Many online surveys offer the chance to win prizes as a primary incentive for respondents. One researcher found that prepaid monetary incentives were the most effective technique for increasing response rates, however, other researchers showed that a prize incentive outperformed other incentive types in a web-based survey. Using the immediacy effect and supporting theories as a base, this study extends the research on using prize draws as an effective incentive for web surveys by investigating the effects of immediate versus delayed notification for prize draw winners. Results indicate that the immediate notification of prize draw results did significantly increase response rates to the survey over the delayed notification, receipt of results, and control groups.
Birnbaum, M.
(2001). A web-based program of research on decision making. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 23-55). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
2.
Bosnjak, M., & Tuten, T. L. (2001). Classifying response behaviors in web-based surveys. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Retrieved October 9, 2002, from www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/boznjak.html
3.
Bosnjak, M.
, & Tuten, T. L. (2003). Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys—An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 208-217.
4.
Brennan, M., Rae, N.,& Parackal, M. (1999). Survey-based experimental research via the Web: Some observations. Marketing Bulletin, 10, 83-92. Retrieved October 9, 2002, from http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/article10/article9.asp
5.
Church, A. H.
(1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62-79.
6.
Cook, C.
, Heath, F.,& Thompson, R. L. (2000). Ameta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821-836.
7.
Diamond, W.
, & Johnson, R. (1990). The framing of sales promotions: An approach to classification. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 494-500.
8.
Dillman, D. A.
(1999). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Frederick, S.
, Loewenstein, G.,& O’Donoghue, T. (2003). Time discounting and time preference: Acritical review. In G. Loewenstein, D. Read,& R. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (pp. 13-86). New York: Russell Sage.
10.
Frick, A.
, Bächtiger, M.-T., & Reips, U.-D. (2001). Financial incentives, personal information, and drop out in online studies. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 209-219). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
11.
Hackler, J. C.
, & Bourgette, P. (1973 Summer). Dollars, dissonance, and survey returns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 266-281.
12.
Herrnstein, R. J.
(1990). Rational choice theory: Necessary but not sufficient. American Psychologist, 45, 356-367.
13.
Herrnstein, R. J.
, Loewenstein, G. F., Prelec, D., & Vaughan, W., Jr. (1993). Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice. Journal of Behavior Decision Making, 6, 149-185.
14.
Herrnstein, R. J.
, & Prelec, D. (1991). Melioration: A theory of distributed choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 137-156.
15.
Loewenstein, G.
(1987). Anticipation and valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 667-684.
16.
Loewenstein, G. F.
(1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science, 34, 2.
17.
Lozar Manfreda, K. (2001). Web survey errors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ljubljana (Slovenia), Faculty of Social Sciences.
18.
MacElroy, B. (2000). Variables influencing dropout rates in web-based surveys. Quirk’s Marketing Research Review. Retrieved October 9, 2002, from www.quirks.com/articles/article.asp?arg_ArticleID=605
19.
Paolillo, J. G. P.
,& Lorenzi, P. (1984). Monetary incentives and mail questionnaire response rates. Journal of Advertising, 13, 46-48.
20.
Prelec, D.
, & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37(7), 770-786.
21.
Read, D.
, Loewenstein, G., & Kalyanaraman, S. (1999). Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 257-273.
22.
Rothschild, M.
,& Gaidis, W. (1981, Spring). Behavioral learning theory: Its relevance to marketing and promotions. Journal of Marketing, 45, 70-78.
23.
Samuelson, P.
(1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155-161.
24.
Stigler, G. J.
(1965). The development of utility theory. In Essays in the history of economics (chap. 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
