This article focuses on the persistence of the digital divide and its impact on political participation, and in particular, on the role that geographic location plays in unequal access. The authors findings, based on survey data from the 2007 Pew Internet and American Life project, indicate that physical location continues to play a key role in levels of access to broadband technology and that increased home Internet use is associated with a significantly higher probability of contacting government officials in various ways.
Arrison, S. ( 2003). Why digital dividers are out of step. Heartland Institute: Infotech and Telecom News. Retrieved from http://www.heartland.org/publications/infotech%20telecom/article/13330/Why_Digital_Dividers_are_Out_of_Step.html Retrieved 4/3/09.
2.
Best, S.J., & Krueger, B.S. ( 2005). Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27, 183-216.
3.
Bimber, B. ( 2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for the effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 53-67.
4.
Brady, H.E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K.L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation (Socioeconomic Status As Explanation for Political Activity). American Political Science Review, 89, 271-294.
5.
Brants, K., Huizenga, M., & Lehman, K. ( 1996). The new canals of Amsterdam: An exercise in local electronic democracy. Media, Culture, & Society, 18, 233-247.
6.
Brodie, M., Flournoy, R.E., Altman, D.E., Blendon, R.J., Benson, J.M., & Rosenbaum, M.D. (2000). Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Affairs, 19, 255-265.
7.
Compaine, B.M. ( 2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth?Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8.
Consumer Federation of America. (2000). Disconnected, disadvantaged, and disenfranchised: Explorations in the digital divide. Washington, DC: Cooper, M.N.
9.
Downs, A. ( 1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
10.
Gomez, B.T., Hansford, T.G., & Krause, G.A. ( 2007). The republicans should pray for rain: Weather, turnout, and voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics , 69, 649-663.
11.
Grubesic, T. (n.d.). A spatial taxonomy of broadband regions in the United States. Retrieved from http://telecom.cide.edu/include/internet_conference_2005/TGrubesic_Spatial_Anlysis.ppt Retrieved 4/3/09.
12.
Jackson, L.A., Barbatsis, G., von Eye, A., Biocca, F., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. (2003). Internet use in low-income families: Implications for the digital divide. IT & Society , 1, 141-165. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i05.html Retrieved 4/3/09.
13.
Jennings, M.K., & Zeitner, V. ( 2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis . Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 311-334.
14.
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K., & Miyata, K. ( 2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 582-611.
15.
Lawless, J.L., & Fox, R.L. ( 2001). Political participation of the urban poor. Social Problems, 48, 362-385.
16.
Lee, T.T., & Wei, L. ( 2008). How newspaper readership affects political participation . Newspaper Research Journal, 29, 8-23.
17.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C.J., & Stansbury, M. ( 2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18.
Nie, N.H., & Erbring, L. ( 2002). Internet and society: A preliminary report. IT & Society, 1, 275-283. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01.htmlRetrieved4/3/09.
19.
Polat, R.K. ( 2005). The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication, 20, 435-459.
20.
Riker, W.H., & Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of calculus of voting. The American Political Science Review, 62, 25-42.
21.
Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Kwak, N. ( 2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research , 32, 531-565.
22.
Streck, J.M. ( 1997). Pulling the plug on electronic town meetings: Participatory democracy and the reality of the usenet. New Political Science , 41, 17-46.
23.
Tolbert, C.J., & McNeal, R.S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 175-185.
24.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2006 ). Telecommunications: Broadband deployment is extensive throughout the United States, but it is difficult to assess the extent of deployment gaps in rural areas (GAO Publication No. GAO-06-426). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Verba, S., & Nie, N.H. ( 1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Verba, S., Schlzoman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Weber, L.M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. ( 2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 26-42.
28.
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & DelliCarpini, M.X. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
