firms. Their simulation experiments suggest that the effect of paternalism on DCs and value creation varies over time. Initially, increasing levels of family social capital and low levels of paternalism are associated with high rates of DCs and value creation accumulation (asset). Later, higher levels of paternalism produce their pressure to decrease DCs, value creation, and family social capital accumulation rates (liability).
AbelsonH.SussmanG. J.SussmanJ. (1996). Structure and interpretation of computer programs. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
AhujaG.LampertC. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 221-238.
3.
AronoffC. E.WardJ. L. (1997). Preparing your family business for strategic change (Family Business Leadership Series No. 9). Marietta, GA: Business Owner Resources.
4.
ArregleL.HittM.SirmonD.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-95.
5.
BarlasY. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review, 12, 183-210.
6.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120
7.
BothnerM.WhiteH. (2001). Market orientation and monopoly power. In LomiA.LarsenE. R. (Eds.), Dynamics of organizations: Computational modeling and organization theories (pp. 182-209). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
8.
BrudererE.SinghJ. S. (1996). Organizational evolution, learning, and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based model. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1322-1349.
9.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrade-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
10.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
11.
CarleyK. M. (2001). Computational approaches to sociological theorizing. In TurnerJ. (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 69-84). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
12.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.
13.
ChiricoF. (2008). Knowledge accumulation in family firms: Evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal, 26, 433-462.
14.
ChiricoF.IrelandD.SirmonD. (2011). Franchising and the family firm: Creating unique sources of advantage through “Familiness.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 483-501.
15.
ChiricoF.NordqvistM. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and transgenerational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 20, 1-18.
16.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC. (2008). Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21, 169-181.
17.
ChiricoF.SirmonD.SciasciaS.MazzolaP. (2011). Resource orchestration in family firms: Investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 307-326.
18.
CohenM. D.MarchJ.OlsenJ. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
19.
ColliA. (2003). The history of family business 1850–2000. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
DavisJ. P.BinghamC. B.EisenhardtK. M. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32, 580-599.
21.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 7, 311-323.
22.
DessG. D.LumpkinG. T.McGeeJ. E. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure and process: suggested research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 85-102.
23.
DyerW. G. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing businesses and family traditions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
DyerW. G. (1988). Culture and continuity in family firms. Family Business Review, 1, 37-50.
25.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.SarathyR. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 26-50.
26.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.ZellwegerT. M. (2010). Exploring the entrepreneurial behavior of family firms: Does the stewardship perspective explain differences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x
27.
EisenhardtK. M.MartinJ. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
28.
FarhJ. L.ChengB. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In LiJ. T.TsuiA. S.WeldonE. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84-127). London, England: Macmillan.
29.
FarhJ. L.ChengB. S.ChouL. F.ChuX. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In TsuiA. S.BianY.ChengL. (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230-260). New York, NY: Sharpe.
30.
FichmanM.LevinthalD. A. (1991). Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 16, 442-468.
31.
FineG. A.ElsbachK. D. (2000). Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 51-76.
32.
FioresiR.MollonaE. (2010). Devices for theory development: Why use computer simulation if mathematical analysis is available? In MollonaE. (Ed.), Computational analysis of firms’ strategy and organizations (pp. 69-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
ForresterJ. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
ForresterJ. W.SengeP. M. (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. TIMS Studies in the Management Science, 14, 209-228.
35.
GaryS.LarsenE. R. (2000). Improving firm performance in out-of-equilibrium, deregulated markets using feedback simulation models. Energy Policy, 28, 845-855.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.McCollomM.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
38.
GiddingsT. (2003, March17). Avoid these family business obstacles [Advertising supplement]. Los Angeles Business Journal, 40.
39.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
40.
GranataD.ChiricoF. (2010). Measures of value in acquisitions: Family versus non-family firms. Family Business Review, 23, 341-354.
41.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 7, 1-25.
42.
HallA.MelinL.NordqvistM. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14, 193-208.
43.
HambrickD. C.FukutomiG. (1991). The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16, 719-742.
44.
HannemanR.CollinsR.MordtG. (1995). Discovering theory dynamics by computer simulation: Experiments on state legitimacy and imperialist capitalism. In MarsdenP. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 1-46). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
45.
HarrisonJ. R.LinZ.CarrollG. R.CarleyK. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organisational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1229-1245.
46.
HendersonA. D.MillerD.HambrickD. C. (2006). How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 447-460.
KogutB.ZanderU. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
49.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
JayaramanN.KhoranaA.NellingE.CovinJ. (2000). CEO founder status and firm financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1215-1224.
51.
JohannissonB.HuseM. (2000) Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 353-378.
52.
LantT. K. (1992). Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Science, 38, 623-644.
53.
LarsenE.LomiA. (1999). Resetting the clock: A feedback approach to the dynamics of organizational inertia, survival and change. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50, 406-421.
54.
LarsenE.LomiA. (2002). Representing change: A systems model of organizational inertia and capabilities as dynamic accumulation processes. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 10, 271-296.
55.
LawA. M.KeltonW. D. (1991). Simulation modeling and analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
56.
LimE. N. K.LubatkinM. H.WisemanR. M. (2010). A family firm variant of the behavioral agency theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 197-211.
57.
LomiA.LarsenE. (1996). Interacting locally and evolving globally: A computational approach to the dynamics of organizational populations. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1287-1321.
58.
LomiA.LarsenE. (Eds.). (2001). Dynamics of organizations: Computational modeling and organization theories. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
59.
LomiA.LarsenE.FreemanJ. (2005). Things change: Dynamic resource constraints and system-dependent selection in the evolution of organizational populations. Management Science, 51, 882-903.
60.
LomiA.LarsenE.WezelF. (2010). Getting there: Exploring the role of expectations and pre-production delay in processes of organizational founding. Organization Science, 21, 132-149.
61.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
62.
MillerD. (1991). Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37, 34-52.
63.
MillerD.ShamsieJ. (2001). Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 725-745.
64.
MollonaE. (2010). The use of computer simulation in strategy and organization research. In MollonaE. (Ed.), Computational analysis of firms’ strategy and organizations (pp. 3-35). New York, NY: Routledge
65.
MollonaE.HalesD. (2006). Knowledge-based jobs and the boundaries of firms: Agent-based simulation of firms learning and workforce skill set dynamics. Computational Economics, 27(1), 35-62.
66.
MollonaE.MarcozziA. (2009a). FirmNet: The scope of firms and the allocation of task in a knowledge-based economy. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 15, 109-126.
67.
MollonaE.MarcozziA. (2009b). Self-emerging coordination mechanisms for knowledge integration processes. Mind & Society, 8, 223-241.
68.
MorecroftJ.StermanJ. (1994). Modeling for learning organizations. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
69.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
70.
PearceJ. L. (2005, August). Paternalism and radical organizational change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
71.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A. (2006). Leader-member exchange (LMX), paternalism and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264-279.
72.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34, 566-593.
73.
ReddingS. G.NormanA.SchlanderA. (1994). The nature of individual attachment to theory: A review of East Asian variations. In DunnettM. D.HoughL. M.TriandisH. C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 674-688). Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
74.
RivkinJ. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46, 824-844.
75.
RommeA. G. L.ZolloM.BerendsP. (2010). Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: a simulation model. Industrial and Corporate Change19(4), 1271-1299.
76.
RubensonG. C.GuptaA. K. (1992). Replacing the founder: Exploding the myth of the entrepreneur’s disease. Business Horizons, 35(6), 53-59.
77.
RudolphJ.RepenningN. (2002). Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 1-30.
78.
SalvatoC. (2004). Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. Journal of Private Equity, 7, 68-76.
79.
SalvatoC.ChiricoF.SharmaP. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 1-28.
80.
SalvatoC.MelinL. (2008). Creating value across generations in family controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review, 23, 259-276.
81.
SastryM. A. (1997). Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 237-275.
82.
ScheinE. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 13-28.
83.
SchneiderS. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1040-1057.
84.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
SharmaP.ManikuttyS. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 293-312.
86.
SirmonD. G.ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.WebbJ. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic response to competitive threat. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 979-998.
87.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
88.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A.IrelandR. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273-292.
89.
StermanJ. D. (1987). Expectation formation in behavioral simulation models. Behavioral Science, 32, 190-211.
90.
StermanJ. D. (2000). Business dynamics, systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
91.
StewartA. (2003). Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 383-396.
92.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
Uhl-BienM.MaslynM. (2005, August). Paternalism as a form of leadership: Differentiating paternalism from leader member exchange. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
95.
VandenBosG. R. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
96.
Van MaanenJ. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133-143.
97.
WeickK. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516-531.
98.
WestwoodR.ChanA. (1992). Headship and leadership. In WestwoodR. (Ed.), Organisational behaviour: Southeast Asian perspectives (pp. 118-143). Hong Kong, SAR: Longman.
99.
ZahraS. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23-40.
100.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ.SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 363-382.
101.
ZolloM.WinterS. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339-351.
102.
ZottC. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 97-125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
