This study explores the impact of campaign web sites on electoral civic engagement by examining 2004 Internet Tracking Survey data. Propensity score matching and the recursive bivariate probit model are employed to deal with endogeneity and the missing data problem, which are often ignored in existing literature. Findings show that effects of campaign web sites vary across individual engagements and generally support reinforcement theory rather than mobilization theory.
Angrist, J.D. (1998). Estimating the labor market impact of voluntary military service using social security data on military applicants. Econometrica, 66(2), 249-288.
2.
Arterton, F.C. (1987). Teledemocracy: Can technology protect democracy?Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Baltagi, B.H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
4.
Becker, S.O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358-377.
5.
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67.
6.
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections . New York: Oxford University Press .
8.
Browning, G. (2002). Electronic democracy: Using the Internet to transform American politics (2nd ed.). Medford, NJ: CyberAge.
9.
Corrado, A. (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Prospects and problems . In A. Corrado & C. Firestone (Eds.), Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics (pp. 1-31). Washington, DC : Aspen Institute.
10.
D'Agostino, R.B., Jr. , & Rubin, D.B. (2000). Estimating and using propensity scores with partially missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(451), 749-759.
11.
Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Davis, R. (2005). Politics online: Blogs, chatrooms, and discussion groups in American democracy. New York: Routledge.
13.
Davis, S., Elin, L., & Reeher, G. (2002). Click on democracy: The Internet's power to change political apathy into civic action. Boulder, CO: Westview.
14.
Dehejia, R.H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1053-1062.
15.
Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (2003). The Internet and an informed citizenry. In M. Cornfield & D. M. Anderson (Eds.), The civic web: Online politics and democratic values (pp. 129-153). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W.R., & Robinson, J.P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 307-336.
17.
Foot, K.A., & Schneider, S. (2006). Web campaigning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Greene, W.H. (1998). Gender economics courses in liberal arts colleges: Further results. Journal of Economic Education, 29(4), 291-300.
Grossman, L.K. (1995). The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. New York: Viking Penguin.
21.
Hahn, J. (1998). On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica , 66(2), 315-331.
22.
Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P.E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654.
23.
Jennings, M.K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311-334.
24.
Kamarck, E.C. (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: Business as usual? In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye, Jr. (Eds.), Governance.com: Democracy in the information age (pp. 81-103). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25.
Katz, J.E., & Rice, R.E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Kavanaugh, A.L. (2002). Community networks and civic engagement: A social network approach. Good Society, 11(3), 17-24.
27.
LaLonde, R.J. (1986). Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. American Economic Review , 76(4), 604-620.
28.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. (2003). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
30.
Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Maddala, G.S., & Lee, L.-F. (1976). Recursive models with qualitative endogenous variables. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement , 5(4), 525-545.
32.
Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Morris, D. (1999). Vote.com. Los Angeles: Renaissance.
34.
Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in post-industrial democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Norris, P. (2001). The digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2004 ). November 2004 Tracking Survey. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
Rainie, L., Cornfield, M., & Horrigan, J. (2005). The Internet and campaign 2004. Washington, DC: PEW Internet and American Life Project .
39.
Ramakrishnan, S.K., & Baldassare, M. (2004). The ties that bind: Changing demographics and civic engagement in California. San Francisco : Public Policy Institute of California.
40.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
41.
Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
42.
Robbin, A., Courtright, C., & Davis, L. (2004). ICTs and political life. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 411-481.
43.
Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
44.
Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 516-524.
45.
Scott, J.K. (2006). "E" the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review , 66(3), 341-353.
46.
Selnow, G.W. (1998). Electronic whistle-stops: The impact of the Internet on American politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
47.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it . Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111-132.
49.
Uslaner, E.M. (2000). Social capital and net. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 60-64.
50.
Uslaner, E.M. (2004). Trust, civic engagement, and the Internet. Political Communication, 21(2), 223-242.
51.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Ward, S., Gibson, R., & Nixon, P. (2003). Parties and the Internet: An overview. In R. Gibson, P. Nixon, & S. Ward (Eds.), Political parties and the Internet: Net gain? (pp. 11-38). New York: Routledge.
53.
Weissberg, R. (2005). The limits of civic activism: Cautionary tales on the use of politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
