The status of technological and scientific skill attainment by American Indian individuals and the science- and technology-related issues faced by Indian communities and cultures are outlined. The potential for unique Indian contributions to science as well as the potential for scientific contributions to Indian well-being are described. Factors that have contributed to science/technology problems and impeded science/technology successes among Indians are reviewed. Some recent Indian science/technology projects that provide model examples of what can work are reviewed.
Adler, P. S., & Shenbar, A. (1990). Adapting your technological base: The organizational challenge. Sloan Management Review, 30, 25-37.
2.
Atleo, C. (in press). Land, science, and indigenous science: Tales from a modern treaty negotiation process. In K. James (Ed.), Turning science and technology to the service of American Indian communities. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
3.
Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: Trend and causes. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
4.
Boloz, S. A., & Varrati, R. (1987). Apologize or analyze: Measuring academic achievement in the reservation school. Journal of American Indian Education, 23, 23-28.
5.
Brandt, E. A. (1992). The Navajo area student dropout study: Findings and implications. Journal of American Indian Education, 32, 48-65.
6.
Brescia, W., & Fortune, J. C. (1989). Standardized testing of American Indian students. College Student Journal, 23, 98-104.
7.
Bureau of Primary Health Care. (1998). Breast cancer awareness. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
8.
Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. (1990). America’s choice: High skills or low wages. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
9.
Dukepoo, F. (in press). The Native American honor society: Challenging Indian students to achieve in science. In K. James (Ed.), Turning science and technology to the service of American Indian communities. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10.
Englelhoff, W. G. (1991). Information processing theory and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 341-368.
11.
Fay, K. L. (1976). Developing Indian employment opportunities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs.
12.
Gonzalez, J. T. (1988). Dilemmas of the high-achieving Chicana: The double-bind factor in male/female relationships. Sex Roles, 18, 367-380.
13.
Indian Nations at Risk Task Force. (1991). Indian nations at risk: An educational strategy for action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. (1994). Balancing the scales of opportunity: Ensuring racial and ethnic diversity in the health professions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
James, K. (1993). The social context of organizational justice: Cultural, intergroup and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 21-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
James, K. (in press-a). Fires need fuel: Merging science training and practice with Indian community needs. In K. James (Ed.), Turning science and technology to the service of American Indian communities. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
James, K. (in press-b). There are doorways in these huts: Characteristics and effectiveness of programs for Native Canadian Students at colleges and universities in British Columbia and Ontario. Journal of American Indian Education.
18.
James, K., Chavez, E., Beauvais, F., Edwards, R., & Oetting, G. (1995). School achievement and dropout among Anglo and Indian females and males. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 19, 181-206.
19.
James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211-226.
20.
James, K., & Khoo, G. (1991). Ethnic identity and minority workers in primarily non-minority organizations. Hispanic Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 13, 169-192.
21.
James, K., Khoo, G., & Harbold, D. (1996). Minority women and technology. Technology Studies, 3, 94-120.
22.
James, K., Wolf, W., Lovato, C., Byers, S. (1995). Barriers to workplace advancement experienced by Native Americans. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Glass Ceiling Commission.
23.
Jamison, R. (in press). Innovative financial strategies for promoting development in Indian communities. In K. James (Ed.), Turning science and technology to the service of American Indian communities. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
24.
Johnson, T. (1993, December 22). Employment rises dramatically on reservations having casinos. Indian Country Today, 13, pp. 1, 2.
25.
Jussim, L. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review, 93, 429-445.
26.
Lauver, P. J., & Jones, R. M. (1991). Factors associated with perceived career options in American Indian, White, and Hispanic rural high school students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 159-166.
27.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67-101). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Lutfig, R. L. (1983). Effects of schooling on the self-concept of Native American students. School Counselor, 30, 251-260.
29.
Marcus, A., & Segal, H. (1989). Technology in America: A brief history. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
30.
Martinez-Maldonado, M. (1991). Hypertension in Hispanics, Asians and Pacific Islanders, and Native Americans. Circulation, 83, 1467-1469.
31.
Mishra, S. P. (1981). Relationship of WISC-R factor scores to academic achievement and classroom behaviors of Native American Navajos. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 14, 26-30.
32.
Morrissette, P. J. (1994). The holocaust of First Nations people: Residual effects on parenting and treatment implications. Contemporary Family Therapy, 16, 381-392.
33.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999). Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
34.
Neimeier, D. (1996). Commentary on “minority women and technology.”Technology Studies, 3, 126-129.
35.
Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 195-230). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
36.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Telecommunications technology and Native Americans: Opportunities and challenges (OTA-ITC-621). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
Office of Technology Policy. (1999). The digital work force: Building infotech skills at the speed of innovation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
38.
Panel on Technology and Employment. (1987). Technology and employment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39.
Pelz, D. C. (1956). Some social factors related to performance in a research organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 310-325.
40.
Poodry, C. (in press). What Indian communities need from science and how to get it. In K. James (Ed.), Turning science to the service of American Indian communities. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
41.
Quality Education for Minorities Project. (1990). Education that works: An action plan for the education of minorities. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
42.
Reyhner, J. A. (1992). American Indian cultures and school success. Journal of American Indian Education, 32, 30-39.
43.
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. (1996). Gathering Strength. People to people, nation to nation: The report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: Vol. 3. Ottawa, Canada: Ministry of Supply and Services.
44.
Sanders, D. (1987). Cultural conflicts: An important factor in the academic failure of American Indian students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 15, 81-90.
45.
Schneider, J. M. (1984). Review of research on minority performance in education and training programs (Report No. N00014-80-C-0438). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, U.S. Department of the Navy.
46.
Sells, L. (1982). Leverage for equal opportunity through mastery of mathematics. In S. M. Humphries (Ed.), Women and minorities in science (pp. 7-26). Boulder, CO: Westview.
47.
Sherman, J. (1982). Mathematics the critical filter: A look at some residues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 428-444.
48.
Smith, D. H. (1994). The issue of compatibility between cultural integrity and economic development among Native American tribes. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 18, 177-205.
49.
Steele, C. M. (1990, August). Protecting the self: Implications for social psychological theory and minority achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
50.
William, E., Radin, N., & Coggins, K. (1996). Parental involvement in childrearing and the school performance of Ojibwa children: An exploratory study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 578-595.
51.
Young, T. K. (1994). The health of Native Americans: Toward a biocultural epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
