In this article, I explore the turn to mixed methods in nursing. I examine the alignment of key characteristics (philosophical underpinnings and the concept of integration) of mixed methods with nursing’s disciplinary perspective and its links with theory. I also provide a brief overview of the history and current status of mixed methods and conclude by looking to the future to suggest an additional twist in the turn to mixed methods for nursing science.
AkerbladL.Seppanen-JarvelaR.HaapakoskK. (2020). Integrative strategies in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. [Advance online publication]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125
2.
BazeleyP. (2017). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.
3.
BazeleyP. (2018). ‘Mixed methods in my bones’: Transcending the qualitative-quantitative divide. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 334-341.
4.
BeckC. T.HarrisonL. (2016). Mixed-methods research in the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 39(2), 224-234.
5.
CampbellD.FiskeD.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297-312.
6.
ChatterjeeA. (2011). Ontology, epistemology, and multimethod research in political science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43(1), 73-99.
7.
CoatesA. (2020). The prevalence of philosophical assumptions described in mixed methods research in education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820958210
8.
CreswellJ. W. (1995). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2018). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In Hesse-BiberS. N.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 1-24). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
11.
DenzinN. K. (Ed.). (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
EckhardtA. L.DeVonH. A. (2017). The MIXED framework: A novel approach to evaluating mixed-methods rigor. Nursing Inquiry, 24(4), Article e12189. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12189
13.
FawcettJ. (2015). Invisible nursing research: Thoughts about mixed methods research and nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 28(2), 167-168.
14.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6-part2), 2134-2156.
15.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291-307.
16.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2019). Rebuttal—Conceptualizing integration during both the data collection and data interpretation phases: A response to David Morgan. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 12-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/155868981878596a
17.
FitzpatrickJ. J.ReedP. G.SmithM. C.SmithM. J.RoyC. (2019). Guest Editorial: The nursing disciplinary perspective – 50 years ago and the view forward. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(1), 2.
18.
FlorczakK. L. (2014). Purists need not apply: The case for pragmatism in mixed methods research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27(4), 278-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318414546419
GiddingsL. S.GrantB. M. (2007). A Trojan horse for positivism? A critique of mixed methods research. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), 52-60.
21.
IrvineF. E.ClarkM. T.EfstathiouN.HerberO. R.HowroydF.GratrixLSammutD.TrummA.HanssenT. A.TaylorJ.Bradbury-JonesC. (2020). The state of mixed methods research in nursing: A focused mapping review and synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76, 2798-2809.
22.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225.
MolA. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
25.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ.SarkarS.BurkholderG.VarjasK.JayasenaA. (2007). Mixed methods in intervention research: Theory to adaptation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 164-182.
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2012). Putting the MIXED back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving toward the radical middle. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(3), 192-219.
27.
ReedP. G. (2018). A philosophy of nursing science and practice: Intermodernism. In ReedP. G.ShearerN. B. C. (Eds.), Nursing knowledge and theory innovation: Advancing the science of practice (2nd ed., pp. 21-46). Springer.
28.
ReedP. G. (2019). Intermodernism: A philosophical perspective for development of scientific nursing theory. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(1), 17-27.
29.
SandelowskiM. (2011). When a cigar is not just a cigar: Alternative takes on data and data analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 34, 342-352.
30.
SandelowskiM. (2014). Unmixing mixed methods research. Research in Nursing & Health, 37, 3-8.
31.
SchoonenboomJ. (2019). A performative paradigm for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 284-300.
32.
Shannon-BakerP. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334.
33.
ShimM.JohnsonB.BradtJ.GassonS. (2021). A mixed methods–grounded theory design for producing more refined theoretical models. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 61-86.
34.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 207-211.
35.
TashakkoriA.TedlieC. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
36.
UprichardE.DawneyL. (2019). Data diffraction: Challenging data integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 19-32.
37.
YounasA.PedersonM.Laoagan TayabenJ. (2019). Review of mixed-methods research in nursing. Nursing Research, 68(6), 464-472.
