The author critiques the current American Association of Colleges of Nursing definition of nursing scholarship for its lack of emphasis on building discipline-specific knowledge. The author defines nursing scholarship as scholarly activities and formal investigations designed to generate, synthesize, translate, apply, and disseminate discipline-specific knowledge that advances nursing’s societal commitments and responsibilities in promoting human health, human betterment, and wellbecoming. Nursing scholarship guided by disciplinary thinking consists of scholarship that is (a) informed by nursing philosophy; (b) framed within nursing’s metaparadigm concepts; (c) situated within a nursing paradigm; (d) conceptualized within a nursing conceptual framework or nursing midrange theory; and (e) focused on, depending on one’s paradigmatic and theoretical perspective, developing and testing concepts in nursing classification systems.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (1999). Position statement: Defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 15(6), 372–376. https://doi.org/10/1016/S8755-7223(99)80068-4
BenderM. (2018). Re-conceptualizing the nursing metaparadigm: Articulating the philosophical ontology of the nursing discipline that orients inquiry and practice. Nursing Inquiry, 25(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12243
7.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8.
BoyerE. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18–33. doi:10.2307/3824459
9.
BoyerE. L. (2016). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate (expanded ed.). Jossey-Bass.
10.
ButcherH. K. (2004). Nursing’s distinctive knowledge base. In HaynesL.ButcherH. K.BoeseT. (Eds.), Nursing in contemporary society: Issues, trends and transition into practice (pp. 71–103). Prentice Hall.
11.
ButcherH. K. (2011). Creating the nursing theory-research-practice nexus. In CowenP.MoorheadS. (Eds.), Current issues in nursing (8th ed., pp. 123–135). Mosby Elsevier.
12.
ButcherH. K. (2021). Commentary and book review ofMiddle range theories: Application to nursing research and practice (5th ed.), by PetersonSandra J.BedrowTimothy S. (2020). Nursing Science Quarterly, 4(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318421992031
13.
ButcherH. K. (2022). Unitary-caring science: A hermeneutic-phenomenological research method. Nursing Science Quarterly, 35(2), 148-159. https://doi.org./10.1177/08943184211070593
14.
ChinnP. L. (1994). Developing a method for aesthetic knowing in nursing. In ChinnP. L. (Ed.), Art and aesthetics in nursing (pp. 19–40). National League for Nursing
FawcettJ. (1978). The what of theory development. In FawcettJ. (Ed.), Theory development: What, why, how? (pp. 17–33). National League for Nursing.
20.
FawcettJ. (1999). The state of nursing science: Hallmarks of the 20th and 21st centuries. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12(4), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849901200411
21.
FawcettJ. (2000). The state of nursing science: Where is the nursing in the science?Theoria: Journal of Nursing Theory, 9(3), 3–10.
FawcettJ.DeSanto-MadeyaS. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (3rd ed.). F.A. Davis.
25.
GardnerH. (2006). Five minds for the future. Harvard Business School Press.
26.
GlassickC. E. (2000). Boyers expanded definition of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200009000-00007
27.
GraceP. J.WillisD. G.RoyC.JonesD. A. (2016). Profession at the crossroads: A dialog concerning the preparation of nursing scholars and leaders. Nursing Outlook, 64(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.10.002
JohnsonE.CarringtonJ. M. (2023). Revisiting the nursing metaparadigm: Acknowledging technology as foundational to progressing nursing knowledge. Nursing Inquiry, 30(1), e12502. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12502
30.
KrishnanA. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. Economic & Social Research Council.
31.
LambeP. K. (2007). Organising knowledge: Taxonomies, knowledge, and organizational effectiveness. Chandos.
MinerR. J.FlotteT. R.ThorndykeL. E. (2023). Defining scholarship for today and tomorrow. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 43(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000473
38.
MoorheadS.SwansonE.JohnsonM. (2024). Nursing outcome classification (NOC): Measurement of health outcomes. (7th ed). Elsevier.
PeplauH. E. (1987). Nursing science: A historical perspective. In ParseR. R. (Ed.), Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and critiques (pp. 13–29). Saunders.
49.
PetersonS. J.BedrowT. S. (2020). Middle range theories: Application to nursing research and practice (2nd ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
50.
PhillipsJ. (1997). Evolution of the science of unitary human beings. In MadridM. (Ed.), Patterns of Rogerian knowing (pp. 11–27). NLN.
51.
RawnsleyM. (1999). Polarities in nursing science: The plight of the emerging nurse scholar. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12(4), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849901200403
52.
RogersM. E. (1964). Reveille in nursing. FA Davis.
53.
SmithM. C. (1994). Arriving at a philosophy of nursing: Discovering? Constructing? Evolving? In KikuchiJ. F.SimmonsH. (Eds.), Developing a philosophy of nursing (pp. 43–60). Sage.
54.
SmithM. C. (2020). Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed.). F.A. Davis.
55.
SmithM. J.LiehrP. R.CarpenterR. D. (2024). Middle range theory for nursing. ( 5th ed.). Springer.
