de Bono. E. (1968). New think: The use of lateral thinking in the generation of new ideas. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Holsti, O.R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). (2nd ed.) (pp. 596-692). Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
3.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
4.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Mitchell, E.S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A method for nursing science . Advances in Nursing Science, 8 (3), 18-26.
6.
Nalimov, V.V. (1982). Realms of the unconscious: The enchantedfrontier . Philadelphia: ISI Press.
7.
Nickles, T. (1987). 'Twixt method and madness. In N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), The process of science: Contemporary philosophical approaches to understanding scientific practice (pp. 41-67). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Powers, B.A. (1987). Taking sides: A response to Goodwin and Goodwin . Nursing Research, 36 (2), 122-126.
10.
Rogers, M.E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing . Philadelphia: Davis.
11.
Rogers, M.E. (1987). Rogers's science of unitary human beings. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and critiques (pp. 139-146). Philadelphia : Saunders.
12.
Whall, A.L. (1987). A critique of Rogers's framework. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and critiques (pp. 147-158). Philadelphia : Saunders.
13.
Wilson, H.S. (1987). Introducing research in nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
