Universities and colleges are organizations that significantly impact students, their communities, and society. This forum explores how organizational communication scholars who are university leaders have applied their scholarly backgrounds to inform their roles. The forum participants engage in the work of being reflective practitioners to shed light on how organizational communication theory can help in negotiating the everyday lived experience of academic leadership. Three key issues are explored: (1) in what ways are organizational communication scholars uniquely positioned to assume a university leadership role? (2) how do communication concepts inform the communication practices of administrators? and (3) how do communication practices contribute to universities as multi-faceted institutions? The participants conclude by reflecting on current challenges in higher education and the potential of organizational communication scholars to play a vital role in navigating those challenges.
AlbuO. B.CnossenB.AbdallahC. (2024). Positionings: Toward a relational understanding of representation and writing in organizational communication research. In BrummansB. H. J. M.TaylorB. C.SivunenA. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication (pp. 569–588). Sage.
2.
AlbuO. B.CostasJ. (2018). Thrice-born and in-between? Exploring the différance between “at-home” ethnography and ethnography abroad. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 7(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-07-2018-073
3.
AllenB. J.TompkinsP. K. (1996). Vocabularies of motives in a crisis of academic leadership. Southern Journal of Communication, 61(4), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949609373028
4.
AllenD. (2001). Getting things done: The art of stress-free productivity. Penguin Books.
5.
AshforthB. E.SchinoffB. S. (2016). Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062322
6.
AustinJ. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.
7.
BallardD.AllenB.AshcraftK.GaneshS.McLeodP.ZollerH. (2020). When words do not matter: Identifying actions to effect diversity, equity, and inclusion in the academy. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(4), 590–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920951643
8.
BaxterL. A. (1993). “Talking things through”; and “putting it in writing”: Two codes of communication in an academic institution. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889309365376
9.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
10.
BlanchardK. (2003). Servant leader. Thomas Nelson.
BrummansB. H.HwangJ. M. (2018). Home is what we make it: Hybridity as an alternative for spatial metaphors in at-home ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 7(2), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-12-2017-0065
14.
BrummansB. H. J. M.TaylorB. C.SivunenA. (2024). Introduction: Toward a methodological lingua franca for qualitative research in organizational communication. In BrummansB. H. J. M.TaylorB. C.SivunenA. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication (pp. 30–45). Sage.
15.
CarbaughD. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in American scenes. State University of New York Press.
16.
CastorT. (2018). Climate risks as organizational problems: Constructing agency and action. Peter Lang.
17.
CastorT. (2022). The umbrella of discourse analysis and its role in CCO. In BasqueJ.BencherkiN.KuhnT. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the communicative constitution of organization (pp. 197–212). Routledge.
18.
CastorT. (2024). Approaches to qualitative research on the communicative constitution of organizations. In BrummansB. H. J. M.TaylorB. C.SivunenA. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication (pp. 103–121). Sage.
19.
CastorT.BartesaghiM. (2021). Deciding. In CoorenF.Stücheli-HerlachP. (Eds.), Handbook of management communication (Vol. 16, pp. 69–85). Walter de Gruyter Mouton.
20.
CastorT.CoorenF. (2006). Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 570–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905284764
21.
CastorT. R. (2005). Constructing social reality in organizational decision making: Account vocabularies in a diversity discussion. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318904273689
22.
ConnollyM.JamesC.FertigM. (2019). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745880
23.
ConradC. (1985). Chrysanthemums and swords: A reading of contemporary organizational communication theory and research. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50(3), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372631
DanielsR. J. (2021). What universities owe democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
DoshiV.TurnerP. K.VohraN. (2021). Challenging the discourse of leadership as knowledge: Knowing and not knowing. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920950462
27.
EadieW. F. (2011). Stories we tell: Fragmentation and convergence in communication disciplinary history. Review of Communication, 11(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2011.578257
28.
EisenbergE. (2001). Building a mystery: Toward a new theory of communication and identity. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/51.3.534
29.
EisenbergE.JohnsonZ.PietersonW. (2015). Leveraging social networks for strategic success. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414560283
EisenbergE. M.MurphyA.AndrewsL. (1998). Openness and decision making in the search for a university provost. Communications Monographs, 65(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376432
32.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/14.1.5
GarciaG. A.RamirezJ. J. (2018). Institutional agents at a Hispanic serving institution: Using social capital to empower students. Urban Education, 53(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915623341
35.
GirouxH. A.PennaA. N. (1979). Social education in the classroom: The dynamics of the hidden curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 7(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1979.10506048
36.
Goldrick-RabS. (2016). Paying the price: College costs, financial aid, and the betrayal of the American dream. University of Chicago Press.
37.
GreenhalghL.ChapmanD. I. (1995). Joint decision making: The inseparability of relationships and negotiation. In KramerR. M.MessickD. M. (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process: New trends in theory and research (pp. 166–185). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345369.n8
LawS. F.LeA. T. (2023). A systematic review of empirical studies on trust between universities and society. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2176598
MarchJ. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Simon and Schuster.
43.
MilburnT. (2009). Nonprofit organizations: Creating membership through communication. Hampton.
44.
MillsC. E.CoorenF. (Eds.), (2018). Discursivity, relationality and materiality in the life of the organisation: Communication perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351203876
45.
PalM.KimH.HarrisK. L.LongZ.LinabaryJ.Wilhoit LarsonE.JensenP. R.Gist-MackeyA. N.McDonaldJ.Nieto-FernandezB.JiangJ.MisraS.DempseyS. E. (2022). Decolonizing organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(3), 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221090255
46.
ParkerM. (2020). The critical business school and the university: A case study of resistance and co-optation. Critical Sociology, 47(7–8), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520950387
PeräkyläA. (2004). Conversation analysis. In SealeC.SilvermanD.GubriumJ.GoboG. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 165–179). Sage.
49.
PutnamL.CoorenF. (2004). Alternative perspectives on the role of text and agency in constituting organizations. Organization, 11(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041995
50.
RubenB. D.GigliottiR. A. (2017). Communication: Sine qua non of organizational leadership theory and practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675447
51.
RyleG. (1949). The concept of mind. University of Chicago.
52.
SampleS. (2003). The contrarian’s guide to leadership. Jossey-Bass.
53.
SchoenebornD.BlaschkeS.CoorenF.McPheeR. D.SeidlD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 285–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914527000
54.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
55.
Shockley-ZalabakP.MorrealeS. (2011). Communication and the high trust organization. In GillisT. (Ed.), The IABC handbook of organizational communication: A guide to internal communication, public relations, marketing, and leadership (pp. 41–53). Jossey-Bass.
56.
Shockley-ZalabakP.MorrealeS.HackmanM. (2010). Building the high-trust organization: Strategies for supporting five key dimensions of trust. Jossey-Bass.
57.
ShotterJ. (1993). Cultural politics of everyday life: Social constructionism, rhetoric and knowing of the third kind. University of Toronto Press.
58.
ShotterJ. (2011). Getting it: Withness-thinking and the dialogical … in practice. Hampton.
59.
TracyK.DimockA. (2004). Meetings: Discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. Annals of the International Communication Association, 28(1), 127–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2004.11679034
60.
TracyK.EisenbergE. (1990). Giving criticism: A multiple goals case study. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24(1–4), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389332
ViramontesA.CastorT. (2023). Identity and community among first-generation students: High-impact practices and communicating belonging throughout department design. In ZilvinskisJ.KinzieJ.DadayJ.O'DonnellK.Vande ZandeC. (Eds.), Delivering on the promise of high-impact practices (pp. 135–146). Routledge.
63.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
