Organizational communication theory and research tends to assume the practices of organizational “members” are relevant to the study of organizational phenomena, without reflecting on how those members were identified in the first place. This issue is particularly relevant to perspectives that view communication as constitutive of organizations because they may take the very object they seek to explain—the organization—as the starting point when identifying pertinent informants. We provide a communicational perspective of organizational membership by starting from communicative events, instead of individuals. Ethnomethodology’s notions of accounts and sanctions are useful in recognizing the interactionally performed nature of membership. We extend ethnomethodology’s intuition by viewing membership—which we reframe as contributorship—as being achieved through the contribution of actions to the organization.
AhrneG.BrunssonN. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21, 429-449.
2.
AinsworthS.HardyC. (2008). The enterprising self: An unsuitable job for an older worker. Organization, 15, 389-405. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408088536
3.
AshcraftK. L.KuhnT. R.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1-64. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047186
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
5.
BarleyS. R.KundaG. (2004). Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in a knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BencherkiN.CoorenF. (2011). To have or not to be: The possessive constitution of organization. Human Relations, 64, 1579-1607. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711424227
7.
Benoit-BarnéC.CoorenF. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 5-31. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335414
8.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BrannickT.CoghlanD. (2007). In defense of being “native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 59-74.
10.
BrummansB. H. J. M. (2006). The Montréal school and the question of agency. In CoorenF.TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 197-211). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
BrummansB. H. J. M. (2007). Death by document: Tracing the agency of a text. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 711-727.
12.
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
ButlerC. W.FitzgeraldR. (2010). Membership-in-action: Operative identities in a family meal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2462-2474. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.006
14.
CallonM. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In LawJ. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223). London, England: Routledge.
15.
CastorT.CoorenF. (2006). Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 570-600. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905284764
16.
ChaputM.BrummansB. H. J. M.CoorenF. (2011). The role of organizational identification in the communicative constitution of an organization: A study of consubstantialization in a young political party. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 252-282. Retrieved form http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910386719
17.
CheneyG. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390174
18.
CoorenF. (2004a). The communicative achievement of collective minding: Analysis of board meeting excerpts. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 517-551. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318903262242
19.
CoorenF. (2004b). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373-393.
20.
CoorenF. (Ed.) (2007). Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
CoorenF. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, ventriloquism and incarnation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
22.
CoorenF.FairhurstG. T. (2008). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.), The communicative constitution of organization: Centering organizational communication (pp. 117-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
CoorenF.FoxS.RobichaudD.TalihN. (2005). Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements. Time & Society, 14, 265-282.
24.
DavisF. (1973). The Martian and the convert: Ontological polarities in social research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 2, 333-343. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/089124167300200305
25.
DeleuzeG. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.
26.
DerridaJ. (1991). L’autre cap; suivi de La démocratie ajournée. Paris, France: Editions de Minuit.
GaneshS.McAllumK. (2012). Volunteering and professionalization: Trends in tension?Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 152-158. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423762
29.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
31.
GoodallH. L. (2000). Writing the new ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
32.
GossettL. M. (2006). Falling between the cracks: Control and communication challenges of a temporary workforce. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 376-415. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905280327
33.
HaveP. T. (2002). The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/834
34.
HeaphyE. D. (2013). Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organization Science, 24, 1291-1315. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0798
35.
HendersonA.CheneyG.WeaverC. K. (2015). The role of employee identification and organizational identity in strategic communication and organizational issues management about genetic modification. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 12-41. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414560278
36.
HoggM. A.ReidS. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7-30. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
37.
HuxhamC.VangenS. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Human Relations, 53, 771-806. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536002
38.
HylmöA. (2006). Telecommuting and the contestability of choice: Employee strategies to legitimize personal decisions to work in a preferred location. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 541-569. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905284762
39.
JeffersonG. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In LernerG. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
40.
KingB. G.FelinT.WhettenD. A. (2010). Perspective—Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21, 290-305. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0443
41.
KoschmannM. A. (2013). The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 61-89. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912449314
42.
KuhnT.NelsonN. (2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 5-38. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161001
43.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
LatourB. (2008). What is the style of matters of concern?Assen, The Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum.
45.
LawrenceT. B. (2004). Rituals and resistance: Membership dynamics in professional fields. Human Relations, 57, 115-143. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704042924
McAllumK. (2014). Meanings of organizational volunteering diverse volunteer pathways. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 84-110. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913517237
48.
McNameeL. G.PetersonB. L. (2014). Reconciling “third space/place” toward a complementary dialectical understanding of volunteer management. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 214-243. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914525472
49.
McPheeR. D.IversonJ. (2009). Agents of constitution in Communidad: Constitutive processes of communication in organization. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 49-87). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
McPheeR. D.ZaugP. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1-2). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/010/1/01017.html
51.
MeisenbachR. J.KramerM. W. (2014). Exploring nested identities voluntary membership, social category identity, and identification in a community choir. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 187-213. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914524059
52.
MunroR. (1999). Power and discretion: Membership work in the time of technology. Organization, 6, 429-450. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/135050849963004
53.
OsborneS. P.FlynnN. (1997). Strategic alliances managing the innovative capacity of voluntary and non-profit organizations in the provision of public services. Public Money & Management, 17(4), 31-39. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00089
54.
PrattM. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493.
55.
PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
RamanS. (2001). Offshored workers or new intellectuals? Emerging from the great labour divide in university research. Organization, 8, 441-447. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/1350508401082029
57.
RichardsonL. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In LincolnY. S.DenzinN. K. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
SchoenebornD.BlaschkeS.CoorenF.McPheeR. D.SeidlD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 285-316. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914527000
59.
SchoenebornD.SchererA. G. (2012). Clandestine organizations, Al Qaeda, and the paradox of (in)visibility: A response to Stohl and Stohl. Organization Studies, 33, 963-971. Retrieved form http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612448031
60.
ScottC. R.CormanS. R.CheneyG. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00223.x
61.
SimondonG. (2005). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble, France: Jérôme Millon.
62.
StohlC.StohlM. (2011). Secret agencies: The communicative constitution of a clandestine organization. Organization Studies, 32, 1197-1215. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410839
TaylorJ. R.FlanaginA. J.CheneyG.SeiboldD. R. (2001). Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. Communication Yearbook, 24, 99-138.
65.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2011). The situated organization: Studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2014). When organization fails: Why authority matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Van MaanenJ. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539-550.
70.
Van MaanenJ. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133-143.
71.
van VuurenM.CoorenF. (2010). “My attitude made me do it”: Considering the agency of attitudes. Human Studies, 33, 85-101. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-010-9137-x
72.
VásquezC. (2013). Spacing organization: Or how to be here and there at the same time. In RobichaudD.CoorenF. (Eds.), Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency and discourse (pp. 127-149). New York, NY: Routledge.
73.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
WrightC. (2009). Inside out? Organizational membership, ambiguity and the ambivalent identity of the internal consultant. British Journal of Management, 20, 309-322. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00585.x
