Based on the action research model of inquiry, this article is an interpretive ethnographic case study, exploring the power of narratives as a sensemaking device for members of a women's resource network in a large corporation during a time of significant organizational change, and the influence of storytelling on the networking practices of its members. Data are based on participant observation, formal and informal interviews, focus groups, and document analysis, including presentations, meeting notes, and e-mail correspondence. Drawing on the concepts of sensemaking, identity construction, and habitus, analysis of the members' stories suggests three key conclusions: reliance on collectively constructing stories; use of stories to deal with ambiguity and anxiety; and use of stories to construct and regulate identity. When viewed through a narrative lens, these results illuminate the interconnection of storytelling and networking strategies in a women's resource network that provides a hybrid of both expressive and instrumental benefits.
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139-158.
2.
Albrecht, T., Irey, K., & Mundy, A. (1982). Integration in communication networks as a mediator of stress: The case of a protective services agency. Social Work, 27, 229-235.
3.
Aldrich, H. (1989). Networking among women entrepreneurs. In O. Hagan, C. Rivchun, & D. Sexton (Eds.), Women-owned businesses (pp. 103-132). New York: Praeger.
4.
Alvesson, M. (1994). Talking in organizations: Managing identity and impressions in an advertising agency. Organizational Studies , 15, 535-563.
5.
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Benhabib, S. (1999). Sexual difference and collective identities: The new global constellation. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24, 335-361.
7.
Blau, P.M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
8.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action . Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
9.
Bois, S.J. (1996). The art of awareness: A handbook on epistemics and general semantics (4th ed.). Santa Monica: Continuum Press and Productions.
10.
Boje, D.M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly,36, 106-126.
11.
Boje, D.M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as Tamara-Land. Academy of Management Journal , 38, 997-1035.
12.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Bourdieu, P. (1981). Men and machines. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 304-317). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14.
Bowen, G.L. (1998). Effects on leader support in the work unit on the relationship between work spillover and family adaptation. Journal of Family andEconomic Issues, 19, 25-52.
15.
Brass, D.J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327-343.
16.
Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795-817.
17.
Browning, L.D. (1991). Organizational narratives and organizational structure . Journal of Organizational Change Management, 4, 59-67.
18.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Cohen, C., & Tyson, D. (2002). Teaching blind men to see the elephant: Using narrative in assessment and change management. Knowledge Directions,3, 66-75.
21.
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Denning, S. (2002). The narrative lens: Storytelling in 21st century organizations. Knowledge Directions,3, 92-101.
23.
Edwards, J.R., & Rothbard, N.P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs . Academy of Management Review, 25, 178-199.
24.
Ezzy, D. (1998). Theorizing narrative identity: Symbolic interactionism and hermeneutics. Sociological Quarterly, 39, 239-249.
25.
Feldman, S. (1990). Stories as cultural creativity: On the relation between symbolism and politics in organizational change. Human Relations, 43, 809-828.
26.
Ferguson, D.E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
Fernandez, J.P. (1981). Racism and sexism in corporate life. Lexington, MA: Heath.
28.
Fineman, S. (Ed.). (2000). Emotions in organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Fisher, W.R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
31.
Fisher, W.R. (1989). Clarifying the narrative paradigm. Communication Monographs, 56, 55-58.
32.
Gadamer, H. (1975). Truth and method. New York : Seabury.
33.
Gephart, R.P., Jr. (1991). Succession sensemaking and organizational change: A story of a deviant college president. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 4, 35-44.
34.
Gergen, K.J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Gergen, K.J., & Gergen, M.M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 17-56). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
37.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
38.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
39.
Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited . In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Greenwood, D.J., & Levin, M. (2003). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 131-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women's ways of leadership . New York: Doubleday.
42.
Hofstede, G. (1994). Uncommon sense about organizations: Cases, studies and field observations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly,37, 422-447.
44.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
45.
Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91-102.
46.
Jameson, D.A. (2001). Narrative discourse and management action. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 477-511.
47.
Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
48.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.567-606). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
50.
Lather, P. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 525-545.
51.
Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365-385.
52.
Lincoln, J.R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly,24, 181-199.
53.
Loden, M. (1985). Feminine leadership. New York : Times Books.
54.
Louis, M.R. (1980). Surprise and sense-making: What newcomers experience when entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly,23, 225-251.
55.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
56.
Marsden, P.V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 57-76.
57.
Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
58.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Mergenthaler, E. (1996). Emotion-abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing psychotherapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1306-1315.
60.
Moch, M. (1980). Job involvement, internal motivation and employees' integration into networks of work relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 15-31.
61.
Morrison, A.M., & Von Glinow, M.A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.
62.
Mumby, D.K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63.
Rentz, K.C. (1999). What can we learn from a sample of one? The role of narrative in case study research. In J. Perkins & N. Blyler (Eds.), Narrative and professional communication, ATTW contemporary studies in technical communication (pp. 37-62). Stamford, CT: Ablex .
64.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
65.
Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative, (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
Robichaud, D., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J.R. (2004). The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Academy of Management Review , 29, 617-634.
67.
Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.
68.
Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
69.
Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L., & Liden, R.C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-237.
70.
Smith, F.L., & Keyton, J. (2001). Organizational storytelling: Metaphors for relational power and identity struggles. Management Communication Quarterly , 15, 149-182.
71.
Tannen, D. (1994). Talking 9 to 5. Women and men in the workplace: Language, sex and power. New York: Avon Books.
72.
Taylor, J.R., & Van Every, E.J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73.
Turner, G. (1999). Film as social practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
74.
Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/ family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 50, 749-761.
75.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
76.
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
Weick, K.E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
78.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. The Systems Thinker, 9. Retrieved March 15, 2005, from http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledgegarden/cop/lss.shtml
79.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
80.
Wilkins, A. (1984). The creation of company cultures: The role of stories and human resource systems. Human Resource Management , 23, 41-60.
81.
Woodilla, J. (1998). Workplace conversations: The text of organizing . In D. Grant, T. Keenoy, & C. Oswick (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 31-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
