As science educators, we must view the changing nature of society brought on by technology and the global nature of society as an impetus to reexamine the nature of science instruction. We have been bestowed with the responsibility to educate students on a variety of topics that less than two decades ago did not exist. Many of these social issues are controversial in nature and are directly linked to the local, regional, national, and global communities in which we exist. However, including these social issues in the extant curriculum of science has, at best, been limited. This is true even though the National Science Education Standards specifically indicate that science and technology, as well as science in personal and social perspectives, are integral to science education. The following study examines a group of science teachers’ beliefs about the implementation of controversial social/technological issues in the extant science curriculum. Indications are that teachers believe that social issues are important to study, yet lack the support from their communities to teach social issues.
Aikenhead, G. (1990). Consequences to learning science through STS: A research perspective. Paper presented to the British Council’s “Science, Technology and Society Education” course, Department of Education Studies, Oxford University.
2.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision-making: Implications for teaching science. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 5(2), 117-129.
3.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 607-630.
4.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1989). Views on science-technology-society, form CDN.mc5—Canadian standard responses. Sakatoon, Saskatchewan: Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Saskatchewan.
5.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans(Publication No. 89-01S). Washington, DC: Author.
6.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Benson, G. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 329-344.
8.
Borphy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1981). Students’ characteristics and teaching. New York: Longman.
9.
Bragaw, D. (1993). Society, technology, and science: Is there room for another imperative?Theory Into Practice: Science, Technology, Society: Opportunities, 31(1), 4-11.
10.
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives(pp. 21-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Bybee, R. W. (1987). Science education and the science-technology-society (S-T-S) theme. Science Education, 71, 667-683.
12.
Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal reflections. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Bybee, R. W., & Mau, T. (1986). Science technology related global problems: An international survey of science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 599-618.
14.
Gilliom, M. E., Helgeson, S. L., & Zuga, K. F. (1992). The issue. Theory Into Practice: Science, Technology, Society: Opportunities, 31(1), 1-3.
15.
Harms, N. C., & Yager, R. E. (1981). What research says to the science teacher. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
16.
Hofstein, A., & Yager, R. E. (1982). Societal issues as organizers for the science education in the 80’s. School Science and Mathematics, 82, 539-547.
17.
Jackson, D. (1993). Two cases of implementing STS activities in the context of a traditional middle school life science curriculum: Same rules, different games. Paper presented at the annual National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
18.
Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 143-166.
19.
McGinn, M. K., Roth, W. M., Boutonne, S., & Woszczyna, C. (1995). The transformation of individual and collective knowledge in elementary science classrooms that are organized as knowledge-building communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Researchers in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
20.
McGinnis, R. J. (1993). STS from a taboo and Noa perspective.Paper presented at the annual National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
21.
Mitchener, C. P., & Anderson, R. D. (1989). Teachers’ perspective:Developing and implementing an STS curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(3), 351-369.
22.
National and State Department of Education. (1996). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 1996 mathematics report card for the nation and the states: Center for education statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
23.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24.
National Science Teachers Association. (1998). NSTA/NCATE standards for science teacher preparation[Online]. Available: http://homepages.ius.edu/LZ/SGILBE01/web_docs/%20nsta98.htm
25.
O’Loughlin, M. (1990, April). Evolving beliefs about teaching and learning: The view from Hofstra University: A perspective on teachers’ beliefs and their effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
26.
Pedersen, J. E. (1992). The effects of cooperative controversies, presented as STS issues, on anxiety and achievement in secondary science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 92(7), 374-380.
27.
Pedersen, J. E., & Totten, S. (1994). Students’ sources of information and social issues, their level of participation in social action, schools’ preparation of students to address social issues, and students’ personal concerns relating to social issues: A national survey of high school students. Paper presented at the annual National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.
28.
Penick, J. E., & Yager, R. E. (1986). Science education: New concerns and issues. Science Education, 70, 427-431.
29.
Rachlin, J. (1988, December). Finding the right formula: Innovative cures for the sad state of science education. U.S. News & World Report, pp. 59-61.
30.
Roy, R. (1985). The science/technology/society connection. Curriculum Review, 24(3), 12-14.
31.
Rubba, P. A., & Wiesenmayer, R. L. (1985). A goal structure for pre-college STS education: A proposal based upon recent literature in environmental education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 5(6), 573-580.
32.
Ryan, A. G. (1987). High school graduates’ beliefs about S-T-S: The characteristics of scientists. Science Education, 71, 489-510.
33.
Simmons, P. (1993). Science/technology/society: Multiple research perspectives. Paper presented at the annual National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
34.
Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois.
35.
Tobin, K. (1991). Making sense of science teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI.
36.
Tobin, K. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching(45-93). New York: Macmillan.
37.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Hook, K. (1992). The construction and reconstruction of teacher knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
38.
Totten, S. (1992). Educating for the development of social consciousness and social responsibility. In Social issues in the English classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
39.
Totten, S., & Pedersen, J. E. (1994). The status of the study of social issues in the high school social studies classroom: A study. Inquiry in Social Studies, 32(1), 22-46.
40.
Toulmin, S. (1979). Can science and ethics be reconnected. Hastings Center Report, 28-34.
41.
Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 557-558.
42.
Yager, R. E. (1988). A new focus for school science: S/T/S. School Science and Mathematics, 88, 181-189.
43.
Yore, L. D., & Denning, D. (1989, March/April). Implementing change in secondary science reading and textbook usage: A desired image, a current profile and a plan for change. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
44.
Zoller, U., Donn, S., Wild, R., & Beckett, P. (1991). Teachers’ beliefs and views on selected science-technology-society topics: A probe into STS literacy versus indoctrination. Science Education, 75(5), 541-561.
45.
Zoller, U., Dunn, S., Wild, R., & Beckett, P. (1991). Students’ versus their teachers’ beliefs and positions on science/technology/ society oriented issues. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 25-35.
