Proximate or Primary Source? How Multiple Layers of News Sources on Social Media Predict News Influence

Abstract

News shared on social media presents multiple layers of sources, from reputable news organizations to individual users who share news on social media. A web-based experiment investigated (a) whether the influence of a primary news source (news organization) on viewers decreases as it becomes less proximate with the presence of a more immediate source (individual user who shared news), and (b) if so, how the evaluations of both sources, along with a varying degree of issue relevance, affect viewers’ agreement with news position. Participants read one news article either shared on Facebook by a well-known celebrity or directly posted onto a news website. The perceived credibility of news organizations predicted viewers’ agreement with the news position, but only when the news was presented on a news web page so that the news organization was shown as the proximate source. When multiple sources were displayed, the influence of news organization credibility disappeared when the given news lacked personal relevance.

Keywords

social media news sharing source credibility news influence proximity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkin

C. K.

(1972). Anticipated communication and mass media information-seeking. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/267991

Bialik

Matsa

K. E.

(2017, October 4). Key trends in social and digital news media. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/04/key-trends-in-social-and-digital-news-media/

Chaiken

(1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Chang

Jeon

(2020). The impact of motivation for the news consumption on SNS by news content type: Through verification of the mediation effect of participation behavior. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 104, 84–121.

Choi

(2016). Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens’ news-related activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.006

Flanagin

A. J.

(2017). Online social influence and the convergence of mass and interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 43, 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12116

Gaziano

McGrath

(1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 63, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300301

Gottfried

Shearer

(2017, September 7). Americans’ online news use in closing in on TV news use. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/07/americans-online-news-use-vs-tv-news-use/

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.

10.

Johnson

T. J.

Kaye

B. K.

(2014). Site effects: How reliance on social media influences confidence in the government and news media. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314537029

11.

Kang

Bae

Zhang

Sundar

S. S.

(2011). Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800403

12.

Katz

Blumler

J. G.

Gurevitch

(1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In Blumler

J. G.

Katz

(Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Sage.

13.

Katz

Lazarsfeld

P. F.

(1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Free Press.

14.

Kim

Dennis

A. R.

(2019). Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/15188

15.

Korea Press Foundation. (2020). Media users in Korea 2020. Retrieved April 6, 2020, from https://www.kpf.or.kr/front/research/consumerDetail.do

16.

Krosnick

J. A.

Boninger

D. S.

Chuang

Y. C.

Berent

M. K.

Carnot

C. G.

(1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132

17.

Lee

C. S.

(2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002

18.

Lee

E.-J.

Jang

Y. J.

(2010). What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37, 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210376189

19.

Maheswaran

Meyers-Levy

(1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172593

20.

Matsa

K. E.

(2016, September 14). 10 Facts about the changing digital news landscape. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/14/facts-about-the-changing-digital-news-landscape/

21.

Meyer

(2009). The vanishing newspaper: Saving journalism in the information age. University of Missouri Press.

22.

Morris

J. D.

Choi

(2016). Are social marketing and advertising communications (SMACs) meaningful? A survey of Facebook user emotional responses, source credibility, personal relevance, and perceived intrusiveness. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 37, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2016.1171182

23.

Nekmat

Gower

K. K.

Gonzenbach

W. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

(2015). Source effects in the micro-mobilization of collective action via social media. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1076–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1018301

24.

Newhagen

Nass

(1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 66, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600202

25.

O’Keefe

D. J.

(2002). Persuasion: Theory & research. Sage.

26.

O’Sullivan

P. B.

(1999). Bridging the mass-interpersonal divide: Synthesis scholarship in HCR. Human Communication Research, 25, 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00462.x

27.

O’Sullivan

P. B.

Carr

C. T.

(2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20, 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104

28.

Oeldorf-Hirsch

DeVoss

C. L.

(2020). Who posted that story? Processing layered sources in Facebook news posts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857673

29.

Park

C. S.

Kaye

B. K.

(2019). Mediating roes of news curation and news elaboration in the relationship between social media use for news and political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63, 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653070

30.

Pearson

(2020). Sources on social media: Information context collapse and volume of content as predictors of source blindness. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910505

31.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.

32.

Pornpitakpan

(2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x

33.

Reardon

K. K.

Rogers

E. M.

(1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15, 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00185.x

34.

Reeves

Nass

(1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications.

35.

Roskos-Ewoldsen

D. R.

Bichsel

Hoffman

(2002). The influence of accessibility of source likeability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1492

36.

Shearer

Gottfried

(2017, September 7). News use across social media platforms 2017. http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/

37.

Singer

J. B.

(2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16, 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833

38.

Sterrett

Malato

Benz

Kantor

Tompson

Rosenstiel

Sonderman

Loker

(2019). Who shared it? Deciding what news to trust on social media. Digital Journalism Who Shared it?: Deciding What News to Trust on Social Media, 7, 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623702

39.

Sundar

S. S.

Nass

C. I.

(2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.x

40.

Swart

Peters

Broersma

(2019). Sharing and discussing news in private social media groups: The social function of news and current affairs in location-based, work-oriented and leisure-focused communities. Digital Journalism, 7, 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1465351

41.

Tandoc

E. C.

(2019). Tell me who your sources are: Perceptions of news credibility on social media. Journalism Practice, 13, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1423237

42.

Todorov

Chaiken

Henderson

M. D.

(2002). The heuristic–systematic model of social information processing. In Dillard

J. P.

Pfau

(Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195–213). Sage.

43.

Turcotte

York

Irving

Scholl

R. M.

Pingree

R. J.

(2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects of media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127

44.

van Noort

Antheunis

M. L.

van Reijmersdal

E. A.

(2012). Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. Journal of Marketing Communication, 18, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2011.620764

45.

Walther

J. B.

DeAndrea

Kim

Anthony

J. C.

(2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x

46.

West

D. M.

(1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100115

47.

Yun

G. W.

Park

S.-Y.

Lee

Flynn

M. A.

(2018). Hostile media or hostile source? Bias perception of shared news. Social Science Computer Review, 36, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316684481