Academic computing in Asia is marked by a process of uneven development with the National University of Singapore clearly on the leading edge. This article provides a short overview of the use of information technology in Asian academic institutions and then a case study of its use at the National University of Singapore with a particular emphasis given to computer-mediated discussions.
Asiaweek.com. (2000). Asia’s best universities 2000. Available at: www.asiaweek.com/asiaweek/features/universities2000/schools/multi.overall.html
2.
Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slowmotion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54 (2), 198-217.
3.
Boylan, M. (2004). What have we learned from 15 years of supporting the development of innovative teaching technology?Social Science Computer Review, 22 (4), 405-425.
4.
Briner, Martin (1999). Contstructivism. Available at http://curriculum.calstatela.edu/faculty/psparks/theorists/501const.htm
5.
Gil, A., & Quinones, A. (1999, October). Listserv: A tool for instruction in higher education classrooms. Paper presented at the International Council for Innovations in Higher Education, Puerto Rico.
6.
Gordon, I., & O’Grady, G. (2002). Transferring learning responsibilities to students and computer mediated discussion forums. In C. M. Wang (Ed.), TLHE Symposium 2002: Second Symposium on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 370-375). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning. Longer version available at: http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/hisilg/Transferring%20learning.pdf
7.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1998, August). Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
8.
Johanyak, M. F. (1997). Analyzing the amalgamated electronic text: Bringing cognitive, social, and contextual factors of individual language users. Computers and Composition, 14 (1), 91-110.
9.
Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (1999, October). Learning environments for studying argumentation: Learning effects of e-mail and face-to-face study. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Technology and Education, Tampa, FL.
10.
Minch, K. M. (1995, November). Redefining “communication” for the basic course student: Helping undergraduates to conceive of computer messages as communication. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
11.
Olaniran, B. A. (1996). Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Communication Education, 45 (3), 244-259.
12.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
13.
Schutte, H., & Ciarlante, D. (1998). Consumer behavior in Asia. New York: New York University Press.
14.
Scovell, P. (1991, April). Differences between computer and non computer mediated communication: Apreliminary experimental study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
15.
Svinicki, M. D. (1999, Winter). Newdirections in learning and motivation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (80), 5-27.
16.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
