When corporations are confronted with a crisis, well-crafted CEO apologies can serve to repair, restore, and rebuild a damaged corporate image. In prior research, the use of linguistic resources exhibited in CEO corporate apology discourse for different crisis response strategies has not been sufficiently examined. Drawing on the appraisal framework and subsumed linguistic resources, this study analyzed the discursive construction of crisis response strategies in the corporate apology discourse of leading companies listed in the Fortune Global 2000. The findings revealed an integrated use of crisis response strategies in which attitude appraisal resources predominated, while different types of appraisal resources were deployed in various crisis response strategies to achieve rhetorical persuasion in corporate communication. The proposed framework integrating crisis response strategies in CEO apology discourse with appraisal resources could guide CEOs and crisis communicators to use the right words when composing corporate apologies.
AfifiW. A. (2007). Nonverbal communication. In WhaleyB. B.SamterW. (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 39–62). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
AustinL.JinY. (2018). Social media and crisis communication. Routledge.
3.
BarnettM. L.JermierJ. M.LaffertyB. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012
4.
BenoitW. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. State University of New York Press.
5.
BenoitW. L. (2015). Accounts, excuses, apologies: Image repair theory and research (2nd ed.). State University of New York Press.
6.
BenoitW. L. (2018). Crisis and image repair at United Airlines: Fly the unfriendly skies. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 1(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.30658/jicrcr.1.1.2
7.
BentleyJ. M. (2018). What counts as an apology? Exploring stakeholder perceptions in a hypothetical organizational crisis. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(2), 202–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917722635
8.
Blum-KulkaS.LevenstonE. A. (1987). Lexical-grammatical pragmatic indicators. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000450
9.
CoombsW. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “Appropriate” crisis response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318995008004003
10.
CoombsW. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
11.
CoombsW. T. (2010). Pursuing evidence-based crisis communication. In CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 719–725). Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233
13.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2005). An exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crises. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 1(5), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1746-9791(05)01111-9
14.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2008). Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 34(3), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.04.001
15.
DeStenoD.PettyR.RuckerD.WegenerD.BravermanJ. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.43
16.
EricksonB.LindE. A.JohnsonB. C.O’BarrW. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90015-X
17.
FediukT. A.PaceK. M.BoteroI. C. (2011). Crisis response effectiveness: Methodological considerations for advancement in empirical investigation into response impact. In CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 221–242). John Wiley & Sons.
18.
GoffmanE. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth.
19.
HallgrenK. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
20.
HallidayM. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
21.
HearitK. M. (2006). Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing. Routledge.
22.
HoldenerM.KauffmanJ. (2014). Getting out of the doghouse: The image repair strategies of Michael Vick. Public Relations Review, 40(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.006
23.
KiambiD. M.ShaferA. (2016). Corporate crisis communication: Examining the interplay of reputation and crisis response strategies. Mass Communication and Society, 19(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1066013
24.
KoehnD.GoranovaM. (2018). Do investors see value in ethically sound CEO apologies? Investigating stock market reaction to CEO apologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3301-9
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
27.
LazareA. (2005). On apology. Oxford University Press.
28.
LewisJ. T.ParraG. R.CohenR. (2015). Apologies in close relationships: A review of theory and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12060
29.
MaL.ZhanM. (2016). Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1166367
30.
MartinJ.WhiteP. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
NekmatE.GowerK.YeL. (2014). Status of image management research in public relations: A cross-disciplinary content analysis of studies published between 1991 and 2011. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 8(4), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2014.907575
32.
NgaiC. S. B.JinY. (2016). The effectiveness of crisis communication strategies on Sina Weibo in relation to Chinese publics’ acceptance of these strategies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(4), 451–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651916651907
33.
OgiermannE. (2009). On apologising in negative and positive politeness cultures. John Benjamins.
34.
PaceK. M.FediukT. A.BoteroI. C. (2010). The acceptance of responsibility and expressions of regret in organizational apologies after a transgression. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(4), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011085510
35.
RundquistS. (2007). Apologies: form and function: I think it was your foot I was stepping on. In HedbergN.ZacharskiR. (Eds.), The grammar-pragmatics interface (pp. 293–312). John Benjamins.
Ten BrinkeL.AdamsG. S. (2015). Saving face? When emotion displays during public apologies mitigate damage to organizational performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.05.003
38.
TurkJ. V.JinY.StewartS.KimJ.HippleJ. R. (2012). Examining the interplay of an organization’s prior reputation, CEO’s visibility, and immediate response to a crisis. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.012
39.
WorthingtonE. L. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
