Baumann, S. L. (1998). Nursing: The missing ingredient in nurse practitioner education. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 89-90.
2.
Carpenito, L. J. (1999). Handbook of nursing diagnosis (8th ed.). New York: Lippincott.
3.
Cody, W. K. (1999). Middle-range theories: Do they foster the development of nursing science?Nursing Science Quarterly, 12, 9-14.
4.
Jacox, A. (1994). Toward the inclusiveness of scope in nursing diagnosis. In R. M. Carroll-Johnson & M. Paquette (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the tenth conference, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (pp. 17-26). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
5.
Jenny, J. (1995). Advancing the science of nursing. In M. J. Rantz & P. LeMone (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eleventh conference, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (pp. 73-81). Glendale, CA: CINAHL Information Systems.
6.
McCloskey, J. C. , & Bulechek, G. M. (Eds.). (2000). Nursing interventions classification (NIC) (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
7.
Parse, R. R. (1997). The language of nursing knowledge: Saying what we mean. In J. Fawcett & I. M. King (Eds.), The language of nursing theory and metatheory (pp. 73-77). Sigma Theta Tau Monograph.
8.
Rantz, M. J. , & LeMone, P. (Eds.). (1995). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eleventh conference, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Glendale, CA: CINAHL Information Systems.
