Managers vary in their sensitivity to the appropriateness of communication media, and this sensitivity has been associated with managerial performance. Factors affecting managerial variability in media sensitivity are relatively uninvestigated. This study examines two potential individual difference measures—communication apprehension and self-monitoring. Both measures are found to affect the media choices that managers make. The results, however, call into question the initial models of the media choice decisions of managers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, E. R. , Helms, M. M., & Curran, K. E. (1987). An information processing analysis of organization information adequacy/abundance. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 150-172.
2.
Anderson, L. R. , & Thacker, J. (1985). Self-monitoring and sex as related to assessment center ratings and job performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 345-361.
3.
Burgoon, J. K. , & Hale, J. L. (1983). A research note on the dimensions of communication reticence. Communication Quarterly, 31, 238-248.
4.
Caldwell, D. F. , & O'Reilly, C. A. (1982). Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 124-127.
5.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233.
6.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
7.
Daft, R. L. , Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). The relationship between message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information support systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-364.
8.
Daft, R. L. , & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 207-224.
9.
Daly, J. A. (1985). Writing apprehension. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 43-82). New York: Guilford.
10.
Daly, J. A. , & McCroskey, J. C. (1975). Occupational choice and desirability as a function of communication apprehension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 309-313.
11.
Daly, J. A. , & Miller, M. D. (1975a). Apprehension of writing as a predictor of message intensity. Journal of Psychology, 89, 175-177.
12.
Daly, J. A. , & Miller, M. D. (1975b). The empirical development of an instrument of writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 242-249.
13.
Daly, J. A. , & Shamo, W. (1976). Writing apprehension and occupational choice. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 49, 55-56.
14.
Daly, J. A. , & Shamo, W. (1978). Academic decisions as a function of writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 119-126.
15.
Daly, J. A. , Vangelisti, A. L., & Daughton, S. M. (1987). The nature and correlates of conversational sensitivity. Human Communication Research, 14, 167-202.
16.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
17.
Fulk, J. , & Ryu, D. (1990, June). Perceiving electronic mail systems: A partial test of social information processing model of communication media in organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dublin, Ireland.
18.
Fulk, J. , Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 529-552.
19.
Galbraith, J. (1977). Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Lennox, R. D. , & Wolfe, R. N. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349-1364.
21.
Markus, M. (1988, June). Information richness theory, managers, and electronic mail. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
22.
McCroskey, J. C. (1970). Measures of communication-bound anxiety. Speech Monographs, 37, 269-277.
23.
McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96.
24.
McCroskey, J. C. , & Anderson, J. F. (1976). The relationship between communication apprehension and academic achievement among college students. Human Communication Research, 3, 73-81.
25.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Penley, L. E. (1982). An investigation of the information processing framework of organizational communication. Human Communication Research, 8, 348-365.
28.
Perrow, C. A. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-208.
29.
Rice, R. E. , & Manross, G. (1986). The case of the intelligent telephone: The relationship of job category to the adoption of organizational communication technology. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 10, pp. 727-742). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Rosenthal, R. , Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Schultz, L. M. , & Meyers, G. D. (1981, March). Measuring writing apprehension in required freshman composition and upper-level writing courses. Paper presented at the meeting on College Composition and Communication, Dallas, TX.
32.
Scott, M. D. , McCroskey, J. C., & Sheahan, M. E. (1978). The development of a self-report measure of communication apprehension in organizational settings. Journal of Communication, 28, 104-111.
33.
Short, J. , Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
34.
Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
35.
Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 86-128). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Steinfeld, C. , & Fulk, J. (1986, August). Task demands and managers' use of communication media: An information processing view. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
37.
Sypher, B. D. , & Sypher, H. E. (1983). Perceptions of communication ability: Self-monitoring in an organizational setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 297-304.
38.
Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
39.
Trevino, L. K. , Lengel, R. H., Bodensteiner, W., & Gerloff, E. (1990). The richness imperative and cognitive style: The role of individual differences in media choice. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 176-197.
40.
Trevino, L. K. , Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
41.
Tushman, M. L. (1979). Impacts of perceived environmental variability on patterns of work related communication. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 482-500.
42.
Tushman, M. L. , & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3, 613-624.
43.
Van de Ven, A. , Delbecq, A., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination nodes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322-338.
44.
Weiner, A. N. (1973). Machiavellianism as a predictor of group interaction and cohesion. Unpublished master's thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
45.
Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
