This study investigates Arab researchers’ attitudes and perceptions toward the use of academic social networks (ASNs), with a sharp topical focus on the ResearchGate (RG) network. From six Arab universities, a sample of 2,991 Arab researchers was invited to participate in the survey. The research instrument was a web-based questionnaire. In total, 315 participants filled out the questionnaire. The study reveals that three quarters of the respondents use ASNs to share publications, and most researchers subscribed to more than one ASN, but RG was the most frequently used one. Academic discipline appears to play a role in defining Arab researchers within RG, as the majority of them were from the pure and applied sciences.
AlmousaO. (2011, 12). Users’ classification and usage-pattern identification in academic social networks. In 2011 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT) (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: IEEE.
5.
ArdaZ. (2012, especial octubre). Academicians on online social networks: Visibility of academic research and amplification of audience. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 18, 67–75.
6.
BullingerA.HallerstedeS.RenkenU.SoeldnerJ. H.MösleinK. (2010, 8). Towards research collaboration—a taxonomy of social research network sites. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (p. 92). Retrieved fromhttp://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/92
HoffmannC. P.LutzC.MeckelM. (2014, 1). Impact factor 2.0: Applying social network analysis to scientific impact assessment. In 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 (pp. 1576–1585), IEEE. Retrieved fromhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6758799
JengW.HeD.JiangJ. (2015), User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 890–904.
MurrayM. (2014). Analysis of a scholarly social networking site: The case of the dormant user. SAIS 2014 Proceedings. Paper 24. Retrieved fromhttp://aisel.aisnet.org/sais2014/24
19.
NándezG.BorregoÁ. (2013). The use of social networks for academic purposes: A case study. Electronic Library, 31, 781–791.
OrtegaJ. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 39–49.
SweilehW. M.ZyoudS. H.Al-KhalilS.Al-JabiS. W.SawalhaA. F. (2014). Assessing the scientific research productivity of the Palestinian higher education institutions: A case study at An-Najah National University, Palestine. SAGE Open, 4, 1–11. Retrieved fromhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/2193-1801-3-427.pdf
24.
ThelwallM.KoushaK. (2014a). Academia.edu: Social network or academic network?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 721–731.
25.
ThelwallM.KoushaK. (2014b). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved fromhttp://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/∼cm1993/papers/ResearchGate.pdf
