Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The results of a recent survey of 140 randomly selected for-profit and nonprofit organizations covered in seven Maryland, Delaware, and District of Columbia newspapers, and field interviews with journalists and organizational respondents based on articles about those organizations, suggest that discrepancies in communication may result not only from reporting routines but also from the organization's own ideologies and structures governing work and communication. In organic organizations with values compatible with open communication, dependency relationships with journalists are more likely to form, and these appear to diminish claims of distorted reporting. Specifically, systematic discrepancies or differences between organizations and reporters on the salience, selection, and interpretation (accuracy, framing, and emphasis) of news reports were found to be more common for public sector (particularly government) mechanistic bureaucracies of large-sized (greater than 5,000 employees) than for private organizations having organic structures, and these organizations were the ones lacking open communication behaviors that foster dependency relationships.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken, M. , & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intraorganizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33, 912-930.

Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Blau, P. (1972). Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations. Social Science Research, 1, 1-24.

Blumler, J. , & Gurevitch, M. (1981). An essay on role relationships. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), A handbook of political communication (pp. 467-496). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Burns, T. , & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.

Child, J. (1977). Organization: A guide to problems and practice. London: Harper & Row.

Courtright, J. , Fairhurst, G. , & Rogers, E. (1989). Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 773-802.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Cummings, T. (1978). Self-regulating work group: A sociotechnical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 3, 625-634.

10.

Deal, T. E. , & Kennedy, A. E. (1982). Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

11.

Emery, F. , Marek, J. , & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32.

12.

Gandy, O. H. (1981). The economics of image building: The information subsidy in health. In E. McAnany , J. Schnitman , & N. Janus (Eds.), Communication and social structure: Critical studies in mass media research (pp. 204-239). New York: Praeger.

13.

Grunig, J. (1990). Theory and practice of interactive media relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 35, 18-23.

14.

Grunig, J. , & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

15.

Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley.

16.

Hage, J. , & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations. New York: Random House.

17.

Hall, R. (1982). Organizations: Structure and process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

18.

Kerlinger, F. N. , & Pedhazer, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

19.

Miller, D. , & Dorge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 539-560.

20.

Mills, P. (1983). Self-management: Its control and relationship to other organizational properties. Academy of Management Review, 8, 445-453.

21.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

22.

Pacanowsky, M. , & O'Donnell-Trujillo, B. (1983). Organizational communication as cultural performance. Communication Monographs, 50, 126-147.

23.

Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-209.

24.

Pfeffer, J. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

25.

Sriramesh, K. , Grunig, J. , & Buffington, J. (1992). Corporate culture and public relations. In J. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 577-596). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

26.

Stocking, H. , & LaMarca, N. (1990). How journalists describe their stories: Hypotheses and assumptions in newsmaking. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 295-301.

27.

Theus, K. (1988a). Organizational response to media reporting. Public Relations Review, 14, 45-57.

28.

Theus, K. (1988b). Discrepancy: Organizational response to media reporting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

29.

Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

30.

Warner, M. (Ed.). (1977). Choice and constraint. London: Halsted.

31.

Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

32.

Weick, K. (1987). Theorizing about organizational communication. In F. Jablin , L. Putnam , K. Roberts , & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

33.

Weick, K. , & Browning, L. (1986). Argument and narration in organizational communication. Journal of Management, 12, 243-259.

34.

Wilkins, A. (1983). The culture audit: A tool for understanding organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 24-39.

Organizations and the Media

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References