BiselR. S. (2017). Organizational moral learning: A communication approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
CheneyG.McMillanJ. J. (1990). Organizational rhetoric and the practice of criticism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 93-114.
3.
ChristiansC. G. (2008). On the need and requirements for a global ethic of communication. In CiprutJ. V. (Ed.), Ethics, politics, and democracy: From primordial principles to prospective practices (pp. 293-318). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
CrableR. E. (1990). “Organizational rhetoric” as the fourth great system: Theoretical, critical, and pragmatic implications. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 115-128.
5.
DeetzS. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
DeetzS. (2003). Corporate governance, communication, and getting social values into the decisional chain. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 606-611. doi:10.1177/0893318902250236
7.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
9.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
HamlinJ. K.WynnK.BloomP. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557-559.
12.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21-37. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X
13.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
McPheeR. D. (2015). Agency and the four flows. Management Communication Quarterly, 29, 487-492. doi:10.1177/0893318915584826
15.
McPheeR. D.IversonJ. (2009). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 21-47). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
MeisenbachR. J. (2006). Habermas’s discourse ethics and principle of universalization as a moral framework for organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 39-62. doi:10.1177/0893318906288277
17.
MeisenbachR. J.CruzD. (in press). On a Mission: Promoting ethical intelligence and decision-making in nonprofit organizational practice. In GarrettE. (Ed.), Communication ethics as a loving struggle: Struggles in philosophy, family, and organizational communication. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
18.
PlaisanceP. L. (2009). Media ethics: Key principles for responsible practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
ReddingW. C. (1996). Ethics and the study of organizational communication: When will we wake up? In JaksaJ. A.PritchardM. S. (Eds.), Responsible communication: Ethical issues in business, industry, and the professions (pp. 17-40). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
20.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. V. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.