Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Urban scholars suggest that communication can be key to equity advocacy and organizing for social justice in cities, but a gap exists in studies grounded in communication theory. This article theorizes everyday urban equity advocacy through communication infrastructure theory (CIT), an ecological framework grounded in the notion that communities are discursively constructed. Sourced from 34 semi-structured interviews in Chicago, this article examines how organizers from social change-focused organizations activate community storytelling network actors (residents, community organizations, and local media) to advocate for equity. I find that organizers activate this network to cultivate consciousness, build capacity, and amplify equity work for marginalized communities. The study is important in demonstrating how advocating for equity is best when it is an intentional process that activates multi-stakeholder engagement in urban neighborhoods year-round.

Keywords

communication infrastructure organizational communication community organizing equity social justice activism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2010). The new Jim crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

Alinsky

(1971). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Vintage Books.

Allen

(2011). Difference matters: Communicating social identity (2nd ed.). Waveland Press.

Anderson

L. B.

(2020). Exploring the role of communication in the aging in place xperience: A quasi-ethnographic account of a local community. Communication Monographs, 87(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1728562

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

Kim

Y. C.

Matei

(2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 392–428. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F009365001028004003

Bell

(1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. Basic Books.

Belongie

Silverman

R. M.

(2018). Model CBAs and community benefits ordinances as tools for negotiating equitable development: Three critical cases. Journal of Community Practice, 26(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2018.1476427

Benjamin

(2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.

Benner

Pastor

(2015). Equity, growth, and community: What the nation can learn from America's metro areas. University of California Press.

10.

Betancur

Smith

(2016). Claiming neighborhood: New ways of understanding urban Change. University of Illinois Press.

11.

Broad

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

Ognyanova

Stokes

Picasso

Villanueva

(2013). Understanding communication ecologies to bridge communication research and community action. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.844848

12.

Broadfoot

Munshi

(2007). Diverse voices and alternative rationalities: Imagining forms of postcolonial organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0893318907306037

13.

Carragee

K. M.

Frey

L. R.

(2016). Communication activism research: Engaged communication scholarship for social justice. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3975–3999. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6004

14.

Chen

N. T. N.

Dong

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

Parks

Huang

(2012). Building a new media platform for local storytelling and civic engagement in ethnically diverse neighborhoods. New Media & Society, 14(6), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444811435640

15.

Cruz

(2017). Invisibility and visibility in alternative organizing: A communicative and cultural model. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 614–639. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0893318917725202

16.

Cruz

J. M.

Sodeke

C. U.

(2021). Debunking eurocentrism in organizational communication theory: Marginality and liquidities in postcolonial contexts. Communication Theory, 31(3), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz038

17.

Dempsey

S. E.

Parker

P. S.

Krone

K. J.

(2011). Navigating socio-spatial difference, constructing counter-space: Insights from transnational feminist praxis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2011.569973

18.

Dutta

M. J.

(2011). Communicating social change: Structure, culture and agency. Routledge.

19.

Fainstein

S. S.

(2010). The just city. Cornell University Press.

20.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.

21.

Frey

L. R.

Pearce

W. B.

Pollock

Artz

Murphy

(1996). Looking for justice in all the wrong places: On a communication approach to social justice. Communication Studies, 47(1–2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368467

22.

Friedland

L. A.

(2001). Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community. Communication Research, 28(4), 358–391. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F009365001028004002

23.

Grimes

Parker

(2009). Magining organizational communication as a decolonizing project: In conversation with Broadfoot, Munshi, Mumby, and stohl. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0893318908327010

24.

Habermas

(1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press.

25.

Harvey

(2005). Spaces of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development (Vol 8). Franz Steiner Verlag.

26.

Joseph

R. L.

(2017). What’s the difference with “difference”? Equity, communication, and the politics of difference. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3306–3326. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6443

27.

Jung

J. Y.

Toriumi

Mizukoshi

(2013). Neighborhood storytelling networks, internet connectedness, and civic participation after the great east Japan Earthquake. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(6), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.819930

28.

Kim

Y. C.

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

(2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x

29.

Kim

C.Y.

Shin

Cho

Jung

Shon

Shim

. (2015). SNS dependency and community engagement in urban Neighborhoods: The moderating role of integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network. Communication Research, 46(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650215588786

30.

Knapp

C. E.

(2018). Constructing the dynamo of Dixie: Race, urban planning, and cosmopolitanism in Chattanooga. University of North Carolina Press.

31.

Krumholz

(2018). Introduction. In Krumholz

Hexter

K.W.

(Eds.), Advancing equity planning now (pp. 1–20). Cornell University Press.

32.

Kvale

Brinkmann

(2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.

33.

Linabary

J. R.

Cruz

J. M.

Allen

B. J.

Chalupa

J. A.

Dempsey

S. E.

Glenn

C. L.

Harris

K. L.

Long

McDonald

Musleh

Oktaviani

F. H.

Parker

P. S.

Sobande

(2021). Envisioning more equitable and just futures: Feminist organizational communication in theory and praxis. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(1), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0893318920973598

34.

Marcuse

Connolly

Novy

Olivo

Potter

Steil

(Eds.), (2009). Searching for the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice. Routledge.

35.

Matsaganis

M. D.

Katz

V. S.

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

(2010). Understanding ethnic media: Producers, consumers, and societies. Sage.

36.

McLeod

J. M.

Kosicki

McLeod

D. M.

(2009). Levels of analysis and communication science. In Berger

C. R.

Roloff

M. E.

Ewoldsen

D. R.

(Eds), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 183–200). Sage.

37.

Noble

(2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: University Press.

38.

Ognyanova

Chen

N.-T. N.

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

Son

Parks

Gerson

(2013). Online participation in a community context: Civic engagement and connections to local communication resources. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2433–2456. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2287.

39.

Pal

Buzzanell

P. M.

(2013). Breaking the myth of Indian call centers: A postcolonial analysis of resistance. Communication Monographs, 80(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.776172

40.

Parker

(2014). Difference and organizing. In Putnam

Mumby

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 619–641). Sage.

41.

Parker

P. S.

(2020). Ella baker's catalytic leadership: A primer on community engagement and communication for social justice. University of California Press.

42.

Reardon

Forester

(2018). The future of equity planning education in the United States. In Krumholz

Hexter

K. W.

(Eds.), Advancing equity planning now (pp. 227–242). Cornell University Press.

43.

Saito

(2019). Urban development and the growth with equity framework: The national football league stadium in downtown Los Angeles. Urban Affairs Review, 55(5), 1370–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1078087417751216

44.

Shah

D. V.

McLeod

J. M.

Yoon

S.-H.

(2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast and internet influence. Communication Research, 28(4), 464–506. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F009365001028004005

45.

Smith

(1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. Psychology Press.

46.

Stein

(2019). The housing crisis and the rise of the real estate state. New Labor Forum, 28(3), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1095796019864098

47.

Stokes

Villanueva

Bar

Ball-Rokeach

(2015). Mobile design as neighborhood acupuncture: Activating the storytelling networks of south L.A. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(3), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1040292

48.

Stone

C. N.

(2005). Looking back to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40(3), 309–341. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1078087404270646

49.

Tracy

S. J.

(2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

50.

Villanueva

(2021). Promoting urban social justice through engaged communication scholarship: Reimagining place. Routledge.

51.

Villanueva

Broad

Gonzalez

Ball-Rokeach

Murphy

(2016). Communication asset mapping: An ecological field application toward building healthy communities. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2704–2724. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5335.

52.

Villanueva

Gonzalez

Son

Moreno

Liu

Ball-Rokeach

(2017). Bringing local voices into community revitalization: Engaged communication research in urban planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382711

53.

Waisbord

(2019). The communication manifesto. John Wiley & Sons.

54.

Wenzel

Gerson

Moreno

Son

Morrison Hawkins

(2017). Engaging stigmatized communities through solutions journalism: Residents of south Los Angeles respond. Journalism, 19(5), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884917703125

55.

Wilkin

H. A.

Stringer

K. A.

O’Quin

Montgomery

S. A.

Hunt

(2011). Using communication infrastructure theory to formulate a strategy to locate “hard-to-reach” research participants. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(51), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2011.556140

56.

Wolfson

(2014). Digital rebellion: The birth of the cyber left. University of Illinois Press.

57.

Woods

(1998). Rethinking elites: Networks, space, and local politics. Environment and Planning A, 30(12), 2101–2119. https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fa302101

Storytelling Networks that Build Community Power: Urban Equity Advocacy From a Communication Infrastructure Lens

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References