Mobile Phones Will Not Eliminate Digital and Social Divides: How Variation in Internet Activities Mediates the Relationship Between Type of Internet Access and Local Social Capital in Detroit
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Mobile Phones Will Not Eliminate Digital and Social Divides: How Variation in Internet Activities Mediates the Relationship Between Type of Internet Access and Local Social Capital in Detroit
This study examines the relationship between mode of Internet access, variety of online activities, and the potential for the Internet to contribute to local social capital in distressed, urban communities. Based on a sample of 525 telephone surveys in Detroit, findings show that breadth of access predicts participation in a larger variety of online activities, which is associated with higher levels of local social capital. Neither public Internet access, home broadband, nor Internet access through a mobile phone data plan alone affords participation in a full range of social capital-enhancing activities. The findings highlight the potential problems of initiatives that assume equivalent social outcomes through nonequivalent modes of access, such as providing Internet access through mobile phones in place of home broadband. Efforts to enhance a city’s social infrastructure by providing Internet access are best served when individuals have multiple points of access available.
AlwittL. F.DonleyT. D. (1997). Retail stores in poor urban neighborhoods. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(1), 139–164.
2.
AmbleeN.BuiT. (2011). Harnessing the influence of social proof in online shopping: The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales of digital microproducts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 91–114.
3.
AppelL.DadlaniP.DwyerM.HamptonK. N.KitzieV.MatniZ. A.MooreP.TeodoroR. (2014). Testing the validity of social capital measures in the study of information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 398–416.
4.
ArmentaÁ.SerranoA.CabreraM.ConteR. (2012). The new digital divide: The confluence of broadband penetration, sustainable development, technology adoption and community participation. Information Technology for Development, 18(4), 345–353.
5.
Ball-RokeachS. J.KimY. C.MateiS. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 429–463.
BertotJ. C.RealB.JaegerP. T. (2016). Public libraries building digital inclusive communities: Data and findings from the 2013 digital inclusion survey. The Library Quarterly, 86(3), 270–289.
8.
BobkowskiP. S.JiangL.PeterlinL. J.RodriguezN. J. (2019). Who gets vocal about hyperlocal. Journalism Practice, 13(2), 159–177.
9.
BourdieuP. (2002). The forms of capital. In BiggartN. W. (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology (pp. 280–291). Blackwell Publishers.
10.
BrownK.CampbellS. W.LingR. (2011). Mobile phones bridging the digital divide for teens in the US?Future Internet, 3(2), 144–158.
11.
BuschmanJ. (2018). On democracy and libraries. The Library Quarterly, 88(1), 23–40.
12.
ChircuA. M.MahajanV. (2009). Perspective: Revisiting the digital divide: An analysis of mobile technology depth and service breadth in the BRIC countries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 455–466.
13.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
14.
DaileyD.BryneA.PowellA.KaraganisJ.ChungJ. (2010). Broadband adoption in low-income communities. Social Science Research Council.
15.
DavisJ. L.ChouinardJ. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(4), 241–248.
16.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys. John Wiley.
17.
DiMaggioP.HargittaiE. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Sociology Department, Princeton University.
18.
DixonL. J.CorreaT.StraubhaarJ.CovarrubiasL.GraberD.SpenceJ.RojasV. (2014). Gendered space: The digital divide between male and female users in internet public access sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 991–1009.
19.
DobranskyK.HargittaiE. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28.
20.
DohaA.ElnahlaN.McShaneL. (2019). Social commerce as social networking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 307–321.
21.
DotsonT. (2017). Technically together: Reconsidering community in a networked world. MIT Press.
22.
DunawayJ.SearlesK.SuiM.PaulN. (2018). News attention in a mobile era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2), 107–124.
23.
DuttonW. H.BlankG. (2013). Cultures of the internet: The internet in Britain. Oxford internet survey 2013 report. Oxford Internet Institute.
24.
DuttonW. H.BlankG. (2014). The emergence of next generation internet users. International Economics and Economic Policy, 11(1–2), 29–47.
25.
DuttonW. H.ReisdorfB. C. (2019). Cultural divides and digital inequalities: Attitudes shaping internet and social media divides. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 18–38.
26.
EtumnuC. E.FosterK. A.WidmarN. O.LuskJ. L.OrtegaD. L. (2019). Drivers of online grocery shopping (No. 290858). Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
27.
GadS.RamakrishnanN.HamptonK. N.KavanaughA. (2012, December). Bridging the divide in democratic engagement: Studying conversation patterns in advantaged and disadvantaged communities. Social Informatics (SocialInformatics), 2012 International Conference on IEEE (pp. 165–176). IEEE.
28.
GohD.LingR.HuangL.LiewD. (2019). News sharing as reciprocal exchanges in social cohesion maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 22(8), 1128–1144.
29.
GonzalesA. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248.
30.
GonzalesA.EmsL.SuriV. R. (2016). Cell phone disconnection disrupts access to healthcare and health resources. New Media & Society18(6), 1422–1438.
HaleT. M.GoldnerM.SternM.DrenteaP.CottenS. R. (2014). Patterns of online health searching 2002–2010: Implications for social capital, health disparities and the de-professionalization of medical knowledge. In KronenfeldJ. J. (Ed.), Technology, communication, disparities and government options in health and health care services (pp. 35–60). Emerald Group Publishing.
33.
HamptonK. N. (2003). Grieving for a lost network: Collective action in a wired suburb. The Information Society, 19(5), 417–428.
34.
HamptonK. N. (2007). Neighborhoods in the network society: The e-neighbors study. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 714–748.
35.
HamptonK. N. (2010). Internet use and the concentration of disadvantage. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1111–1132.
36.
HamptonK. N. (2011). Comparing bonding and bridging ties for democratic engagement: Everyday use of communication technologies within social networks for civic and civil behaviors. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 510–528.
37.
HamptonK. N.LeeC.HerE. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1031–1049.
38.
HamptonK. N.LivioO.Sessions GouletL. (2010). The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 701–722.
39.
HamptonK. N.Sessions GouletL. S.RainieL.PurcellK. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 16, 1–85.
40.
HamptonK. NWellmanB. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277–311.
41.
HamptonK. N.WellmanB. (2018). Lost and saved…again: The moral panic about the loss of community takes hold of social media. Contemporary Sociology, 47(6), 643–651.
HargittaiE.PiperA. M.MorrisM. R. (2019). From internet access to internet skills: Digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(4), 881–890.
44.
HargreavesI.HartleyJ. (Eds.). (2016). The creative citizen unbound: How social media and DIY culture contribute to democracy, communities and the creative economy. Policy Press.
45.
HassaniS. N. (2006). Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else. Poetics, 34(4), 250–272.
46.
HayesA. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
47.
HoogerbruggeM. M.BurgerM. J. (2018). Neighborhood-based social capital and life satisfaction: The case of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Urban Geography, 39(10), 1484–1509.
48.
HristovaD.WilliamsM. J.MusolesiM.PanzarasaP.MascoloC. (2016). Measuring urban social diversity using interconnected geo-social networks [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, Montreal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883065
49.
KatzV. S.MoranM. B.OgnyanovaK. (2019). Contextualizing connectivity: How internet connection type and parental factors influence technology use among lower-income children. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 313–335.
50.
KavanaughA.PuckettA.TatarD. (2013). Scaffolding technology for low literacy groups: From mobile phone to desktop PC?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4), 274–288.
51.
KelleyM. J. (2014). Urban experience takes an informational turn: Mobile internet usage and the unevenness of geosocial activity. GeoJournal, 79(1), 15–29.
52.
KimY. C.LimJ. Y.ParkK. (2015). Effects of health literacy and social capital on health information behavior. Journal of Health Communication, 20(9), 1084–1094.
53.
KimY. C.ShinE.ChoA.JungE.ShonK.ShimH. (2019). SNS dependency and community engagement in urban neighborhoods: The moderating role of integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network. Communication Research, 46(1), 7–32.
54.
KimY. L. (2018). Seoul’s Wi-Fi hotspots: Wi-Fi access points as an indicator of urban vitality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 72, 13–24.
55.
KlinenbergE. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Broadway Books.
KumarD.HemmigeV.KallenM. A.GiordanoT. P.AryaM. (2019). Mobile phones may not bridge the digital divide: A look at mobile phone literacy in an underserved patient population. Cureus, 11(2), e4104–e4104.
59.
KyemP. A. K.LeMaireP. K. (2006). Transforming recent gains in the digital divide into digital opportunities: Africa and the boom in mobile phone subscription. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 28(1), 1–16.
60.
LaiC.ChenW. (2016). Welcome to the club: From multimodal voluntary participation to community involvement. International Journal of Communication, 10(25), 3931–3955.
61.
LeeH.ParkN.HwangY. (2015). A new dimension of the digital divide: Exploring the relationship between broadband connection, smartphone use and communication competence. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 45–56.
62.
LivingstoneS.HelsperE. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671–696.
63.
MaassR.KloecknerC. A.LindstrømB.LillefjellM. (2016). The impact of neighborhood social capital on life satisfaction and self-rated health: A possible pathway for health promotion?Health & Place, 42, 120–128.
64.
MarlerW. (2018). Mobile phones and inequality: Findings, trends, and future directions. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3498–3520.
65.
MascheroniG.ÓlafssonK. (2016). The mobile internet: Access, use, opportunities and divides among European children. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1657–1679.
66.
MeschG. S. (2012). Minority status and the use of computer-mediated communication: A test of the social diversification hypothesis. Communication Research, 39(3), 317–337.
67.
MeschG. S.LevanonY. (2003). Community networking and locally-based social ties in two suburban localities. City & Community, 2(4), 335–351.
68.
MooreM. D.ReckerN. L. (2017). Social capital groups and crime in urban counties. Deviant Behavior, 38(6), 655–667.
69.
MosconiG.KornM.ReuterC.TolmieP.TeliM.PipekV. (2017). From Facebook to the neighbourhood: Infrastructuring of hybrid community engagement. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(4), 959–1003.
70.
MossbergerK.TolbertC. J.HamiltonA. (2012). Broadband adoption| measuring digital citizenship: Mobile access and broadband. International Journal of Communication, 6, 37.
NandiS.ThotaS.NagA.DivyasukhanandaS.GoswamiP.AravindakshanA.RodriguezR.MukherjeeB. (2016). Computing for rural empowerment: enabled by last-mile telecommunications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(6), 102–109.
73.
NapoliP. M.ObarJ. A. (2014). The emerging mobile internet underclass: A critique of mobile internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334.
74.
NorrisP. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29(3), 474–480.
75.
NorrisP. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
76.
PageC.RidgwayN. (2001). The impact of consumer environments on consumption patterns of children from disparate socioeconomic backgrounds. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(1), 21–40.
77.
ParkY. J. (2015). My whole world’s in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill. New Media & Society, 17(6), 977–995.
78.
PearceK. E.RiceR. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744.
PowellL. M.SlaterS.MirtchevaD.BaoY.ChaloupkaF. J. (2007). Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Preventive Medicine, 44(3), 189–195.
82.
PrzybylskiA. K.OrbenA.WeinsteinN. (2019). How much is too much? Examining the relationship between digital screen engagement and psychosocial functioning in a confirmatory cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.017
83.
PuspitasariL.IshiiK. (2016). Digital divides and mobile internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 472–483.
84.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone. Simon & Schuster.
85.
RagneddaM.MuschertG. W. (2013). The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge.
86.
RhinesmithC. (2012). Free library hot spots: Supporting broadband adoption in Philadelphia’s low-income communities. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2529–2554.
87.
RiceR. E. (2006). Influences, usage, and outcomes of internet health information searching. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(1), 8–28.
88.
RogersE. M. (2001). The digital divide. Convergence, 7(4), 96–111.
89.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
90.
ShahD. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 469–496.
91.
ShahD. V.KwakN. R.HolbertL. D. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141–162.
92.
SkoricM. M.ZhuQ.GohD.PangN. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1817–1839.
SternM. J.AdamsA. E.ElsasserS. (2009). Digital inequality and place: The effects of technological diffusion on internet proficiency and usage across rural, suburban, and urban counties. Sociological Inquiry, 79(4), 391–417.
95.
TsaiH. Y. S.LaRoseR. (2015). Broadband internet adoption and utilization in the inner city: A comparison of competing theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 344–355.
96.
TsetsiE.RainsS. A. (2017). Smartphone internet access and use: Extending the digital divide and usage gap. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(3), 239–255.
97.
TurkleS. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.
Van der GaagM.SnijdersT. A. (2005). The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks, 27(1), 1–29.
100.
Van DeursenA. J.HelsperE. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide. In RobinsonL.CottenS. R.SchulzJ.HaleT. M.WilliamsA. (Eds). Communication and Information Technologies Annual (pp. 29–52). Emerald Group Publishing.
101.
Van DeursenA. J.HelsperE.EynonR.Van DijkJ. A. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 452–473.
102.
Van DeursenA. J.Van DijkJ. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375.
103.
WangL.LiuC. (2018). The mobile internet underclass: Reality or hyperbole?Journal of Information Science, 44(5), 569–579.
WijetungaD. (2014). The digital divide objectified in the design: Use of the mobile telephone by underprivileged youth in Sri Lanka. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 712–726.
106.
WillisK. S. (2017). Netspaces: Space and place in a networked world. Routledge.
107.
ZillienN.HargittaiE. (2009). Digital distinction: Status specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
