‘What do you do?’ is a stereotypical networking question. How professionals answer acquaintancing questions like this when first meeting sheds light on how identity is construed. Using data from a naturally occurring networking event for elite professional services in Hong Kong, this paper uses a close study of interaction and follow-up interviews to identify and examine proximal networking mechanisms and processes. Consistently, participants used some amalgam of emblems, things that convey a social persona, from four different categories: industry (e.g., finance), professional role (e.g., FX trader), organizational affiliation (e.g., Morgan Stanley), and hierarchical position (e.g., associate). These generate evaluations of projected/absent instrumental gain, holistic eliteness, ‘interestingness’, and social proficiency (based on how they are deployed), resulting in symbolic capital transforming into (un)realized and projectible material outcomes. Theoretically, these findings contribute to our understanding of networking mechanisms. Practically, they can improve self-presentation, inform organizations of exclusionary effects, and enhance networking strategies.
AlvessonM.Lee AshcraftK.ThomasR. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084426
AshforthB. E.HarrisonS. H.CorleyK. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
5.
AshforthB. E.JohnsonS. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (Eds), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800530
BallardD.AllenB.AshcraftK.GaneshS.McLeodP.ZollerH. (2020). When words do not matter: Identifying actions to effect diversity, equity, and inclusion in the academy. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(4), 590–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920951643
BensaouB. M.GalunicC.Jonczyk-SédèsC. (2014). Players and purists: Networking strategies and agency of service professionals. Organization Science, 25(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0826
10.
BhojrajS.LeeC. M.OlerD. K. (2003). What’s my line? A comparison of industry classification schemes for capital market research. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 745–774. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-679X.2003.00122.x
11.
BourdieuP.NiceR. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of class. Harvard University Press
12.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In HarréR.LangenhoveL. V. (Eds), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–52). Wiley.
DownS.ReveleyJ. (2009). Between narration and interaction: Situating first-line supervisor identity work. Human Relations, 62(3), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101043
15.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517–554. https://doi.org/10.5465/256405
16.
EmpsonL. F. (1998). Mergers between professional services firms: How the distinctive organisational characteristics influence the process of value creation [PhD Thesis]. University of London1998.
17.
FettermanD. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-Step (3rd ed.). Sage.
18.
FrandsenS. (2012). Organizational image, identification, and cynical distance: Prestigious professionals in a low-prestige organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(3), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912438692
19.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–266). University of Chicago Press.
20.
GibsonC.H Hardy IIIJ.Ronald BuckleyM. (2014). Understanding the role of networking in organizations. Career Development International, 19(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2013-0111
21.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
22.
GoffmanE. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. Basic Books.
23.
GreenwaldH. P. (2007). Organizations: Management without control. Sage.
24.
HortonK. E.McClellandC. R.GriffinM. A. (2014). Defined by our hierarchy? How hierarchical positions shape our identifications and well-being at work. Human Relations, 67(10), 1167–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713516374
HugginsR. (2009). Forms of network resource: Knowledge access and the role of inter-firm networks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00266.x
JonesA.SinS. (2018). Achieving professional trustworthiness: Communicative expertise and identity work in professional accounting practice. In C. N. Candlin, & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of trust (pp. 151–166). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29556-9
29.
KaiserK. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350879
KrippendorffK. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
32.
KruegerA. B.SummersL. H. (1988). Efficiency wages and the inter-industry wage structure. Econometrica, 56(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911072
33.
KuwabaraK.HildebrandC. A.ZouX. (2018). Lay theories of networking: How laypeople’s beliefs about networks affect their attitudes toward and engagement in instrumental networking. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0076
34.
LevyS. (2013). The internship. 20th Century Studios.
35.
MaynardD. W.ZimmermanD. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(4), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033633
36.
MeyerJ. P.BeckerT. E.Van DickR. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.383
37.
MichaelJ.YuklG. (1993). Managerial level and subunit function as determinants of networking behavior in organizations. Group and Organization Management, 18(3), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601193183005
RiveraL. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412463213
43.
ShahN. P.ParkerA.WaldstrømC. (2017). Examining the overlap: Individual performance benefits of multiplex relationships. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916647528
SirrisS. (2019). Coherent identities and roles? Hybrid professional managers’ prioritizing of coexisting institutional logics in differing contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(4), 101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101063
46.
SvennevigJ. (1999) Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions (vol. 64). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.64
47.
ThomasJ. (2014). Activity types versus speech events. In JaworskiA.CouplandN. (Eds), The discourse reader (pp. 168–171). Routledge.
48.
ThurlowC.JaworskiA. (2017). The discursive production and maintenance of class privilege: Permeable geographies, slippery rhetorics. Discourse and Society, 28(5), 535–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517713778
49.
VissaB. (2012). Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organization Science, 23(2), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0567
50.
WanbergC. R.van HooftE. A. J.LiuS.CsillagB. (2020). Can job seekers achieve more through networking? The role of networking intensity, self-efficacy, and proximal benefits. Personnel Psychology, 73(4), 559–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12380
51.
WingenderL. M.WolffH. G. (2023). The dark and bright side of networking behavior: Three studies on short-term processes of networking behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 140, 103811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103811
52.
XuH.YuZ.GuoB.TengM.XiongH. (2018). Extracting job title hierarchy from career trajectories: A bayesian perspective. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh international joint conference on artificial intelligence. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 3599–3605. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/500
