This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of nursing that was based on the interactive attainment model in alleviating anxiety and pain during colonoscopy. This retrospective study included 213 patients, divided into intervention and control groups. Both groups underwent normal or painless colonoscopy. Anxiety and pain were evaluated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively. The intervention group reported significantly lower anxiety and VAS pain scores compared with the control group. The interactive attainment model of nursing effectively reduces patient anxiety and pain and lowers complication rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
AllenP.ShawE.JongA.BehrensH.SkinnerI. (2015). Severity and duration of pain after colonoscopy and gastroscopy: A cohort study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(13-14), 1895–1903. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12817
2.
CaiW.ZhangX.LuoY.YeM.GuoY.RuanW. (2022). Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: A qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1064. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08466-5
3.
ClarkeJ. L.BournS.SkoufalosA.BeckE. H.CastilloD. J. (2017). An innovative approach to health care delivery for patients with chronic conditions. Population Health Management, 20(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2016.0076
4.
EsmeM.TopeliA.YavuzB. B.AkovaM. (2019). Infections in the elderly critically-ill patients. Frontiers in Medicine, 6, 118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00118
5.
GabelP.LarsenM. B.EdwardsA.KirkegaardP.AndersenB. (2020). Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One, 15(11), e0241703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241703
6.
HassingerJ. P.HolubarS. D.PendlimariR.DozoisE. J.LarsonD. W.CimaR. R. (2010). Effectiveness of a multimedia-based educational intervention for improving colon cancer literacy in screening colonoscopy patients. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 53(9), 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e291c0
7.
JanikM.HeitschmidtM.GasconM.RobertsonL. (2023). An educational intervention to improve patient outcomes for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology Nursing, 46(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000716
JonesR. M.DeversK. J.KuzelA. J.WoolfS. H. (2010). Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: A mixed-methods analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(5), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.021
10.
KoF. C. (2019). Preoperative frailty evaluation: A promising risk-stratification tool in older adults undergoing general surgery. Clinical Therapeutics, 41(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.014
11.
LaiE. J.CalderwoodA. H.DorosG.FixO. K.JacobsonB. C. (2009). The Boston bowel preparation scale: A valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 69(3), 620–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057
12.
LangleyG. B.SheppeardH. (1985). The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement. Rheumatology International, 5(4), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541514
13.
LiuA.WangH.LinY.FuL.LiuY.YanS.ChenH. (2020). Gastrointestinal endoscopy nurse assistance during colonoscopy and polyp detection: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Medicine, 99(34), e21278. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021278
14.
LiuA.YanS.WangH.LinY.WuJ.FuL.WuQ.LuY.LiuY.ChenH. (2020). Ward nurses-focused educational intervention improves the quality of bowel preparation in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial. Medicine, 99(36), e20976. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020976
15.
MacGillivrayT. E. (2020). Advancing the culture of patient safety and quality improvement. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 16(3), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-16-3-192
16.
Molina-MulaJ.Gallo-EstradaJ. (2020). Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030835
O’DanielM.RosensteinA. H. (2008). Professional communication and team collaboration. In HughesR. G. (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (pp. 271–284). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
19.
RestallG.WalkerJ. R.WaldmanC.ZawalyK.MichaudV.MoffatD.SinghH. (2018). Perspectives of primary care providers and endoscopists about current practices, facilitators and barriers for preparation and follow-up of colonoscopy procedures: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 782. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3567-y
TobiasJ. D.LederM. (2011). Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, 5(4), 395410. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.87270
22.
TrevisaniL.ZelanteA.SartoriS. (2014). Colonoscopy, pain and fears: Is it an indissoluble trinomial?World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 6(7), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i7.227
23.
YangC.SriranjanV.Abou-SettaA. M.PoluhaW.EnnsR. (2018). Anxiety associated with colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy: A systematic review. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 113(12), 1810–1818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0226-2
