Due to the digital media revolution, journalists have had to develop new communication norms for engaging with the public, beyond the work of research and reporting. Focusing on logics of communication design, we interviewed working journalists to learn how they navigated pressures and expectations for engaging with audiences. We found that participants’ justifications sometimes created zones of convergence between professional and market values. Other times, they used cautionary examples or extreme hypotheticals to reify professional boundaries. Regarding threats to safety, journalists invoked another form of logic: self-preservation. The study’s findings exemplify how collective communication design can engage competing logics and generate designs that accommodate fragmented interests. Such strategies may help distressed professions retain their legitimacy amid changing norms.
AakhusM.BzdakM. (2015). Stakeholder engagement as communication design practice. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1569
3.
AndrejevicM. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge.
4.
AustinJ. T.WallaceB. S.GilmoreB. N.BiselR. S. (2020). The micro-skills of collective communication design work: An academic team’s development of sensebreaking messages. Communication Studies, 71(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1722720
5.
BarbourJ. B.GillR.BargeJ. K. (2018). Organizational communication design logics: A theory of communicative intervention and collective communication design. Communication Theory, 28(3), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx005
6.
BarbourJ. B.JensenJ. T.CallS. R. (2024). Organizational communication design. In MillerV.PooleM. S. (Eds.), The de gruyter handbook of organizational communication theory and research (pp. 107–126). De Gruyter.
7.
BesbrisM.PetreC. (2020). Professionalizing contingency: How journalism schools adapt to deprofessionalization. Social Forces, 98(4), 1524–1547. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz094
8.
BossioD.SaccoV. (2017). From “selfies” to breaking tweets – how journalists negotiate personal and professional identity on social media. Journalism Practice, 11(5), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1175314
BrymanA. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
12.
CarlsonE. J.PooleM. S.LambertN. J.LammersJ. C. (2017). A study of organizational responses to dilemmas in interorganizational emergency management. Communication Research, 44(2), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215621775
13.
CarlsonM. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088
CheneyG. (2010). Just a job? Communication, ethics, and professional life. Oxford University Press.
16.
CheneyG.AshcraftK. L. (2007). Considering “the professional” in Communication Studies: Implications for theory and research within and beyond the boundaries of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 17(2), 146–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00290.x
17.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
18.
DeuzeM. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism (London), 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
19.
DoolinB. (2002). Enterprise discourse, professional identity, and the organizational control of hospital clinicians. Organization Studies, 23(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233003
20.
du GayP. (2004). Against ‘Enterprise’ (but not against ‘enterprise’, for that would make no sense). Organization, 11(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404039777
EkdaleB.TullyM.HarmsenS.SingerJ. (2015). Network within a culture of job insecurity – producing news amidst organizational and industry uncertainty. Journalism Practice, 9(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.963376
23.
GarciaM. A.BarbourJ. B. (2018). “Ask a professional—ask a librarian”: Librarianship and the chronic struggle for professional status. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(4), 565–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918776798
24.
HanitzschT.VosT. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive construction of journalism. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12112
25.
HellmuellerL.MelladoC. (2015). Professional roles and news construction: A media sociology conceptualization of journalists’ role conception and performance. Communications Society, 28(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.3.1-11
26.
HoltonA.LewisS.CoddingtonM. (2016). Interacting with audiences: Journalistic role conceptions, reciprocity, and perceptions about participation. Journalism Studies, 17(7), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1165139
27.
JensenJ. T.RolisonS. L.BarbourJ. B. (2022). Temporal dominance: Controlling activity cycles when time is scarce, sudden, and squeezed. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(1), 30–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211023471
28.
KovachB.RosensteilT. (2014). The elements of journalism: What news people should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.
29.
LammersJ. C. (2011). How institutions communicate: Institutional messages, institutional logics, and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 154–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910389280
30.
LammersJ. C.GarciaM. A. (2009). Exploring the concept of “profession” for organizational communication research: Institutional influences in a veterinary organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908327007
31.
LammersJ. C.GuthK. (2013). The institutionalization of corporate reputation. In CarrollC. (Ed.), The handbook of communication and corporate reputation (pp. 222–234). Wiley-Blackwell.
32.
LarsonG. S.GillR. (2017). Organizations and identity. Polity Press.
33.
LewisS. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
34.
LoughK.MolyneauxL.HoltonA. (2018). A clearer picture – journalistic identity practices in words and images on Twitter. Journalism Practice, 12(10), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1389292
ParkS.SangY.JungJ.StroudN. J. (2021). News engagement: The roles of technological affordance, emotion, and social endorsement. Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1981768
37.
PeacockC.ScaccoJ. M.Jomini StroudN. (2019). The deliberative influence of comment section structure. Journalism (London), 20(6), 752–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917711791
38.
PetreC. (2020). Engineering consent: How the design and marketing of newsroom analytics tools rationalize journalists’ labor. In CarlsonM. (Ed.), Measurable journalism: Digital platforms, news metrics and the quantified audience (pp. 121–139). Routledge.
PutnamL. L. (2019). Constituting order and disorder: Embracing tensions and contradictions. In VásquezC.KuhnT. (Eds.), Dis/organization as communication (pp. 17–35). Routledge.
41.
RamasubramanianS.SousaA. N.GonlinV. (2017). Facilitated difficult dialogues on racism: A goal-based approach. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382706
42.
RubinH.RubinI. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Sage.
43.
RussoT. (1998). Organizational and professional identification – a case of newspaper journalists. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 72–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318998121003
StroudN. J.Van DuynE. (2023). Curbing the decline of local news by building relationships with the audience. Journal of Communication, 73(5), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad018
