This research note offers cautionary evidence, indicating just how little we know about how respondents react to and complete Web surveys. Researchers using or contemplating a Web-based approach need to be very clear that the line between the phenomena to be measured and the means of measurement is often quite fuzzy. This note uses data from Survey2001 to illustrate this point. Nearly 30,000 respondents completed part or all of Survey2001, which was hosted by the National Geographic Magazine’s Web site and queried individuals on a number of topics related to the impact of information technology on conservation, community and culture.
Caplan, P.
, Crawford, M., Hyde, J., & Richardson, J. (1997). Gender differences in human cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Couper, M. P.
, Traugott, M. W., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230-253.
3.
Czech, B.
,& Krausman, P. (1999). Public opinion on endangered species conservation and policy. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 469-479.
4.
Dancer, D.
(1996). Over-glossied and imaged-out. Wild Earth, (Spring), 81-87.
5.
DeLeeuw, E. D.
(2001). Reducing missing data in surveys: An overview of methods. Quality and Quantity, 35(2), 147-160.
6.
Devine, R. (1996). The little things that run the world. Sierra, (July/August). Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.sierraclub.org/sierra/199607/little.asp
7.
Dillman, D. A.
, Caldwell, S.,& Gansemer, M. (2000). Visual design effects on item nonresponse to a question about work satisfaction that precedes the Q-12 agree-disagree items. Gallup Research Report, 1-10.
8.
Dillman, D.
, Tortora, R.,& Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for constructing web surveys (SESRC Technical Report). Available at http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers.htm
9.
Dillman, D. A.
, Tortora, R. D., Conradt, J., & Bowker, D. (1998, August). Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates for web surveys. Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas, Texas. Available at http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers.htm
10.
Halpern, D.
(2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Kellert, S.
(1993). Attitudes, knowledge and behavior toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 53-70.
12.
Kellert, S.
(1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
13.
Kellert, S.
, & Berry, J. (1987). Attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15, 363-371.
14.
Kempton, W.
, Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Redline, C. D.
, & Dillman, D. A. (1999, October). The influence of auxiliary, symbolic, numeric, and verbal languages on navigational compliance in self-administered questionnaires. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Nonresponse, Portland, OR. Available at http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers.htm
16.
Sanchez, M. E.
(1992). Effect of questionnaire design on the quality of survey data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 20617.
