Phubbing (phone snubbing) has become the norm in (im)polite society. A vast majority of US adults report using their phones during a recent social interaction. Using one’s phone in the presence of others has been shown to have a negative impact on relationships among co-workers, friends, family, and romantic partners. Recent research suggests viewing short-form videos (SFVs) (e.g., TikTok) is more addictive/immersive than traditional social media (e.g., Facebook) leading to a greater likelihood of phubbing others. Across two studies, the present research investigates the relationship between SFV viewing and phubbing and the possible mediating effect of self-control. We also test whether TikTok has a stronger relationship with phubbing than Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, two popular SFV purveyors. Study 1 (282 college students) finds that viewing TikTok videos is positively associated with phubbing others and this relationship is mediated by self-control. Interestingly, Study 1 also finds that this relationship does not hold for Instagram Reels and YouTube shorts. Using two different measures of self-control, Study 2 (198 adults) provides additional support for the mediating effect of self-control on the SFV viewing—phubbing relationship. Again, the model is only supported for TikTok SFV viewing, not Instagram or YouTube. In sum, the viewing of carefully curated short TikTok videos, often 30–60 seconds in length, undermines self-control which is associated with increased phubbing behavior. Implications of the present study’s findings expand far beyond phubbing. Self-control plays a central role in nearly all human decision making and behavior. Suggestions for future research are offered.
AuxierB.AndersonM. (2021). Social media use in 2012. Pew Research Center, 1(1), 1-4.
2.
BoaseJ.LingR. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12021
3.
ChiossiF.HaliburtonL.OuC.ButzA. M.SchmidtA. (2023). Short-form videos degrade our capacity to retain intentions: Effect of context switching on prospective memory. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–15). April23, Hamburg, Germanyhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580778
4.
ChotpitayasunondhV.DouglasK. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behaviour, 63(October), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
5.
CourtrightJ. A.CaplanS. E. (2020). Two meta-analyses of mobile phone use and presence. Human Communications & Technology, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17161/hct.v1i2.13412
6.
CoxR. C.ColeD. A.KramerE. L.OlatunjiB. O. (2018). Prospective associations between sleep disturbance and repetitive negative thinking: The mediating roles of focusing and shifting attentional control. Behaviour Therapy, 49(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.007
7.
DavidM. E.RobertsJ. A. (2020). Developing and testing a scale designed to measure perceived phubbing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218152
DerryberryD.ReedM. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.111.2.225
10.
EllisD. A.DavidsonB. I.ShawH.GeyerK. (2019). Do smartphone usage scales predict behaviour?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130(October), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.004
11.
FranchinaV.Vanden AbeeleM.van RoojA. J.Lo CoocoG.De MarezL. (2018). Fear of missing out as a predictor of problematic social media use and phubbing behaviour among Flemish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102319
12.
HasanM. R.JhaA. K.LiuY. (2018). Excessive use of online video streaming services: Impact of recommender system use, psychological factors, and motives. Computers in Human Behaviour, 80(March), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.020
13.
HayesA. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 1(6), 20.
14.
HayesA. F.RockwoodN. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98(November), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
15.
HeathertonT. F.WagnerD. D. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005
16.
HoffmanW.FrieseM.StrackF. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116
17.
IlhanC. (2020). Understanding factors affecting phubbing with structural equation modeling [master’s thesis]. Istanbul Teknik University.
18.
IqbalM. (2021). TikTok revenue and usage statistics (2021). Business of Apps, 1(1).
19.
JargonJ. (2023). An antidote for ‘TikTok brain’ has also become a problem: YouTube shorts adds ‘short bursts of thrills’ to kids’ digital diets, making it harder to pull away. Wall Street Journal, A9.
20.
JiangZ.ZhaoX. (2016). Self-control and problematic mobile phone use in Chinese college students: The mediating role of mobile phone use patterns. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 416. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1131-z
21.
KhangH.KimJ. K.KimY. (2013). Self-traits and motivations as antecedents of digital media flow and addiction: The internet, mobile phones, and video games. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(6), 2416–2424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.027
22.
KhangH.WooH. J.KimJ. K. (2012). Self as an antecedent of mobile phone addiction. Journal of Mobile Communication, 10(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmc.2012.044523
LiuM.ZhuangA.NorvilitisJ. M.XiaoT. (2024). Usage patterns of short videos and social media among adolescents and psychological health: A latent profile analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 151(February), 108007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108007
25.
MarangesH. M.BaumeisterR. (2016). Self-control and ego depletion. In Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
26.
McDanielB. T.GalovanA. M.DrouinM. (2021). Daily technoference, technology use during couple leisure time, and relationship quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1783561
27.
MontagC.YangH.ElhaiJ. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(March), 641673–641676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673
28.
ÓlafssonR. P.SmáriJ.GuðmundsdóttirF.ÓlafsdóttirG.HarðardóttirH. L.EinarssonS. M. (2011). Self-reported attentional control with the attentional control scale: Factor structure and relationship with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(6), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.013
29.
ParryD. A.DavidsonB. I.SewallC. J. R.FisherJ. T.MieczkowskiH.QuintanaD. S. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1535–1547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5
30.
PermataB.RahajuS.YunantoT. A. R. (2023). Phubbing in Millennial generation: The influence of fear of missing out and self-control. Journal of Educational Health, and Community, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v1i1.25001
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behaviour Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
RobertsJ. A.DavidM. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behaviour, 54(January), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
34.
RobertsJ. A.DavidM. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117
SansevereK. S.WardN. (2021). Linking phubbing behaviour to self-reported attentional failures and media multitasking. Future Internet, 13(4), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13040100
37.
SuC.TengB.ZhouH.GengF.HuY. (2023). Prefrontal suppression in short-video viewing: Unraveling the neural correlates of self-control. medRxiv, 2023–2110. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.30.23296738
38.
SuC.ZhouH.GongL.TengB.GengF.YuzhengH. (2021). Viewing personalized video clips recommended by TikTok activates default mode network and ventral tegmental area. NeuroImage, 237(August), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/neuroimage.2021.118136
39.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.
40.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and research agenda. In LingR.GogginG.FortunatiL.LimS. S.LiY. (Eds.), Handbook of mobile communication, culture, and information (pp. 158–174). Oxford Press.
41.
YanY.HeY.LiL. (2023). Why time flies? The role of immersion in short video usage behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(April), 1127210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127210
42.
YangJ.TiY.YeY. (2022). Offline and online social support and short-form video addiction among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of emotion suppression and relatedness needs. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 25(5), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0323
43.
YangY.LiuR. D.DingY.LinJ.DingZ.YangX. (2024). Time distortion for short-form video users. Computers in Human Behaviour, 151(February), 108009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108009
44.
YaqiZ.LeeJ. Y.LiuS. (2021). Research on the uses and gratifications of TikTok (Douyin short video). International Journal of Contents, 17(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2021.17.1.037
45.
ZhangN.HazarikaB.ChenK.ShiY. (2023). A cross-national study on the excessive use of short-video applications among college students. Computers in Human Behaviour, 145, 107752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107752
46.
ZhangX.WuY.LiuS. (2019). Exploring short-form video application addiction: Socio- technical and attachment perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 42(9), 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101243
47.
ZhaoH.WagnerC. (2023). How TikTok leads to user flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators. Internet Research, 33(2), 820–829. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2021-0595
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
