Does the Media’s Partisanship Influence News Coverage on Artificial Intelligence Issues? Media Coverage Analysis on Artificial Intelligence Issues

Abstract

This study aims to analyze news coverage on artificial intelligence (AI) issues and highlight the characteristics and differences in reporting based on media partisanship. By examining AI-related news in the South Korean media, this study reveals how conservative and progressive outlets frame the issue differently. The analysis found that conservative media coverage predominantly focuses on positive aspects, emphasizing development value frames such as the benefits and societal progress brought by AI. In contrast, progressive media often highlight crisis value frames, focusing on issues like side effects, ethical concerns, and legislation surrounding AI. These partisan differences reflect fundamental societal priorities and influence public discourse and policy agendas. Understanding media framing is crucial for fostering informed public dialogue on the societal significance of AI and promoting evidence-based decision-making. By recognizing partisan biases and critically evaluating media coverage, citizens can engage in constructive discourse beyond ideological divides. This study underscores the role of the media in promoting interdisciplinary discussions about the future trajectory of AI and in preparing society for its impacts. Ultimately, evidence-based public discourse is essential for shaping responsible AI policies and mitigating potential risks in the digital age.

Keywords

artificial intelligence media coverage partisanship frame science communication public discourse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloomberg . (2024). South Korea’s semiconductor output rises by most in 14 years. Retrieved 29/3/24 from. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-29/south-korea-s-semiconductor-output-rises-by-most-in-14-years

Bolsen

Druckman

J. N.

(2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12171

Bostrom

(2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

Boykoff

M. T.

Boykoff

J. M.

(2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008

Brewer

P. R.

(2002). Framing, value words, and citizens’ explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01957470290055510

Brewer

P. R.

(2003). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights: A framing-based account. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(2), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1086/374397

CES . (2024). CES 2024 keynotes. Consumer Technology Association. Retrieved 9/1/24 from. https://www.ces.tech/sessions-events/keynotes.aspx

Chong

Druckman

J. N.

(2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x

Chuan

C.-H.

Tsai

W.-H. S.

Cho

S. Y.

(2019). Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. Honolulu, HI, USA, ACM.

10.

CNN . (2024). Samsung reports enormous jump in profit on AI boom. Retrieved 29/4/24 from. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/29/tech/south-korea-samsung-profits-ai-boom-hnk-intl/index.html

11.

Crimston

C. R.

Selvanathan

H. P.

(2000). Polarization. In Jetten

Reicher

S. D.

Haslam

S. A.

Cruwys

(Eds.), Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19 (pp. 107–112). Sage.

12.

Entman

R. M.

(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

13.

Fast

Horvitz

(2017). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10635

14.

Floridi

Cowls

Beltrametti

Chatila

Chazerand

Dignum

Luetge

Madelin

Pagallo

Rossi

Schafer

Valcke

Vayena

(2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

15.

Fryberg

S. A.

Stephens

N. M.

Covarrubias

Markus

H. R.

Carter

E. D.

Laiduc

G. A.

Salido

A. J.

(2012). How the media frames the immigration debate: The critical role of location and politics. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01259.x

16.

Gamson

W. A.

Modigliani

(1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213

17.

Goffman

(1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

18.

Green

Edgerton

Naftel

Shoub

Cranmer

S. J.

(2020). Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(28), Article eabc2717. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc2717

19.

Hart

P. S.

Chinn

Soroka

(2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020950735

20.

Iyengar

(1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.

21.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Sulloway

F. J.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(2018). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. The motivated mind, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339

22.

King

Schneer

White

(2017). How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science, 358(6364), 776–780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1100

23.

McCombs

M. E.

Shaw

D. L.

(1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

24.

Nisbet

M. C.

(2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/envt.51.2.12-23

25.

OECD . (2024). OECD digital economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1). Retrieved 14/5/24 from. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-economy-outlook-2024-volume-1_a1689dc5-en.html

26.

Rekker

(2021). The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989193

27.

Reuters . (2024). South Korea to invest $7 billion in AI in bid to retain edge in chips. Retrieved 9/4/24 from. https://www.reuters.com/technology/south-korea-invest-7-bln-ai-bid-retain-edge-chips-2024-04-09/

28.

Russell

(2022). Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. In Perspectives on Digital Humanism, (Vol. 19.). Springer.

29.

Scheufele

D. A.

(1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/49.1.103

30.

Scheufele

D. A.

Tewksbury

(2007). Framing, Agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

31.

Slothuus

(2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual‐process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x

32.

Tortoise Media . (2023). The global AI Index. Retrieved 28/6/23 from. https://www.tortoisemedia.com/intelligence/global-ai/

33.

Turow

Hennessy

Draper

Akanbi

Virgilio

(2018). Divided we feel: Partisan politics drive Americans’ emotions regarding surveillance of low-income populations. In A report from the Annenberg school for communication. University of Pennsylvania.

34.

UK Government . (2024). AI Seoul Summit 2024. Retrieved 21/5/24 from. https://aisummitseoul.com/

35.

Van Bavel

J. J.

Baicker

Boggio

P. S.

Capraro

Cichocka

Cikara

Crockett

M. J.

Crum

A. J.

Douglas

K. M.

Druckman

J. N.

Drury

Dube

Ellemers

Finkel

E. J.

Fowler

J. H.

Gelfand

Han

Haslam

S. A.

Jetten

Willer

(2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z

36.

van Gorp

(2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x

37.

WEF . (2024). World economic Forum annual meeting. World Economic Forum. Retrieved 19/1/24 from. https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/