Unveiling the Making of Trending Topics on a Digital Platform: A Research Note on Chinese Sina Weibo

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics and duration of trending topics on digital platforms has been deemed a crucial issue of research in computer-mediated communication. Employing event history analysis (EHA), this study attempts to examine the antecedents of the lifespan and evolution of trending topics on Sina Weibo, one of the most prevalent social media platforms in China. Based on a collection of 2,386 Sina Weibo trending topics that emerged between January 1 and January 31, 2022, the study explores how factors of trending topics, especially their semantic and textual features, significantly influence topic persistence. Our findings indicate that the median survival time of Weibo trending topic was 6.28 hours, with an average of 8.29 hours. In addition, exogenous non-viral topics, driven by external events or media coverage, tend to remain on the trending list longer than other topics. Furthermore, political topics tend to have a relatively longer period of survival duration when compared to social events, life records and moods, and fashion and entertainment topics. Lastly, actionable and opinion-oriented topics tend to have shorter longevity compared to informational and emotional topics. By quantifying the factors that affect trending topic duration, the study offers a novel theoretical perspective on the role of political drivers and external influences in shaping collective and connective digital discourses. The findings contribute to the broader field of digital platform communication, particularly in public opinion management and content governance on social media.

Keywords

event history analysis trending topics duration social media Sina Weibo

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adolph

Amano

Bang-Jensen

Fullman

Wilkerson

(2021). Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 46(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8802162

Allison

P. D.

(2010). Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide, second edition. SAS publishing.

Asur

Huberman

B. A.

Szabo

Wang

(2011). Trends in social media: Persistence and decay. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 434–437. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14167

Berger

Milkman

K. L.

(2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353

Crane

Sornette

(2008). Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(41), 15649–15653. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803685105

Cui

Kertész

(2023). “Born in Rome” or “Sleeping Beauty”: Emergence of hashtag popularity on the Chinese microblog sina weibo. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 619(128724), 128724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128724

Danielsson

Shin

H. S.

(2003). Modern risk management: A history, Risk Books. Endogenous risk.

Doornich

J. B.

Pedersen

P. A.

(2024). Exogenous shocks and the dynamics between geopolitics and global trade. Journal of World Trade, 58(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4534369

Earl

Maher

T. V.

Pan

(2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review. Science Advances, 8(10), eabl8198. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198

10.

Fan

Yeung

K. H.

(2015). Similarity between community structures of different online social networks and its impact on underlying community detection. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 20(3), 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.07.002

11.

Fink

(1986). Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable. American Management Association.

12.

High

Nemes

(2007). Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x

13.

Hong

Xie

Lan

Liu

Yan

Zhang

(2023). Evolution of public attitudes and opinions regarding COVID-19 Vaccination during the Vaccine campaign in China: Year-long Infodemiology study of weibo posts. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(2), Article e42671. https://doi.org/10.2196/42671

14.

Huang

Long

Chen

Sun

(2023). Examining public attitudes and perceptions of waste sorting in China through an urban heterogeneity lens: A social media analysis. Conservation & Recycling, 199(107233), 107233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107233

15.

Kim

Sung

K. H.

Xing

J. G.

(2021). Online firestorms in social media: Comparative research between China Weibo and USA Twitter. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102010

16.

King

Pan

Roberts

(2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014

17.

King

Pan

Roberts

M. E.

(2017). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144

18.

Koning

E. A.

(2016). The three institutionalisms and institutional dynamics: Understanding endogenous and exogenous change. Journal of Public Policy, 36(4), 639–664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X15000240

19.

Chen

(2022). An analysis on the Weibo topic detection based on k-means algorithm. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Big Data and Algorithms (EEBDA), 7(1), 1328–1331. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEBDA53927.2022.9744787

20.

Boersma

(2017). The role of social media in providing crisis information in China: A critical evaluation of the Tianjin fire incident. Journal of Systems Science & Information, 5(6), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.21078/jssi-2017-556-15

21.

Licht

A. A.

(2011). Change comes with time: Substantive interpretation of nonproportional hazards in event history analysis. Political Analysis, 19(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq039

22.

Lorentzen

(2014). China's strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12065

23.

Miao

Chen

Zhou

Zha

Yang

Zhang

(2015). Online trendy topics detection in microblogs with selective user monitoring under cost constraints. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 4(8), 1194–1200. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2015.7248485

24.

Miller

(2016). Automatic detection of Chinese government astroturfers using network and social metadata. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2738325

25.

K. W.

Horawalavithana

Iamnitchi

(2022). Social media activity forecasting with exogenous and endogenous signals. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00927-3

26.

Obukhova

Zuckerman

E. W.

Zhang

(2014). When politics froze fashion: The effect of the cultural revolution on naming in Beijing. American Journal of Sociology, 120(2), 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1086/678318

27.

Pan

Chen

(2018). Concealing corruption: How Chinese officials distort upward reporting of online grievances. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000205

28.

Yao

Fan

(2023). Competitive rivalry in the digital market: An action-configuration perspective. Management Decision, 61(1), 144–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2021-1158

29.

Rao

A. D.

Nicholas

S. E.

Kachniarz

Redmond

K. J.

Deville

Wright

J. L.

Page

B. R.

Terezakis

Viswanathan

A. N.

DeWeese

T. L.

Fivush

B. A.

Alcorn

S. R.

(2018). Association of a simulated institutional gender equity initiative with gender-based disparities in medical school faculty salaries and promotions. JAMA Network Open, 1(8), e186054. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6054

30.

Snyder

L. B.

(1991). Modeling dynamic communication processes with event history analysis. Communication Research, 18(4), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018004002

31.

Trentini

(2024). Labour market trajectories and unemployment of older workers in Europe after the Great Recession. Sociology Compass, 18(5), Article e13215. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13215

32.

Urrieta

Jr. Méndez

Rodríguez

(2015). “A moving target”: A critical race analysis of Latina/o faculty experiences, perspectives, and reflections on the tenure and promotion process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(10), 1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.974715

33.

Wang

Qiu

(2020). Topic analysis of internet public opinion on natural Disasters based on time Division. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Advanced Electronic Materials, Computers and Software Engineering (AEMCSE), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/aemcse50948.2020.00009

34.

Wang

Zhang

Z. L.

Jia

Zhou

S. S.

(2015). Finding the hidden hands: A case study of detecting organized posters and promoters in SINA weibo. China Communications, 12(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2015.7366237

35.

Wang

Chen

Shen

(2024). Exploring online perceptions of justice in large-scale infrastructure projects: Temporal patterns, sentiment characteristics, and topic changes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40(1), 05023008. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5556

36.

Weibo (2024a). Explanation of the rules of the hot search list. Sina Corporation. https://m.s.weibo.com/hot/description

37.

Weibo

(2024b). Annual Report 2023. Sina Corporation. https://ir.weibo.com/static-files/52b1a735-5e44-48fb-b2db-47c94e1f015b.

38.

Yang

Peng

(2020). The importance of trending topics in the gatekeeping of social media news engagement: A natural experiment on weibo. Communication Research, 49(7), 994–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220933729

39.

L. L.

Asur

Huberman

B. A.

(2012). Artificial inflation: The real story of trends and trend-setters in Sina Weibo. In 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, 4(7), 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.45

40.

Zhao

Gao

Liu

(2017). Which factors affect the duration of hot topics on social media platforms? Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 2395–2407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0395-1

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.27 MB