Allen, D. (1985). Nursing research and social contract alternative models of science that emphasize understanding and emancipation. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, XVII(2), 58-64.
2.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1989). A nursing theory of power for nursing practice: Derivation from Rogers’ paradigm. In J. Riehl-Sisca (Ed.), Conceptual models for nursing practice (3rd ed., pp. 207-217). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Lange.
3.
Bernstein, R. J. (1988). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
Chinn, P. L. (1985). Debunking myths in nursing theory and research. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, XVII(2),45-49.
5.
Cody, W. K. (1994a). Human values and the notion of normality: The use of power/knowledge in practice. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
Cody, W. K. (1994b). Nursing theory-guided practice: What it is and what it is not. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 144-145.
7.
Covey, S.R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people. New York: Simon & Schuster.
8.
Cull-Wilby, B. L. , & Pepin, J. L. (1987). Towards a coexistence of paradigms in nursing knowledge development. Journal of Advance Nursing, 12, 515-521.
9.
Edson, M. (1999). Wit. New York: Faber and Faber.
10.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB.
11.
Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
12.
Hall, B. A. , & Allen, J. D. (1986). Sharpening nursing’s focus by focusing on health. Journal of Nursing & Health Care, 7, 315-320.
13.
Johnson, J. L. (1991). Nursing science: Basic, applied, or practical? Implications for the art of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(1), 7-16.
14.
Kaas, M. J. , Dahl, D., Dehn, D., & Frank, K. (1998). Barriers to prescriptive practice for psychiatric/mental health clinical nurse specialists. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 12, 200-204.
15.
King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts, processes. Albany, NY: Delmar.
16.
King, I. M. (1992). King’s theory of goal attainment. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 19-26.
17.
Mitchell, G. J. (1995). The view of freedom within the human becoming theory. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research. New York: National League for Nursing Press.
18.
Mitchell, G. J. (1998). Living with diabetes: How understanding expands theory for professional practice. Canadian Journal of Diabetes Care, 22(1), 30-37.
19.
Mitchell, G. J. , & Cody, W. K. (1992). Nursing knowledge and human science: Ontological and epistemological considerations. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 54-61.
20.
Mitchell, G. J. , & Lawton, C. (2000). Living with the consequences of personal choices for persons with diabetes: Implications for educators and practitioners. Canadian Journal of Diabetes Care, 24(2), 23-30.
21.
Newman, M. A. , Sime, A. M., & Corcoran-Perry, S. A. (1991). The focus of the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(1), 1-6.
22.
Onions, C. T. (Ed.). (1987). The shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles (3rd ed., Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
23.
Orem, D. E. (1995). Nursing: Concepts of practice (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
24.
Packard, S. , & Polifroni, E. C. (1991). Dilemmas in nursing science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 4, 7-13.
25.
Parse, R. R. (1981). Man-living-health: A theory of nursing. New York: John Wiley.
26.
Parse, R. R. (1987). Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories and critiques. Philadelphia: Saunders.
27.
Parse, R. R. (1992a). Human becoming: Parse’s theory of nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 35-42.
28.
Parse, R. R. (1992b). The performing art of nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 147.
29.
Parse, R. R. (1995). The human becoming theory. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research. New York: The National League for Nursing Press.
30.
Parse, R. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Peplau, H. E. (1988). The art and science of nursing: Similarities, differences, and relationships. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 8-15.
32.
Polifroni, E. C. , & Packard, S. (1993). Psychological determinism and the evolving nursing paradigm. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 63-68.
33.
Tickle-Degnen, L. (2000). What is the best evidence to use in practice?The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 218-221.
34.
Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
Woods, E. C. (1994). King’s theory in practice with elders. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 65-67.
