In an ambient intelligent (AmI) environment with computing capabilities embedded in potentially every object it will be difficult (if not impossible) for users to maintain control over data generation, transfer, and use and to achieve unobservability and anonymity. Obtaining consent might not be feasible for the constant need for collection and exchange of incredible amount of data. In most cases, individuals are not aware that profiling is done, what profiles are being compiled, and what decisions may result from these profiles. Due to the overflow of information users cannot maintain knowledge of all data controllers that have some of their data or exercise their right to correct, rectify, block, or erase information collected about them. The present-day privacy legislation has several weaknesses if confronted with the AmI environment that could lead to the need for new principles on which to base new regulations, to take account of the changed context.
Aarts, E., & Marzano, S. (Eds.). (2003). The new everyday view on ambient intelligence. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: OIO Publishers .
2.
Ahonen, P., Alahuhta, P., Daskala, B., De Hert, P., Delaitre, S., Friedewald, M., et al. (2006). Threats, vulnerabilities and safeguards in ambient intelligence [Project Deliverable D3]. In M. Friedewald, R. Lindner, & D. Wright (Eds.), Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence (SWAMI). Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://swami.jrc.es/pages/documents/swami_d3_3july-final.pdf .
3.
Alahuhta, P., De Hert, P., Delaitre, S., Friedewald, M., Gutwirth, S., Lindner, R., et al. (2005). Dark scenarios in ambient intelligence: Highlighting risks and vulnerabilities [Project Deliverable D2]. In Y. Punie, S. Delaitre , I. Maghiros, & D. Wright (Eds.), Safeguards in a world of ambient intelligence (SWAMI). Retrieved March 22, 2006, from http://swami.jrc.es/pages/documents/swami_d2_scenarios_final_esvf_003.pdf.
4.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. ( 2007). Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data (01248/07/EN, WP 136). Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2007/wp136_en.pdf .
5.
Beresford, A.R., & Stajano, F. (2003). Location privacy in pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(1), 46-55.
6.
Beslay, L., & Hakala, H. (2005). Digital territory: Bubbles. Retrieved August 22, 2006, from http://cybersecurity.jrc.es/docs/digitalterritorybubbles.pdf .
7.
Beslay, L., & Punie, Y. (2002). The virtual residence: Identity, privacy and security (IPTS Report 67: Special Issue on Identity and Privacy). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved August 22, 2006, from http://www.jrc.es/home/report/english/articles/vol67/ipt3e676.htm .
8.
Bohn, J., Coroama, V., Langheinrich, M., Mattern, F., & Rohs, M. (2004). Living in a world of smart everyday objects—Social, economic, and ethical implications. Journal of Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10(5), 763-786.
9.
Bygrave, L.A. (2001). Minding the machine: Article 15 of the EC Data Protection Directive and automated profiling. Computer Law & Security Report, 17, 17-24.
10.
Campbell, R., Al-Muhtadi, J., Naldurg, P., Sampemane, G., & Mickunas, M.D. (2002). Towards security and privacy for pervasive computing. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://gaia.cs.uiuc.edu/papers/towards-percomp-security.pdf.
11.
Cas, J. (2005). Privacy in pervasive computing environments—A contradiction in terms?IEEE Technology and Society Magazine , 24(1), 24-33.
12.
Clarke, R. (1993). Profiling: A hidden challenge to the regulation of data surveillance. Journal of Law and Information Science4(2), 403-419.
13.
Clemens, B., Maghiros, I., Beslay, L., Centeno, C., Punie, Y., Rodríguez, C., et al. (2003). Security and privacy for the citizen in the post-September 11 digital age. A prospective overview. Report to the European Parliament Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Homme Affairs (LIBE) (IPTS Technical Report EUR 20823 EN). Seville, Spain: European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute or Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from fhttp://cybersecurity.jrc.es/docs/libe%20study/libestudy%20eur20823%20.pdf .
14.
Coroama, V., Bohn, J., & Mattern, F. (2004). Living in a smart environment—Implications for the coming ubiquitous Information Society. Retrieved September 11, 2007, from http://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/publ/papers/coroama_lse_implications_2004.pdf .
15.
Cranor, L.F., & Reidenberg, J.R. (2002). Can user agents accurately represent privacy notices? Retrieved March 22, 2006, from http://tprc.org/papers/2002/65/tprc2002-useragents.pdf .
16.
Ducatel, K., Bogdanowicz, M., Scapolo, F., Leijten, J., & Burgelman, J.-C. (Eds.). (2001). ISTAG scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Retrieved May 17, 2006, from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/istagscenarios2010.pdf .
17.
Ellis, R. (2004). The challenges of work/home boundaries and user perceptions for ambient intelligence. In P. Cunningham & M. Cunningham (Eds.), eAdoption and the knowledge economy: Issues, applications, case studies (pp. 1395-1402). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
18.
Emiliani, P., & Stephanidis, C. (2005). Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: Opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBMSystems Journal, 44(3), 605-619.
19.
Eschet, G. (2004). A new challenge to privacy management: Adapting fair information practices to radio frequency identification technology. Retrieved August 10, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=557441 .
20.
European Union. (1995, October 24). Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official JournalL281.
21.
Fischer-Hübner, S., & Andersson, C. (Eds.). (2005). D14.0a — Framework V0. Privacy and Identity Management for Europe (PRIME). Retrieved September 10, 2007, from https://www.prime-project.eu/prime_products/reports/fmwk/pub_del_d14.0.a_ec_wp14.0_v6_final.pdf.
22.
Garfinkel, S. (2001). Database nation. The death of privacy in the 21st century (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: O'Reilly.
23.
Gaudin, J. (1996). The OECD privacy principles—Can they survive technological change? Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/plpr/1996/68.html.
24.
Hildebrandt, M., Gutwirth, S., & De Hert, P. (2005). Implications of profiling practices on democracy and rule of law [Project Deliverable D7.4]. In M. Hildebrandt & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Future of identity in the information society (FIDIS). Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http://www.fidis.net/fileadmin/fidis/deliverables/fidis-wp7-del7.4.implication_profiling_practices.pdf.
25.
Hill, J.L. (2003). System architecture for wireless sensor networks . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California , Berkeley. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.jlhlabs.com/jhill_cs/jhill_thesis.pdf .
26.
Indulska, J., & Sutton, P. (2003). Location management in pervasive systems. In C. Johnson, P. Montague, & C. Steketee (Eds.), Workshop on Wearable, Invisible, Context-Aware, Ambient, Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACSW Frontiers 2003. Retrieved September 11, 2007, from http://crpit.com/confpapers/crpitv21windulska.pdf.
27.
Intille, S.S., & Intille, A.M. (2003). New challenges for privacy law: Wearable computers that create electronic digital diaries. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://web.media.mit.edu/~intille/papers-files/IntilleIntille03.pdf .
28.
Jensen, C.S. (2004). Database aspects of location-based services. In J. Schiller & A. Voisard (Eds.), Location-based services (pp. 115-147). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
29.
Jiang, X., Hong, J.I., & Landay, J.A. (2002). Approximate information flows: Socially-based modeling of privacy in ubiquitous computing. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://guir.berkeley.edu/projects/ubicomp-privacy/pubs/ubicomp2002-aif.pdf .
30.
Langheinrich, M., Coroama, V., Bohn, J., & Mattern, F. (2005). Living in a smart environment—Implications for the coming ubiquitous information society. Telecommunications Review,15(1), 132-143.
31.
Lederer, S. (2003). Designing disclosure: Interactive personal privacy at the dawn of ubiquitous computing. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/research/projects/cs/io/publications/privacy-lederer-msreport-1.01.pdf.
32.
Nippert-Eng, Ch. E. (1995). Home and work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Nixon, P., Wagealla, W., English, C., & Terzis, S. (2004). Security, privacy and trust issues in smart environments . Retrieved September 11, 2006, from http://smartlab.cis.strath.ac.uk/publications/techreports/sptpaperfinal.pdf .
34.
Patijn, Al. (2004, October 14-15). Enforcement of the rights of data subjects. Paper presented at the Conference on the Rights and Responsibilities of Data Subjects, Prague, Czech Republic. Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/data_protection/events/conferences/dp%20_2004_%20report%20patijn.pdf.
35.
Punie, Y. (2003). A social and technological view on ambient intelligence in everyday life: What bends the trend? (Report to the European Media, Technology and Everyday Life Research Network). Retrieved August 22, 2006 , from www.lse.ac.uk/collections/emtel/reports/punie_2003_emtel.pdf .
36.
Riva, G. (2004). The psychology of ambient intelligence: Activity, situation and presence. In G. Riva, F. Davide, F. Vatalaro, & M. Alcañiz (Eds.), Ambient intelligence: The evolution of technology, communication and cognition towards the future of the human-computer interaction (pp. 19—34). Amsterdam: IOS Press. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.emergingcommunication.com/volume6.html .
37.
Schreurs, W., Hildebrandt, M., Gasson, M., & Warwick, K. (Eds.). (2005). Report on actual and possible profiling techniques in the field of ambient intelligence [Project Deliverable D7.3]. Future of identity in the information society (FIDIS) [Project Deliverable D7]. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.fidis.net/fileadmin/fidis/deliverables/fidis-wp7-del7.3.ami_profiling.pdf.
38.
Siegele, L. (2002). How about now? A survey of the real-time economy . Economist, 362(8257), 3-18.
39.
Soppera, S., & Burbridge, T. (2004). Maintaining privacy in pervasive computing—Enabling acceptance of sensor-based services. BT Technology Journal,22(3), 106-118.
40.
Spiekermann, S. (2005). Perceived control: Scales for privacy in ubiquitous computing. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.internetoekonomie.net/news_uploads/20050711-085609_25_um05_spiekermann_final2.pdf .
41.
Weber, W. (2003). Ambient intelligence—Industrial research on a visionary concept. Retrieved August 25, 2006, from http://www.sigda.org/archives/proceedingarchives/compendiums/papers/2003/islped03/pdffiles/keynote2.pdf .
42.
Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data. (1997). Anonymity on the Internet (Recommendation 3/97). Retrieved June 20, 2005 , from http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/1997/wp6_en.pdf .
