Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Most messages on social media platforms are reportedly posted by a small number of active communicators, while the great majority of users remain silent as lurkers who read but seldom write. Despite extensive research to date, it remains unclear why such a disparity in individuals’ participation in social media exists. Drawing on the behavioral data of 15,633 Facebook users nested in 73 local networks, this study attempted to examine how the structural properties of networks give rise to the highly skewed distribution of message contributions between individual users. Multilevel statistical analyses of the data revealed that the participation disparity among individuals might be in part a function of the structural characteristics of networks in which they are embedded, suggesting that being active or silent in the social media environment is largely conditional on the surrounding network structures.

Keywords

cooperation lurking behavior network structure participation disparity social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreotta

Nugroho

Hurlstone

Boschetti

Farrell

Walker

Paris

(2019). Analyzing social media data: A mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, 51(4), 1766–1781. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01202-8

Balliet

(2010). Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709352443

Bonacich

(1990). Communication dilemmas in social networks: An experimental study. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095768

Bonacich

(1991). Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks, 13(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(91)90018-o

Bond

R. M.

Fariss

C. J.

Jones

Kramer

Marlow

Settle

Fowler

(2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421

Borgatti

Mehra

Brass

Labianca

(2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821

Braha

Bar-Yam

(2006). From centrality to temporary fame: Dynamic centrality in complex networks. Complexity, 12(2), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20156

Bright

L. F.

Kleiser

S. B.

Grau

S. L.

(2015). Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.048.

Burnell

George

Vollet

Ehrenreich

Underwood

(2019). Passive social networking site use and well-being: The mediating roles of social comparison and the fear of missing out. Cyberpsychology, 13(3). 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2019-3-5

10.

Burt

R. S.

(1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.

11.

Caimo

Lomi

(2015). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A Bayesian analysis of the role of reciprocity and formal structure. Journal of Management, 41(2), 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314552192

12.

Centola

(2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996), 1194–1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185231

13.

Cheshire

Antin

(2010). None of us is as lazy as all of us. Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003639858

14.

Christakis

N. A.

Fowler

J. H.

(2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa066082

15.

Christakis

N. A.

Fowler

J. H.

(2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249–2258. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0706154

16.

Cook

K. S.

Whitmeyer

J. M.

(1992). Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000545

17.

Cress

Kimmerle

Hesse

F. W.

(2009). Impact of temporal extension, synchronicity, and group size on computer-supported information exchange. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.01.010

18.

Dhir

Yossatorn

Kaur

Chen

(2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing: A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012.

19.

DiMaggio

Garip

(2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545

20.

Dunbar

R. I. M.

(2008). Cognitive constraints on the structure and dynamics of social networks. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.7

21.

Ebner

Holzinger

Catarci

(2005). Lurking: An underestimated human- computer phenomenon. IEEE Multimedia, 12(4), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/mmul.2005.74

22.

Edelmann

(2013). Reviewing the definitions of “Lurkers” and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(9), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0362

23.

Emerson

R. M.

(1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

24.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121

25.

Erikson

Occhiuto

(2017). Social networks and macrosocial change. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053633

26.

Faust

(1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks, 19(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(96)00300-0

27.

Fehr

Gintis

(2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131812

28.

Feld

S. L.

(1991). Why your friends have more friends than you do. American Journal of Sociology, 96(6), 1464–1477. https://doi.org/10.1086/229693

29.

Fox

Holt

(2018). Fear of isolation and perceived affordances: The spiral of silence on social networking sites regarding police discrimination. Mass Communication and Society, 21(5), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1442480

30.

Freeman

L. C.

(1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

31.

Gould

R. V.

(1993). Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095965

32.

Granovetter

(1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

33.

Granovetter

(1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443. https://doi.org/10.1086/226707

34.

Grolmusz

(2015). A note on the PageRank of undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 115(6–8), 633–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2015.02.015

35.

Hardin

(1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

36.

Harrigan

Achananuparp

Lim

E. P.

(2012). Influentials, novelty, and social contagion: The viral power of average friends, close communities, and old news. Social Networks, 34(4), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.005

37.

Heil

Piskorski

(2009, June 1). New twitter research: Men follow men and nobody tweets. Harvard business review. Retrieved 12. July 2018 from http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2009/06/new_twitter_research_men_follo.html

38.

Hodas

N. O.

Kooti

Lerman

(2013). Friendship paradox redux: Your friends are more interesting than you. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 225–233), Cambridge, MA, July 8–11, 2013.

39.

Hogan

(2018). Social media giveth, social media taketh away: Facebook, friendships, and APIs. International Journal of Communication, 12, 592–611.

40.

Hogg

M. A.

Reid

S. A.

(2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x

41.

Huberman

B. A.

Romero

D. M.

(2009). Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509346786

42.

Huckfeldt

Mendez

J. M.

Osborn

(2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x

43.

Kalman

M. E.

Monge

Fulk

Heino

(2002). Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communication Research, 29(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029002002

44.

Kimmerle

Cress

(2008). Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9027-z

45.

Kiss

Bichler

(2008). Identification of influencers: Measuring influence in customer networks. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.007

46.

Kollock

(1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

47.

Laumann

Marsden

Prensky

(1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In Burt

Minor

(Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 18–34). Sage.

48.

Lazer

Rubineau

Chetkovich

Katz

Neblo

(2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication, 27(3), 248–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.500187

49.

Lee

Cotte

Noseworthy

T. J.

(2010). The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.10.001

50.

Leshed

(2005). Posters, lurkers, and in between: A multidimensional model of online community participation patterns. In Salvendy

(Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th HIC International Conference, Las Vegas, NV, July 22–27, 2005. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

51.

Liang

(2018). Broadcast versus viral spreading: The structure of diffusion cascades and selective sharing on social media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy006

52.

Liang

(2016). Network redundancy and information diffusion: The impacts of information redundancy, similarity, and tie strength. Communication Research, 46(2), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216682900

53.

Ling

Beenen

Ludford

Wang

Chang

(2005). Using socialpsychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4).

54.

Liu

(2021). ‘Why are you running away from social media?’ Analysis of the factors influencing social media fatigue: An empirical data study based on Chinese youth. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 674641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674641.

55.

Lowell

B. L.

Velez

A. K.

Hano

M. C.

Sudweeks

Albrecht

Steelman

(2018). Studying networks in complex problem domains: Advancing methods in boundary specification. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.13931abstract

56.

Majchrzak

Faraj

Kane

G. C.

Azad

(2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030

57.

Malik

Pfeffer

(2016). Identifying platform effects in social media data. Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 241–249), Cologne, Germany, May 17–20, 2016.

58.

McCarty

Killworth

Rennell

(2007). Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Social Networks, 29(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.12.005

59.

McPherson

J. M.

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

60.

Merton

R. K.

(1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

61.

Rau

(2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022.

62.

Nakagawa

Schielzeth

(2012). A general and simple method for obtaining R² from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x

63.

Neelen

Fetter

(2010). Lurking: A challenge or a fruitful strategy? A comparison between lurkers and active participants in an online corporate community of practice. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 6(4), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2010.038649

64.

Newman

M. E. J.

(2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 87(25), 208701. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.89.208701

65.

Nonnecke

Andrews

Preece

(2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x

66.

O’Day

Heimberg

(2021). Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070.

67.

Osatuyi

(2015). Is lurking an anxiety-masking strategy on social media sites? The effects of lurking and computer anxiety on explaining information privacy concern on social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(8), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.062

68.

Page

S. E.

(2015). What sociologists should know about complexity. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112230

69.

Perrin

(2018, September 5). Americans are changing their relationship with Facebook. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/05/americans-are-changing-their-relationship-with-facebook/

70.

Perry

B. L.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge University Press.

71.

Polonski

Hogan

(2015). Assessing the structural correlates between friendship networks and conversational agency in facebook groups. In Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 674–677), Oxford, UK, May 26–29, 2015.

72.

Quercia

Lambiotte

Stillwell

Kosinski

Crowcroft

(2012). The personality of popular Facebook users. In Conference: CSCW’12 Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Seattle, WA, February 11–15, 2012.

73.

Rafaeli

Raban

D. R.

(2005). Information sharing online: A research challenge. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2005.006251

74.

Rau

Gao

Ding

(2008). Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2757–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.001

75.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.

76.

Ross

(1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). Academic Press.

77.

Salganik

M. J.

Dodds

P. S.

Watts

D. J.

(2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066

78.

Slater

M. D.

(2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x

79.

Sohn

(2022). Spiral of silence in the social media era: A simulation approach to the interplay between social networks and mass media. Communication Research, 49(1), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219856510

80.

Sohn

Choi

(2019). Social embeddedness of persuasion: Effects of cognitive social structures on information credibility assessment and sharing in social media. International Journal of Advertising, 38(6), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1536507

81.

Sohn

Geidner

(2016). Collective dynamics of the spiral of silence: The role of ego-network size. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 25–45.

82.

Sohn

Leckenby

(2007). A structural solution to communication dilemmas in a virtual community. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00351.x

83.

Song

Boomgaarden

H. G.

(2017). Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12288

84.

Song

Eveland

W. P.

(2015). The structure of communication networks matters: How network diversity, centrality and context influence political ambivalence, participation, and knowledge. Political Communication, 32(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.882462

85.

Swartz

(2006). Raw thought: Who writes Wikipedia. Blog article http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia

86.

Valente

T. W.

(1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Hampton Press, Inc.

87.

van Mierlo

(2014). The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: An observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), Article e33. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2966

88.

Watts

D. J.

Strogatz

S. H.

(1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(4), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

89.

Williams

D. L.

Crittenden

V. L.

Keo

McCarty

(2012). The use of social media: An exploratory study of usage among digital natives. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1414

Silence in Social Media: A Multilevel Analysis of the Network Structure Effects on Participation Disparity in Facebook

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References