We point to a popular yet underresearched platform of political information, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Considering the supply side of the marketplace, we argue that personal biographies on the platform are an attractive medium for politicians to enhance their appearance. We trace changes to biographies coming from the parliament using data that cover the entire edit histories for biographies on all German members of parliament for the three last legislative periods. Our findings show editing of personal biographies to be a persistent phenomenon. Moreover, type, timing, and driving factors of editing behavior highlight the importance politicians’ attribute to Wikipedia for pursuing reelection. Our results speak to the domains of political professionalization, voting behavior, and the general measurement of communicative patterns.
BernauerJ.MunzertS. (2014). Loyal to the game? Strategic policy representation in mixed electoral systems. Representation, 50, 83–97.
2.
BrownA. R. (2011). Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: Accuracy and completeness of coverage. Political Science and Politics, 44, 339–343.
3.
BrundidgeJ.RiceR. E. (2009). Political engagement online: Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar? In ChadwickA.HowardP. N. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 144–156). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
4.
CareyJ. M.ShugartM. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14, 417–439.
5.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
6.
DahlgrenP. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication. Political Communication, 22, 147–162.
DruckmanJ. N.JacobsL. R. (2015). Who governs? Presidents, public opinion, and manipulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
DruckmanJ. N.KiferM. J.ParkinM. (2007). The technological development of congressional candidate web sites. How and why candidates use web innovations. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 425–442.
10.
DruckmanJ. N.KiferM. J.ParkinM. (2009). Campaign communications in U.S. Congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 103, 343–366.
11.
DruckmanJ. N.ParkinM. (2005). The impact of media bias. How editorial slant affects voters. Journal of Politics, 67, 1030–1049.
12.
FennoR. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
13.
FerraraF.HerronE. S.NishikawaM. (2005). Mixed electoral systems. Contamination and its consequences. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
GibsonR. K.McAllisterI. (2011). Do online election campaigns win votes? The 2007 Australian “YouTube” election. Political Communication, 28, 227–244.
15.
GilesJ. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.
16.
GschwendT. (2007). Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules. Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 1–23.
17.
HirczyW. (1994). The impact of mandatory voting laws on turnout. A quasi-experimental approach. Electoral Studies, 43, 72–84.
18.
JungM.SchrothY.WolfA. (2010). Wählerverhalten und Wahlergebnis: Regierungswechsel ohne Wechselstimmung. In KorteK.-R. (Ed.), Die Bundestagswahl 2009: Analysen der Wahl-, Parteien-, Kommunikations- und Regierungsforschung (pp. 35–47). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
19.
KallaJ. L.AronowP. M. (2015). Editorial bias in crowd-sourced political information. PLoS One, 10, e0136327.
20.
KingG. (1988). Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential poisson regression model. Americal Journal of Political Science, 32, 838–863.
21.
KoruppS. E.SzydlikM. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21, 409–422.
22.
LassenD. S.BrownA. R. (2011). Twitter: The electoral connection. Social Science Computer Review, 29, 419–436.
23.
LiebermanM. D.LinJ. (2009). You are where you edit: Locating Wikipedia contributors through edit histories. Paper presented at the third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’09), San Jose, CA.
24.
MayhewD. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
MesgariM.OkoliC.MehdiM.NielsenF. A.LanamäkiA. (2015). ‘The sum of all human knowledge’: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 219–245.
27.
MillerJ. M.KrosnickJ. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301–315.
28.
MunzertS.RubbaC.MeißnerP.NyhuisD. (2015). Automated data collection with R: A practical guide to web scraping and text mining. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
29.
NeffJ. J.LaniadoD.KapplerK. E.VolkovichY.AragónP.KaltenbrunnerA. (2013). Jointly they edit: Examining the impact of community identification on political interaction in Wikipedia. PLoS One, 8, e60584.
RiehleD. (2006, 821–23). How and why Wikipedia works: An interview with Angela Beesley, Elisabeth Bauer, and Kizu Naoko. Paper presented at WikiSym’06, Odense, Denmark.
32.
SchleifeK. (2010). What really matters. Regional versus individual determinants of the digital divide in Germany. Research Policy, 39, 173–185.
33.
SchroederR.TaylorL. (2015). Big data and Wikipedia research: Social science knowledge across disciplinary divides. Information, Communication and Society, 18, 1039–1056.
34.
StratmannT.BaurM. (2002). Plurality rule, proportional representation, and the German Bundestag. How incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 506–514.
35.
SumiR.YasseriT.RungA.KertészJ. (2012). Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia. PLoS One, 7, e38869.
36.
UtzS. (2009). The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 221–243.
37.
ZittelT. (2015). Do candidates seek personal votes on the Internet? Constituency candidates in the 2009 German federal election. German Politics, 24, 435–450.
38.
ZittelT.GschwendT. (2008). Individualised constituency campaigns in mixed-member electoral systems: Candidates in the 2005 German elections. West European Politics, 31, 978–1003.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
