Unveiling Public Perception and Interpretation of China’s National Self-Image: Analyzing Chinese Online Commentary Data

Abstract

This research study aims to address the oversight in previous studies that focused on constructing China’s image through the media without investigating how audiences perceive and interpret that depiction. This study aims to investigate how Chinese internet users perceive China’s self-image to understand Chinese citizens’ attitudes and reactions to political propaganda circulated by Chinese authorities online more effectively. To achieve this, we have chosen “This is China,” an online political program that presents China’s self-image. A total of 60,648 comments were collected and analyzed. For the analysis, T-LDA, Sentiment Analysis, and Semantic Network Analysis were employed. The study reveals six significant factors: Real-Life Stress, Patriotic Sentiment, Rational Emotion, Program Style, Presenter’s Public Persona, and Ironic Remarks, all of which shape the public’s perception of China’s image. Specifically, the study finds that Patriotism and Program Style have a positive influence on the audience’s perception, while the other factors hinder a favorable interpretation of the nation’s image.

Keywords

China’s self-image national image narrative audience awareness cyberpolitical communication web text analytics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anholt

(2009). The media and national image. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2009.11

Aragón

Kappler

K. E.

Kaltenbrunner

Laniado

Volkovich

(2013). Communication dynamics in Twitter during political campaigns: The case of the 2011 Spanish national election. Policy & Internet, 5(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI327

Basiri

M. E.

Nemati

Abdar

Asadi

Acharrya

U. R.

(2021). A novel fusion-based deep learning model for sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 228(11), Article 107242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107242

Bell

D. S.

(2003). Mythscapes: Memory, mythology, and national identity. British Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000045905

Brady

A. M.

(2012). “We are all part of the same family”: China’s ethnic propaganda. Journal of Current Chines Affairs, 41(4), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261204100406

Brady

A. M.

(2015). Authoritarianism goes global (II): China’s foreign propaganda machine. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0056

Buhmann

(2016). Measuring country image. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15407-3

Cambria

(2016). Affective computing and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2016.31

Carrai

M. A.

(2021). Chinese political Nostalgia and Xi Jinping’s dream of great rejuvenation. International Journal of Asian Studies, 18(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479591420000406

10.

Chang

Ren

(2018). The powerful image and the imagination of power: The ‘new visual turn’ of the CPC’s propaganda strategy since its 18th national congress in 2012. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1320682

11.

Chu

Y.-H.

Kang

Huang

M.-H.

(2015). How East Asians view the rise of China. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(93), 398–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.953810

12.

Davey

J. V. M.

(2020). Narrative, logic, contradiction: Xi Jinping’s story of China’s past, present and future. Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.25911/TM3X-R038

13.

Dijck

J. V.

Poell

(2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.12924/mac2013.01010002

14.

DiMaggio

Nag

Blei

(2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004

15.

Dong

Liang

(2017). Social media and internet public events. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3), 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.024

16.

Drieger

(2013). Semantic network analysis as a method for visual text analytics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.053

17.

Edney

(2014). Propaganda in Chinese domestic politics. In The globalization of Chinese propaganda. Asia today. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137382153_3

18.

Fan

Zhao

(2015). Topic dynamics in Weibo: A comprehensive study. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0282-0

19.

Farland-Smith

(2009). How does culture shape students’ perceptions of scientists? Cross-National comparative study of American and Chinese elementary students. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182355

20.

Feng

(2023). Multimodal Chinese discourse: Understanding communication and society in contemporary China (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003130659

21.

Fetscherin

(2010). How to brand nations, cities and destinations: A planning book for place branding. International Marketing Review, 27(4), 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011058626

22.

Goode

J. P.

(2020). Guest editor’s introduction: “Everyday nationalism in world politics: Agents, contexts, and scale”. Nationalities Papers, 48(6), 974–982. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.73

23.

Goode

J. P.

Stroup

D. R.

(2015). Everyday nationalism: Constructivism for the masses. Social Science Quarterly, 96(3), 717–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12188

24.

Goode

J. P.

Stroup

D. R.

Gaufman

(2022). Everyday nationalism in unsettled times: In search of normality during pandemic. Nationalities Papers, 50(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.40

25.

Gries

(2020). Nationalism, social influences, and Chinese foreign policy (pp. 63–84). China and the World. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190062316.003.0004

26.

Hall

(1999). Destination branding, niche marketing and national image projection in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 5(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/135676679900500303

27.

Halpern

Gibbs

(2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008

28.

Hartig

(2016). How China understands public diplomacy: The importance of national image for national interests. International Studies Review, 18(4), viw007–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw007

29.

Jiang

Wang

Ren

Zheng

(2012). Emotion ontology construction from Chinese knowledge. In Gelbukh

(Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. CICLing 2012. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 7181, pp. 603–614). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28604-9_49

30.

Kavalski

(2021). The end of China’s romance with Central and Eastern Europe. Global Media and China, 6(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436421994442

31.

Klenk

Gurol

(2023). The role of narratives for gaining domestic political legitimacy: China’s image management during COVID-19. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09865-z

32.

Knott

(2016). Everyday nationalism: A review of the literature. Studies on National Movements (SNM), 3(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.21825/snm.85398

33.

Lams

(2018). Examining strategic narratives in Chinese official discourse under Xi Jinping. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 23(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9529-8

34.

Landsberger

S. R.

(2001). Learning by what example? Educational propaganda in twenty-first-century China. Critical Asian Studies, 33(4), 541–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/146727101760107424

35.

Lee

K. M.

(2009). Nation branding and sustainable competitiveness of nations. [PhD thesis - research UT, graduation UT, University of Twente]. University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036528030

36.

Lee

L. H.

J. H.

L. C.

(2022). Chinese EmoBank: Building valence-arousal resources for dimensional sentiment analysis. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 21(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3489141

37.

Leung

(2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028

38.

(2018). The dilemma of shaping China’s national image and its countermeasures. Journal of Jishou University (Natural Sciences Edition), 39(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2018.04.015

39.

Pan

(2021). Reshaping China’s image: A corpus-based analysis of the English translation of Chinese political discourse. Perspectives, 29(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1727540

40.

Chitty

(2009). Reframing national image: A methodological framework. Conflict and communication online, 8(2), 1–11. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/319713

41.

English

A. S.

Kulich

S. J.

(2021). Anger among Chinese migrants amid COVID-19 discrimination: The role of host news coverage, cultural distance, and national identity. PLoS One, 16(11), Article e0259866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259866

42.

Liu

(2018). Popular threats and nationalistic propaganda: Political logic of China’s patriotic campaign. Security Studies, 27(4), 633–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2018.1483632

43.

Liu

Shao

(2023). Nationalist propaganda and support for war in an authoritarian context: Evidence from China. Journal of Peace Research, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433231178849

44.

Pan

(2021). Capturing clicks: How the Chinese government uses clickbait to compete for visibility. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914

45.

Maier

Waldherr

Miltner

Wiedemann

Niekler

Keinert

Pfetsch

Heyer

Reber

Häussler

Schmid-Petri

Adam

(2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754

46.

Mohr

J. W.

Bogdanov

(2013). Introduction—topic models: What they are and why they matter. Poetics, 41(6), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.10.001

47.

Muzafar

R. B.

Majid

A. K.

Tanveer

A. T.

Basant

(2020). Deep LDA : A new way to topic model. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 41(3), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2019.1616911

48.

Norris

(2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383

49.

Oliver

Christopher

(2020). Social media as passive geo-participation in transportation planning – how effective are topic modeling & sentiment analysis in comparison with citizen surveys? Geo-spatial Information Science, 23(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1815596

50.

Pamment

(2014). Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands. Public Relations Review, 40(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.019

51.

Park

Kim

E.-Y.

(2015). Online activities, digital media literacy, and networked individualism of Korean youth. Youth & Society, 47(6), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14561008

52.

Pehrson

Vignoles

V. L.

Brown

(2009). National identification and anti-immigrant prejudice: Individual and contextual effects of national definitions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200104

53.

Qiuju

Juanjuan

University

Y. S.

(2014). Research on the communication effect of mega-events on national image cognition:based on agenda-setting theory. Tourism Tribune, 29(06), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.06.005

54.

Radicioni

Squartini

Pavan

Saracco

(2021). Networked partisanship and framing: A socio-semantic network analysis of the Italian debate on migration. PLoS One, 16(8), Article e0256705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256705

55.

Roy

Das

(2023). Perceptible sentiment analysis of students’ WhatsApp group chats in valence, arousal, and dominance space. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-01016-1

56.

Ruan

(2020). Understanding China’s national identity and identifications through mediated popular culture. PhD thesis. University of Warwick. https://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3685794

57.

Seraj

(2012). We create, we connect, we respect, therefore we are: Intellectual, social, and cultural value in online communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.03.002

58.

Shambaugh

(2017). China’s propaganda system: Institutions, processes and efficacy. The China Journal, 57(57), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/tcj.57.20066240

59.

Shao

Huang

Wang

(2023). The emotional resonance and value recognition of digital memory: A short video communication study on the memory of a Chinese hero. Current Psychology, 43(15), 13654–13667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05410-6

60.

Song

(2022). Seizing the window of strategic opportunity’: A study of China’s macro–strategic narrative since the 21st century. The Social Sciences, 11(10), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100461

61.

Townsend

(1992). Chinese nationalism. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 27(27), 97–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950028

62.

Wang

(2006). Localising public diplomacy: The role of sub-national actors in nation branding. Place Branding, 2(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990043

63.

Weber

(1978). In Roth

Wittich

(Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch3

64.

Whyke

T. W.

Chen

Z. T.

Lopez-Mugica

(2022). An analysis of cultural dissemination and national image construction in Chinese influencer Li Ziqi’s vlogs and its impact on international viewer perceptions on YouTube. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00173-2

65.

Jing

(2018). Sentiment analysis using modified LDA. In Sun

Chen

Tian

(Eds.), Signal and information processing, networking and computers. ICSINC 2017. Lecture notes in electrical engineering (Vol. 473, pp. 205–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7521-6_25

66.

(2022). Documentaries and China’s national image (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003309727

67.

L.-C.

Lee

L.-H.

Hao

Wang

Lai

Zhang

(2016). Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1066

68.

Zeng

(2023). Presenting China’s image through the translation of comments: A case study of the WeChat subscription account of reference news. Perspectives, 31(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2021.1960397

69.

Zhang

(2020). Governing (through) trustworthiness: Technologies of power and subjectification in China’s social credit system. Critical Asian Studies, 52(4), 565–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1822194

70.

Zhang

(2022). Contested disaster nationalism in the digital age: Emotional registers and geopolitical imaginaries in COVID-19 narratives on Chinese social media. Review of International Studies, 48(2), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000018

71.

Zhao

Chen

J. J.

Perkins

Liu

Ding

Zou

(2015). A heuristic approach to determine an appropriate number of topics in topic modeling. BMC Bioinformatics, 16(Suppl 13), S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S13-S8

72.

Zhou

Qin

Xiang

Tan

Liu

Xiong

(2019). News text topic clustering optimized method based on TF-IDF algorithm on spark. Computers, Materials & Continua, 62(1), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.06431