Telework has been the subject of study for longer than a quarter century, yet its causes and consequences are poorly understood. A key reason for this shortcoming is that scholars define and use the concept in many different ways. This article presents a taxonomy of telework, distinguishing among three distinct forms: fixed-site telework, mobile telework, and flexiwork. It then offers a series of research questions about the associations among these three types of telework and a variety of other factors. Using data collected in a national telephone survey of more than 1,200 U.S. computer-using workers, the authors empirically demonstrate that the three types of teleworkers are unique along key dimensions regarding their individual characteristics, organizational and technological contexts, and the impacts on their work.
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383-400.
2.
Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34-49.
3.
Bèlanger, F. (1999). Workers’ propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Information & Management, 35(3), 139-153.
4.
Bussing, A. (1998). Teleworking and quality of life. In P. J. Jackson & J. M. Van der Wielen (Eds.), Teleworking: International perspectives (pp. 144-165). New York: Routledge.
5.
Davis, D. D., & Polonko, K. A. (2001). Telework America 2001 summary [Press release]. Scottsdale, AZ: ITAC.
6.
Davis, D. D., & Polonko, K. A. (2003, April). Distributed work in the virtual office: A national study of tele-work and work outcomes. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
7.
Dimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: Supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work & Employment, 18(3), 181-194.
8.
Duxbury, L., & Neufeld, D. (1999). An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16(1), 1-28.
9.
Ellison, N. B. (1999). Social impacts: New perspectives on telework. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 338-356.
10.
Fritz, M. E. W., Higa, K., & Narasimhan, S. (1995). Toward a telework taxonomy and test for suitability: A synthesis of the literature. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 311-334.
11.
Gareis, K. (2002). The intensity of telework in 2002 in the EU, Switzerland and the USA. Bonn, Germany: Empirica GmbH.
12.
Haddon, L., & Brynin, M. (2005). The character of telework and the characteristics of teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 34-46.
13.
Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., & Miller, B. C. (1996). Work and family in the virtual office: Perceived influences of mobile telework. Family Relations, 45, 293-301.
14.
JALA International. (n.d.). JALA International: Telework definitions. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.jala.com/definitions.php
15.
Kraut, R. E. (1989). Telecommuting: The trade-offs of home work. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 19-47.
16.
Kurland, N. B., & Bailey, D. E. (1999). Telework: The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53-53.
17.
Lindstrom, J., Moberg, A., & Rapp, B. (1997). On the classification of telework. European Journal of Information Systems, 6, 243-255.
18.
Mokhtarian, P. L. (1991). Defining telecommuting. Transportation Research Record, 1305, 273-281.
19.
Mokhtarian, P. L., Salomon, I., & Choo, S. (2005). Measuring the measurable: Why can’t we agree on the number of telecommuters in the U.S.?Quality and Quantity, 39, 423-452.
20.
Nilles, J. M. (1975). Telecommunications and organizational decentralization. IEEE Transactions On Communications, 23, 1142-1147.
21.
Olson, M. H., & Primps, S. B. (1990). Working at home with computers. In M. D. Ermann, M. B. Williams, & C. Gutièrrez Carranza (Eds.), Computers, ethics, and society (pp. 189-201). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Peters, P., Tijdens, K. G., & Wetzels, C. (2004). Employees’ opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption. Information & Management, 41, 469-482.
23.
Pinsonneault, A., & Boisvert, M. (2001). The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: A review of the literature. In N. J. Johnson (Ed.), Telecommuting and virtual offices: Issues & opportunities (pp. 163-185). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
24.
Qvortrup, L. (1998). From teleworking to networking. In P. J. Jackson & J. M. Van der Wielen (Eds.), Teleworking: International perspectives (pp. 21-39). New York: Routledge.
25.
Salaff, J. W. (2002). Where home is the office. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 464-495). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
26.
Smith, R. L., Jr. (2005). Annual survey shows Americans are working from many different locations outside their employer’s office [Press release]. Silver Spring, MD: ITAC.
27.
Stanworth, C. (1998). Telework and the information age. New Technology, Work and Employment, 13(1), 51-62.
28.
Steward, B. (2000). Changing times: The meaning, measurement and use of time in teleworking. Time & Society, 9(1), 57-74.
29.
Sullivan, C. (2003). What’s in a name? Definitions and conceptualisations of teleworking and homeworking. New Technology, Work & Employment, 18(3), 158-165.
30.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Work at home in 2004 (Press release USDL 05-1768). Washington, DC: Author.
31.
Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. P. (1992). An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science, 38, 1687-1706.
32.
Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 213-238.
