Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

With generative artificial intelligence’s (GenAI) growing popularity, individuals are increasingly using it when searching for election-related information. This scenario raises concerns that GenAI usage may result in widespread dissemination of misinformation, given its ability to generate seemingly authentic information. Nevertheless, despite the importance of Gen AI, few researchers have examined how individuals use this tool to search for election-related information. This study aims to assess how GenAI’s perceived system (i.e., accessibility and integration) and information quality (i.e., completeness, accuracy, and neutrality) impact its usage. Focusing on the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we conducted a two-wave survey and data was collected from 364 Americans. Participants were found to have a favorable attitude overall toward GenAI. Further, accuracy and neutrality were positively associated with GenAI usage. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis was also conducted to identify different configurations of perceived system and information quality that led to high GenAI usage. Analyzing the qualitative responses further confirmed the results. This study contributes to the literature on the role of GenAI during elections, providing a nuanced understanding of how dimensions of GenAI’s perceived system and information quality impact individuals’ GenAI usage. The findings have significant practical implications for dealing with the (mis)information generated by GenAI.

Keywords

generative AI election perceived information quality perceived system quality fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

Fishbein

(1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Apuke

O. D.

Omar

(2021). Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics, 56, Article 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475

Apuke

O. D.

Omar

Tunca

E. A.

Gever

C. V.

(2024). Information overload and misinformation sharing behaviour of social media users: Testing the moderating role of cognitive ability. Journal of Information Science, 50(6), 1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221121942

Balakrishnan

K. S.

Rahim

H. A.

(2021). To share or not to share: The underlying motives of sharing fake news amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 66(1), Article 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101676

Brynjolfsson

Lindsey

Raymond

(2023). Generative AI at work. Working paper 31161. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w31161

Burke

(2024). Chatbots’ inaccurate, misleading responses about US elections threaten to keep voters from polls. https://apnews.com/article/ai-chatbots-elections-artificial-intelligence-chatgpt-falsehoods-cc50dd0f3f4e7cc322c7235220fc4c69

Carpini

M. X. D.

Keeter

(1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.

Carter

(2023). Where Americans get their news: New data from pew research. https://www.prdaily.com/where-americans-get-their-news-new-data-from-pew-research/

Cheung

A. K. F.

(2014). The use of reported speech and the perceived neutrality of court interpreters. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 16(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.16.2.03che

10.

Craig

S. C.

Gainous

(2024). To vote or not to vote? Fake news, voter fraud, and support for postponing the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Politics & Policy, 52(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12577

11.

DeLone

W. H.

McLean

E. R.

(2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

12.

Ecker

Roozenbee

van der Linden

Tay

L. Q.

Cook

Oreskes

Lewandowsky

(2024). Misinformation poses a bigger threat to democracy than you might think. Nature, 630(8015), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01587-3

13.

Edgerly

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

Thorson

(2018). New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertoires and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706928

14.

Elejalde

Ferres

Herder

(2018). On the nature of real and perceived bias in the mainstream media. PLoS One, 13(3), Article e0193765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193765

15.

Floridi

Cowls

Beltrametti

Chatila

Chazerand

Dignum

Luetge

Madelin

Pagallo

Rossi

Schafer

Valcke

Rossi

(2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

16.

Forsgren

Durcikova

Clay

P. F.

Wang

(2016). The integrated user satisfaction model: Assessing information quality and system quality as second-order constructs in system administration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38, 803–839. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03839

17.

Garimella

Chauchard

(2024). How prevalent is AI misinformation? What our studies in India show so far. Nature, 630(8015), 32–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01588-2

18.

Gorla

Somers

T. M.

Wong

(2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001

19.

Prentice

Wang

(2024). Symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches to brand loyalty: The case of intelligent voice assistants. Journal of Business Research, 183(1), Article 114850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114850

20.

Iida

Song

Estrada

J. L.

Takahashi

(2024). Fake news and its electoral consequences: A survey experiment on Mexico. AI & Society, 39(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01541-9

21.

Islam

A. K. M. N.

Laato

Talukder

Sutinen

(2020). Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159(2), Article 120201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120201

22.

Jain

Basu

Ray

Das

(2023). Impact of irritation and negative emotions on the performance of voice assistants: Netting dissatisfied customers’ perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 72(1), Article 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102662

23.

Kavanaugh

Sheetz

S. D.

Skandrani

Fox

E. A.

(2017). Media use by young tunisians during the 2011 revolution vs 2014 elections. Information Polity, 22(2-3), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170412

24.

Khan

M. L.

Idris

I. K.

(2019). Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: A reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1194–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1578828

25.

Lammertyn

(2024). 60+ ChatGPT facts and statistics you need to know in 2024. https://blog.invgate.com/chatgpt-statistics

26.

Lee

Jones-Jang

S. M.

(2024). Cynical Nonpartisans: The Role of Misinformation in Political Cynicism During the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. New Media & Society, 26(7), 4255–4276.

27.

Lewandowsky

Ecker

U. K.

Seifert

C. M.

Schwarz

Cook

(2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018

28.

Liu

Mezei

Kostakos

(2015). Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: A methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities. Information Systems Journal, 27(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12094

29.

Lupia

Philpot

T. S.

(2005). Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults’ political interest. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1122–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00353.x

30.

Nguyen

Dang

Duc

D. T. V.

(2025). The dark sides of AI advertising: The integration of cognitive appraisal theory and information quality theory. Social Science Computer Review, 43(2), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241258760

31.

O’Brien

(2024). Meta says it will label AI-generated images on Facebook and Instagram. https://apnews.com/article/meta-adds-labels-to-ai-imagery-deepfakes-415163d053ed915042a04f1ec3d9eafa

32.

Park

Lee

J. Y.

(2023). Incidental news exposure on Facebook and its relation to trust in news. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231158823

33.

Pew Research Center . (2014). Political polarization in the American public. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2014/06/12/about-the-surveys-25/

34.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J.-Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

35.

Ragin

C. C.

(2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and overage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019

36.

Ragin

C. C.

(2008a). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.

37.

Ragin

C. C.

(2008b). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. https://www.u.arizona.edu/cragin/fsQCA/download/fsQCAManual.pdf

38.

Sainato

(2024). AI-generated images of trump with black voters being spread by supporters. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/04/trump-ai-generated-images-black-voters

39.

Schneider

C. Q.

Wagemann

(2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.

40.

Schuetz

S. W.

Sykes

T. A.

Venkatesh

(2021). Combating COVID-19 fake news on social media through fact checking: Antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1895682

41.

Shin

(2025). Debiasing AI: Rethinking the intersection of innovation and sustainability. Routledge.

42.

Shin

Koerber

Lim

J. S.

(2024). Impact of misinformation from generative AI on user information processing: How people understand misinformation from generative AI. New Media & Society, 27(7), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241234040

43.

Shirish

Srivastava

S. C.

Chandra

(2021). Impact of Mobile connectivity and freedom on fake news propensity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country empirical examination. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1886614

44.

Sun

(2022). Verification upon exposure to COVID-19 misinformation: Predictors, outcomes, and the mediating role of verification. Science Communication, 44(3), 261–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221088927

45.

Taylor

(2025). Albania appoints world’s first AI-made minister. https://www.politico.eu/article/albania-apppoints-worlds-first-virtual-minister-edi-rama-diella/

46.

Tseng

Huang

Cheng

T. C. E.

Teng

(2023). Evaluating e-commerce website qualities: Personality traits as triggers. Internet Research, 33(2), 741–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2021-0001

47.

Valenzuela

Muñiz

Santos

(2024). Social media and belief in misinformation in Mexico: A case of maximal panic, minimal effects? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(3), 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221088988

48.

Van Dis

Bollen

Zuidema

van Rooij

Bockting

C. L.

(2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7

49.

Verbit . (2024). ChatGPT accessibility: Everything you need to know. https://verbit.ai/general/chatgpt-accessibility-everything-you-need-to-know/

50.

Wang

Pang

Pavlou

P. A.

(2021a). Cure or poison? Identity verification and the posting of fake news on social media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(4), 1011–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1990615

51.

Wang

Lin

Shao

(2024). Security and privacy protection in developing ethical AI: A mixed-methods study from a marketing employee perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 200(2), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05894-7

52.

Wang

Lin

Abdullat

(2021). The dual concept of consumer value in social media brand community: A trust transfer perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 59(1), Article 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102319

53.

Wixom

B. H.

Todd

P. A.

(2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042

54.

Wang

Yan

(2021). The moderating effect of abusive supervision on information security policy compliance: Evidence from the hospitality industry. Computers & Security, 111, Article 102455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102455

Generative AI Usage by Individuals During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References