This article explores the discourse of nonprofit wrongdoing through a thematic analysis of over 450 texts, including media coverage and organizational responses, surrounding four cases of nonprofit wrongdoing. These cases include theft, mismanagement of funds, lying about 9/11, and administering unintentional yet lethal doses of medication. The findings extend prior work on organizational rhetoric and propose the notion of granted utility – an assumed foundational view of the usefulness and underlying benefit of nonprofit organizations – as key for understanding nonprofit rhetoric. The findings suggest that recognizing granted utility allows organizations to focus on answering responsibility-focused questions of organizational legitimacy while maintaining utility-focused messages that reinforce granted utility when wrongdoing occurs.
9/11 survivor account questioned. (2007, September 27). The Associated Press State & Local Wire.
2.
A northern Kentucky minister pleaded guilty Thursday to federal charges of falsifying a loan application and tax evasion. (2005, October 6). The Associated Press State & Local Wire.
BarrouquereB. (2005, June 8). Cold Spring minister indicted for misusing $800,000 in funds. The Associated Press State & Local Wire.
5.
BekkersR. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in The Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003258102
6.
BenoitW. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. SUNY Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972).
BoydJ. (2004). Organizational rhetoric doomed to fail: R.J. Reynolds and the principle of the oxymoron. Western Journal of Communication, 68(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310409374788
10.
BrinsonS. L.BenoitW. L. (1999). The tarnished star: Restoring Texaco’s damaged public image. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(4), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318999124001
11.
BurkeK. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. University of California Press.
12.
BurkeKenneth (1970). The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkely and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
13.
BurkeK. (1984). Attitudes toward history. University of California Press. (Original work published 1937).
14.
ClairR. P. (1993). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs, 60(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376304
15.
ClairR. P.AndersonL. B. (2013). Portrayals of the poor on the cusp of capitalism: Promotional materials in the case of Heifer International. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913502773
16.
CoombsW. T (1992). The failure of the task force on food assistance: A case study of the role of legitimacy in issue management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0402_03
17.
CoombsW. T (2006). Crisis management: A communicative approach. In BotanC. H.HazletonV. (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 171–197). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
DowlingJ.PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
19.
DunlapD. W.KovaleskiS. F.SchweberN. (2007, September 27). In a 9/11 survival tale, the pieces just don’t fit. The New York Times, p. A1.
20.
ElersP.DuttaM. J.ElersS. (2021). Engagement and the nonprofit organization: Voices from the margins. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(3), 368–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211001883
21.
Fussell SiscoH. (2012a). The ACORN story: An analysis of crisis response strategies in a nonprofit organization. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.001
22.
Fussell SiscoH. (2012b). Nonprofit in crisis: An examination of the applicability of situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.582207
23.
Fussell SiscoH.CollinsE.L.ZochL.M. (2010). Through the looking glass: A decade of red Cross crisis response and situational crisis communication theory. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.018
24.
GaneshS. (2003). Organizational narcissism: Technology, legitimacy, and identity in an Indian NGO. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 558–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318903252539
25.
GibelmanM.GelmanS. R. (2004). A loss of credibility: Patterns of wrongdoing among nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas, 15(4), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-004-1237-7
26.
GillR.WellsC. C. (2014). Welcome to the “Hunger Games”: An exploration of the rhetorical construction of legitimacy for one U.S.-based nonprofit organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913513434
27.
HansmannH. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901. https://doi.org/10.2307/796089
28.
Head of 9/11 charity asked to resign(2007, September 28).Philanthropy Today.
29.
HearitK. M. (1995). Mistakes were made: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy. Communication Studies, 46(1–2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368435
30.
HurstJ.W. (1970). The legitimacy of the business corporation in the law of the United States 1780–1970. The University Press of Virginia.
31.
IRS (2016). Nonprofit charitable organizations and donor-advised funds, 2012. Statistics of Income Bulletin. www.irs.gov/taxstats
32.
Jones-BodieA. (2020). Methodist Hospital’s rhetoric of atonement: Examining an organization’s responses to NICU overdoses. Communication Studies, 71(4), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1749682
33.
KoschmannM. A. (2012). Developing a communicative theory of the nonprofit. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423640
34.
LewisL. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 238–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905279190
35.
LewisL. K.HamelS. A.RichardsonB. K. (2001). Communicating change to nonprofit stakeholders: Models and predictors of implementers’ approaches. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318901151001
36.
LewisL. K.RichardsonB. K.HamelS A. (2003). When the “stakes” are communicative: The lamb’s and the lion’s share during nonprofit planned change. Human Communication Research, 29(3), 400–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00845.x
37.
LongZ. (2016). Managing legitimacy crisis for state-owned non-profit organization: A case study of the red Cross society of China. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.011
38.
LovejoyK.WatersR.D.SaxtonG.D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
39.
MaierC.CristJ. R. (2017). From “wicked crisis” to responsive witness: Jean-luc marion and the American Roman Catholic sexual-abuse scandal. Southern Communication Journal, 82(3), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2017.1315453
40.
McKeeverB. W. (2013). From awareness to advocacy: Understanding nonprofit communication, participation, and support. Journal of Public Relations, 25(4), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2013.806868
41.
MeisenbachR.J.FeldnerS. B. (2011). Adopting an attitude of wisdom in organizational rhetorical theory and practice: Contemplating the ideal and the real. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911409548
42.
MeisenbachR.J.McMillanJ.J. (2006). Blurring the boundaries: Historical developments and future directions in organizational rhetoric. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 99–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2006.11679056
43.
MeisenbachR. J.RickJ. M.BrandhorstJ. (2019). Managing occupational identity threats and job turnover: How former and current fundraisers manage moments of stigmatized identities. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21332
OwenW.F. (1985). Thematic metaphors in relational communication: A conceptual framework. Western Journal of Communication, 49(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318509374177
51.
PerelmanC.Olbrechts-TytecaL. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958).
52.
PetersonB. L.McNameeL. G. (2021). Special issue introduction on nonprofit and voluntary organizations: Questions and possibilities for the next era. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(3), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211017535
53.
PressgroveG.N.McKeeverB.W. (2016). Nonprofit relationship management: Extending the organization-public relationship to loyalty and behaviors. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(3-4), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1233106
54.
PressgroveG.N.McKeeverB.W.JangS.M. (2016). What is contagious? Exploring why content goes viral on twitter: A case study of the ALS Ice Bucket challenge. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(1), Article e1586. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1586
55.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
56.
SalamonL. M. (2012). America’s nonprofit sector: A primer (3rd ed.). The Foundation Center.
57.
SaxtonG.D.NiyiroraJ.N.GuoC.WatersR.D. (2015). #AdvocatingForChange: The strategic use of hashtags in social media advocacy. Advances in Social Work, 16(1), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.18060/17952
58.
SmithJ. M.ArendtC.LahmanJ. B.SettleG. N.DuffA. (2006). Framing the work of art: Spirituality and career discourse in the nonprofit sector. Communication Studies, 57(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970500481672
59.
TiernonA. M. (2007, February 15). Baby James: Surviving a medical mistake. [Television broadcast]. WTHR.
WatersR.D.BurnettE.LammA.LucasJ. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
62.
WiggillM. N. (2014). Communicating for organizational legitimacy: The case of the Potchefstroom fire protection association. Public Relations Review, 40(2), 315–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.10.007
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
