A growing number of studies have suggested that partner phubbing is negatively associated with marital satisfaction. However, little is known about the mediating mechanisms between this relationship. The current study investigated whether marital interaction and marital conflict mediate the relationship between partner phubbing and marital satisfaction. A sample of 470 Chinese married adults completed questionnaires regarding demographics, partner phubbing, marital interaction, marital conflict, and marital satisfaction. The results suggested that (a) partner phubbing was negatively associated with marital satisfaction; (b) both marital interaction and marital conflict partially mediated the association between partner phubbing and marital satisfaction; and (c) marital interaction and marital conflict sequentially mediated the association between partner phubbing and marital satisfaction. These findings promote our understanding of how partner phubbing is associated with marital satisfaction.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964−980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
3.
CaoH.FangX.FineM. A.JuX.LanJ.LiuX. (2015). Beyond the average marital communication: Latent profiles of the observed interactions among Chinese newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(6), 850−862. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000126
4.
China Internet Network Information Center (2021). The 47th Statistical report on China’s Internet development. http://www.cnnic.net.cn
5.
ChotpitayasunondhV.DouglasK. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9−18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
6.
ChotpitayasunondhV.DouglasK. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304−316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
7.
ClementsM. L.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2004). Before They Said "I Do": Discriminating Among Marital Outcomes Over 13 Years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 613−626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00041.x
8.
CoyneS. M.StockdaleL.BusbyD.IversonB.GrantD. M. (2011). "I luv u :)!": A Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150−162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x
9.
DaintonM.StaffordL.CanaryD. J. (1994). Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage. Communication Reports, 7(2), 88−98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219409367591
10.
DavidM. E.RobertsJ. A. (2021). Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 63(02), 1−20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996454
11.
DengT.KanthawalaS.MengJ.PengW.KononovaA.HaoQ.ZhangQ.DavidP. (2019). Measuring smartphone usage and task switching with log tracking and self-reports. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 3−23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918761491
12.
DenzinN. K. (2008). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.
13.
DuranR. L.KellyL.RotaruT. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19−36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
14.
FinchamF. D. (2003). Marital Conflict: Correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 23−27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01215
15.
GonzalesA. L.WuY. (2016). Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in others…unless they hate cellphones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 384−398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12174
16.
Goodman-DeaneJ.MieczakowskiA.JohnsonD.GoldhaberT.ClarksonP. J. (2016). The impact of communication technologies on life and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 219−229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.053
17.
GraberE. C.LaurenceauJ.-P.MigaE.ChangoJ.CoanJ. (2011). Conflict and love: Predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(4), 541−550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024507
18.
HalesA. H.DvirM.WesselmannE. D.KrugerD. J.FinkenauerC. (2018). Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 460−473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1439877
19.
HalpernD.KatzJ. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386−394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
20.
HarrisonM. A.GilmoreA. L. (2012). U txt WHEN? College students' social contexts of text messaging. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 513−518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2012.05.003
21.
HayesA. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335−337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
22.
HeymanR. E.BrownP. D.Feldbau-KohnS. R.O'LearyK. D. (1999). Couples' communication behaviors as predictors of dropout and treatment response in wife abuse treatment programs. Behavior Therapy, 30(2), 165−189. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(99)80002-1
23.
JiaL. Z.WangZ. J.WangY. Z. (2011). A study on relationship between couples’ coping styles and their marital quality. Modern Preventive Medicine, 38(9), 1664−1666.
KadylakT.MakkiT. W.FrancisJ.CottenS. R.RikardR. V.SahY. J. (2018). Disrupted copresence: Older adults' views on mobile phone use during face-to-face interactions. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(3), 331−349. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918758129
26.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3−34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
27.
KrugerD. J.DuanA.JuhaszD.PhaneufC. V.SreenivasaV.SaundersC. M.HeyblomA. M.SonnegaP. A.DayM. L.MisevichS. L. (2017). Cell phone use latency in a midwestern USA university population. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2(1), 56−59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-017-0012-8
28.
KwonY.-A.KimD.-S. (2011). Variables influencing communication behavior escalating marital conflict: From a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 49(7), 67−80. https://doi.org/10.6115/khea.2011.49.7.067
29.
LeppA.LiJ.BarkleyJ. E.Salehi-EsfahaniS. (2015). Exploring the relationships between college students' cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 210−219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006
30.
LiuS.LingW. (2009). Multiple mediation models and their applications. Psychological Science, 32(2), 433−432.
31.
MarkmanH. J. (1981). Prediction of marital distress: A 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(5), 760−762. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.49.5.760
32.
McDanielB. T.CoyneS. M. (2016). Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers' perceptions of coparenting. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 435−443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2016.04.010
33.
McDanielB. T.DrouinM. (2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1−8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.027
34.
McDanielB. T.GalovanA. M.CravensJ. D.DrouinM. (2018). "Technoference" and implications for mothers' and fathers' couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303−313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019
35.
MelumadS.PhamM. T. (2020). The smartphone as a pacifying technology. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 237−255. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa005
36.
Miller-OttA. E.KellyL. (2016). Competing Discourses and Meaning Making in Talk about Romantic Partners' Cell-Phone Contact with Non-Present Others. Communication Studies, 67(1), 58−76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1088876
NoelleM. (2015). A culture of mutual support: The impact of giving and receiving of practical and emotional support on African American marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Social Work, 18(2), 78−89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2014.981909
39.
OlsonD. H.OlsonA. K. (1999). PREPARE/ENRICH program: version 2000. In BergerR.HannahM. T. (Eds.), Preventive approaches in couples therapy (pp. 196−216). Brunner/Mazel.
40.
OulasvirtaA.RattenburyT.MaL.RaitaE. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105−114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
41.
PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237−246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827
42.
RobertsJ. A.DavidM. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134−141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
43.
RoggeR. D.BradburyT. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 340−351. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.3.340
44.
Rosen-GrandonJ RMyersJ EHattieJ A (2004). The relationship between marital characteristics, marital interaction processes, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(1), 58−68. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00286.x
45.
SchadeL. C.SandbergJ.BeanR.BusbyD.CoyneS. (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: Effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4), 314−338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.836051
46.
SchmittM.KliegelM.ShapiroA. (2007). Marital interaction in middle and old age: A predictor of marital satisfaction?The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(4), 283−300. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.4.a
47.
SmithT. W.CribbetM. R.Nealey-MooreJ. B.UchinoB. N.WilliamsP. G.MacKenzieJ.ThayerJ. F. (2011). Matters of the variable heart: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia response to marital interaction and associations with marital quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 103−119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021136
48.
StanleyS. M.BlumbergS. L.MarkmanH. J. (1999). Helping couples fight for their marriages: The PREP approach. Preventive Approaches in Couples Therapy, 279−303.
49.
StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J.WhittonS. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41(4), 659−675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00659.x
50.
StrykerS. (1987). The vitalization of symbolic interactionism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(1), 83−94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786893
51.
TurkleS. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
52.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169−1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x
53.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.AntheunisM. L.SchoutenA. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562−569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
54.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.HendricksonA. T.PollmannM. M. H.LingR. (2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 35−47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004
55.
WangXXieXWangYWangP.LeiL (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12−17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014
56.
WangX.ZhaoF.LeiL. (2019). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology, 40, 1−11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00275-0
57.
XieX.TangX.RappH.TongD.WangP. (2020). Does forgiveness alleviate depression after being phubbed for emerging adults? The mediating role of self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106362
58.
XuX. (1996). Measuring the concept of marital quality as social indicators in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 37(2), 189−206
