In this column, the author provides a clear explanation of the nature of meta-analysis, systematic reviews, integrative reviews, meta-synthesis, and metasummary along with a discussion of the paradigms that support each. Also the appropriateness of these methods of synthesis and a recommendation as to their use is discussed in terms of the utility of research.
Bettany-DaltikovJ. (2010a). Learning how to undertake a systematic review: part 1. Nursing Standard, 24(50), 47-55.
2.
Bettany-DaltikovJ. (2010b). Learning how to undertake a systematic review: part 2. Nursing Standard, 24(51), 47-56.
3.
BurnsN.GroveS. K. (2009). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. St. Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier.
4.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
5.
Dixon-WoodsM.SuttonA.ShawR.MillerT.SmithJ.YoungB.BonasSBoothA.JonesD. (2007). Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 12(1), 42-47.
6.
EggerM.SmithG. D. (1997). Meta-analysis potentials and promise. British Medical Journal, 315(22), 1371-1374.
7.
EggerM.SmithG. D.PhillipsA. N. (1997). Meta-analysis principles and procedures. British Medical Journal, 315(6), 1533-1537.
8.
KirkevoldM. (1997). Integrative nursing research−an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 977-984.
9.
MelnykB. M.Fineout-OverholtE. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
10.
NichollsD. (2009). Qualitative research: Part two – methodologies. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(11), 586-592.
11.
NieswiadomyR. M. (2008). Foundations of nursing research (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
12.
ParseR. R. (1999). Hope. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
13.
ParseR. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
14.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
15.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). London: SAGE Publications.
WhittemoreR.KnaflK. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553.
18.
WolfZ. R. (2007). Ethnography: The method. In MunhallP. L. (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (4th ed., pp. 293-330). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
19.
WuestJ. (2007). Grounded theory. In MunhallP. L. (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (4th ed., pp. 239-271). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
