Several theorists have entertained the possibility that the egalitarian nature of Internet-based discussion may facilitate meaningful democratic deliberative discussions amongst citizens. This article provides a preliminary empirical test of these claims by examining the extent to which blogs and blogroll communities act as forums for such deliberations. The analysis uses a dataset derived from a content analysis performed on blogs from three Canadian partisan blogrolls in October 2005. We perform three tests of the deliberative qualities of blog-based discussions: (a) whether discussion is characterized by equality of participation; (b) whether bloggers discuss substantive issues; and (c) whether bloggers engage constructively in discussions with political opponents. We find that this online discussion does exhibit some deliberative characteristics but that this discussion is often characterized by inequality of discussion, a focus on non-substantive issues, and unconstructive engagement between bloggers.
Bedell, D. (2000, May 16). Weblogs are alternative voices, offering entry into online world. The San Diego Union-Tribune, p. 8.
2.
Blood, R. (2002). The Weblog handbook: Practical advice on creating and maintaining your blog. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
3.
Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
4.
Carl, C. (2003). Bloggers and their blogs: A depiction of the users and usage of Weblogs on the World Wide Web. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
5.
Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307-326.
6.
Christian, W., & Campbell, C. (1990). Political parties and ideologies in Canada: Liberals, conservatives, socialists, nationalists (3rd ed.) Toronto. Ontario Canada: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
7.
Clarkson, S. (2005). The big red machine: How the Liberal party dominates Canadian politics. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: UBC Press.
8.
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy . In A. Hamlim & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity (pp. 17-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
Davis, R. (1999). The Web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L., & Jacobs, L.R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
11.
Drezner, D.W., & Farrell, F. (2004). The power and politics of blogs. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
12.
Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Heard, A. (2007). Just what is a vote of confidence? The curious case of May 10, 2005. Canadian Journal of Political Science , 40, 395-416.
15.
Helmond, A. (2008). How many blogs are there? Is someone still counting ? The Blog Herald. Retrieved June 3, 2008 from http://www.blogherald.com/2008/02/11/how-many-blogs-are-there-is-someone-still-counting/
16.
Hill, K.A., & Hughes, J.E. (1997). Computer-mediated political communication: The Usenet and political communities. Political Communication , 14, 3-14.
17.
Jansen, H.J., & Koop, R. (2005). Pundits, ideologues and ranters: The British Columbia election online. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30, 613-632.
18.
Katz, R.S., & Crotty, W. (2006). Introduction. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 1-4). London: Sage.
19.
Keren, M. (2004). Blogging and the politics of melancholy. Canadian Journal of Communication, 29, 5-23.
20.
Keren, M. (2006). Blogosphere: The new political arena. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Lexington Books.
21.
Knight, J., & Johnson, J. (1997). What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require? In J. Bohman and W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 279-319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
McKenna, L., & Pole, A. (2004). Do blogs matter? Weblogs in American politics . Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , Chicago.
23.
Meisel, J. (1963). The stalled omnibus: Canadian parties in the 1960s . Social Research, 30, 367-390.
24.
Mills, C.W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
Nayar, P.K. (2004). Virtual world. London: Sage.
26.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Rainie, L. (2005). Data memo: The state of blogging. Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_blogging_data.pdf
28.
Rosenberg, S.W. (2004). Reconstructing the concept of democratic deliberation (CSD Paper 04-02). Irvine: University of California, Center for the Study of Democracy. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-02
29.
Schneider, S.M. (1996). Creating a democratic public sphere through political discussion: A case study of abortion conversation on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 14, 373-393.
30.
Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
31.
Technorati.com. (2008). About us. Retrieved June 3, 2008, from http://www.technorati.com/about/
32.
Trimble, L., & Sampert, S. (2004). Who's in the game? The framing of the Canadian Election 2000 by the national post and the globe and mail. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 37, 51-71.
33.
Tsagarousianou, R. (1999). Electronic democracy: Rhetoric and reality. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 24, 189-208.
34.
Weeks, E.C. (2000). The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials. Public Administration Review , 60, 360-372.
35.
Wilhelm, G. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age: Political life in cyberspace. New York: Routledge .
