Academic productivity is realized through resources obtained from professional networks in which scientists are embedded. Using a national survey of academic faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields across multiple institution types, we examine how the structure of professional networks affects scholarly productivity and how those effects may differ by race, ethnicity, and gender. We find that network size masks important differences in composition. Using negative binomial regression, we find that both the size and composition of professional networks affect scientific productivity, but bigger is not always better. We find that instrumental networks increase scholarly productivity, while advice networks reduce it. There are important interactive effects that are masked by modeling only direct effects. We find that white men are especially advantaged by instrumental networks, and women are especially advantaged by advice networks.
BaezBenjamin. 2000. “Race-related Service and Faculty of Color: Conceptualizing Critical Agency in Academe.” Higher Education39 (3): 363–91.
2.
BecherTony. 1994. “The Significance of Disciplinary Differences.” Studies in Higher Education19 (2): 151–16. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007.
3.
BorgattiStephen P.FosterPacey C.. 2003. “The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology.” Journal of Management29 (6): 991–1013.
4.
BowlegLisa. 2008. “When Black + Lesbian + Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research.” Sex Roles59 (5-6): 312–25.
5.
BozemanBarryCorleyElizabeth. 2004. “Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy33 (4): 599–616. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008.
6.
BrassDaniel J.1992. “Power in Organizations: A Social Network Perspective.” Research in Politics and Society4 (1): 295–323.
7.
BrownBryan A.ParsonsEileenMilesRheaBryan HendersonJ.. 2013. “Exploring the Alignment of African American Scientists with the American Scientific Community: Does Race Still Matter?” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering19 (2): 95–120.
8.
BrowneIreneMisraJoya. 2003. “The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market.” Annual Review of Sociology29: 487–513. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016.
9.
BurtRonald S. 2000. “The Network Structure of Social Capital.” Research in Organizational Behavior22: 345–423. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1.
CombsGwendolyn M.2003. “The Duality of Race and Gender for Managerial African American Women: Implications of Informal Social Networks on Career Advancement.” Human Resource Development Review2 (4): 385–405.
16.
CrenshawKimberlee Williams. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43 (6): 1241–99. doi: 10.2307/1229039.
17.
DavisKathy. 2008. “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.” Feminist Theory9 (1): 67–85.
18.
EtzkowitzHenryKemelgorCarolUzziBrian. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
FagenAdam P.OlsonSteven, Eds. 2007. Understanding Interventions That Encourage Minorities to Pursue Research Careers: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
FoxMary Frank. 1983. “Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review.” Social Studies of Science13 (2): 285–305. doi: 10.1177/030631283013002005.
21.
FoxMary Frank. 2005. “Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists.” Social Studies of Science35 (1): 131–50. doi: 10.1177/0306312705046630.
22.
FoxMary Frank. 2015. “Gender and Clarity of Evaluation among Academic Scientists in Research Universities.” Science, Technology, & Human Values40 (4): 487–515. doi: 10.1177/0162243914564074.
23.
FoxMary FrankMohapatraSushanta. 2007. “Social-organizational Characteristics of Work and Publication Productivity among Academic Scientists in Doctoral-granting Departments.” The Journal of Higher Education78 (5): 542–71. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2007.11772329.
24.
FreemanRichard B.HuangWei. 2014. Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Co-authorship within the US. No. w19905, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
GaughanMonicaBozemanBarry. 2016. “Using the Prisms of Gender and Rank to Interpret Research Collaboration Power Dynamics.” Social Studies of Science46 (4): 536–58. doi: 10.1177/0306312716652249.
26.
GintherDonna K.KahnShulamit. 2006. Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001. No. w12691, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
27.
GintherDonna K.SchafferWalter T.SchnellJoshuaMasimoreBethLiuFayeHaakLaurel L.KingtonRaynard. 2011. “Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards.” Science333 (6045): 1015–19. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.
28.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78 (6): 1360–80. doi: 10.1086/225469.
29.
GranovetterMark S.2005. “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives19 (1): 33–50.
30.
HongWeiZhaoYandong. 2016. “How Social Networks Affect Scientific Performance: Evidence from a National Survey of Chinese Scientists.” Science, Technology, & Human Values41 (2): 243–73. doi: 10.1177/0162243915592020.
31.
IbarraHerminia. 1992. “Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure and Access in an Advertising Firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly37 (3): 422–47. doi: 10.2307/2393451.
32.
IbarraHerminia. 1993. “Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework.” Academy of Management Review18 (1): 56–87. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1993.3997507.
33.
KatzJ. SylvanMartinBen R.. 1997. “What is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy26 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.
34.
LeaheyErin. 2006. “Gender Differences in Productivity: Research Specialization as a Missing Link.” Gender & Society20 (6): 754–80. doi: 10.1177/0891243206293030.
35.
LeggonCheryl B.2006. “Women in Science: Racial and Ethnic Differences and the Differences they Make.” The Journal of Technology Transfer31 (3): 325–33.
36.
LevinSharon G.StephanPaula E.. 1989. “Age and Research Productivity of Scientists.” Research in Higher Education30 (5): 531–49.
37.
LinNan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LongJ. ScottAllisonPaul D.McGinnisRobert. 1993. “Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity.” American Sociological Review58 (5): 703–22.
39.
MalcomLindsey E.MalcomShirley M.. 2011. “The Double Bind: The Next Generation.” Harvard Educational Review18 (2): 162–71. doi: 10.17763/haer.81.2.a84201x508406327.
40.
MamiseishviliKetevanRosserVicki J.. 2010. “International and Citizen Faculty in the United States: An Examination of their Productivity at Research Universities.” Research in Higher Education51 (1): 88–107.
41.
MarsdenPeter V.1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review52 (1): 122–31.
42.
MatchettKarin, Ed. 2013. Seeking Solutions: Maximizing American Talent by Advancing Women of Color in Academia: Summary of a Conference. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
43.
McCallLeslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30 (3): 1771–800.
44.
MehraAjayKilduffMartinBrassDaniel J.. 1998. “At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups.” Academy of Management Journal41 (4): 441–52.
45.
MillerB. PaigeShrumWesley. 2012. “Isolated in a Technologically Connected World? Changes in the Core Professional Ties of Female Researchers in Ghana, Kenya, and Kerala, India.” The Sociological Quarterly53 (2): 143–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01229.x.
46.
MooreGwen. 1990. “Structural Determinants of Men’s and Women’s Personal Networks.” American Sociological Review55 (5): 726–35.
47.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 2009. Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
48.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 2010. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
49.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2015. “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015.” Special Report, NSF 15-11,Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
50.
O’BrienTimothy L.2012. “Change in Academic Coauthorship, 1953–2003.” Science, Technology, & Human Values37 (3): 210–34. doi: 10.1177/0162243911406744.
51.
PearsonWilliePearsonLaRue C.. 1985. “Baccalaureate Origins of African American Scientists: A Cohort Analysis.” The Journal of Negro Education54 (1): 24–34.
52.
PernaLaura W.2001. “Sex and Race Differences in Faculty Tenure and Promotion.” Research in Higher Education42 (5): 541–67.
53.
PinheiroDiogo LemieszekMelkersJulia E.. 2011. “The Need to Look Elsewhere: The Push and Pull of Underrepresented Minority Faculty Professional Networks.” Science and Innovation Policy, 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation, Atlanta: IEEE.
54.
PodolnyJoel M.BaronJames N.. 1997. “Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace.” American Sociological Review62 (5): 673–93.
55.
RenzulliLinda A.AldrichHowardMoodyJames. 2000. “Family Matters: Gender, Networks, and Entrepreneurial Outcomes.” Social Forces79 (2): 523–46. doi: 10.1093/sf/79.2.523.
56.
RenzulliLinda A.ReynoldsJeremyKellyKimberlyGrantLinda. 2013. “Pathways to Gender Inequality in Faculty Pay: The Impact of Institution, Academic Division, and Rank.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility34:58–72. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2013.08.004.
57.
SabharwalMeghnaCorleyElizabeth A.. 2008. “Categorization of Minority Groups in Academic Science and Engineering.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering14 (4): 427–46. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v14.i4.50.
58.
ToutkoushianRobert K.BellasMarcia L.. 1999. “Faculty Time Allocations and Research Productivity: Gender, Race and Family Effects.” The Review of Higher Education22 (4): 367–90. doi: 10.1353/rhe.1999.0014.
59.
ToutkoushianRobert K.ConleyValerie Martin. 2005. “Progress for Women in Academe, Yet Inequities Persist: Evidence from NSOPF 99.” Research in Higher Education46 (1): 1–28.
60.
TurnerCaroline Sotello Viernes. 2002. “Women of Color in Academe: Living with Multiple Marginality.” The Journal of Higher Education73 (1): 74–93. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2002.11777131.
61.
WeldonS. Laurel. 2008. “Intersectionality.” In Politics, Gender and Concepts: Theory and Methodology, edited by GoertzGaryMazurAmy, 193–218. New York: Cambridge University Press.
XieYuShaumanKimberlee A.. 1998. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle.” American Sociological Review63 (6): 847–70.
64.
YnalvezMarcus AntoniusShrumWesley M.. 2011. “Professional Networks, Scientific Collaboration, and Publication Productivity in Resource-constrained Research Institutions in a Developing Country.” Research Policy40 (2): 204–16. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.004.
