When employees enter organizations, they bring their life experiences with them, and those experiences may influence their organizational identification. The current study provides evidence for how Scott, Corman, and Cheney’s perspective on situated identification explains varying degrees of organization identification before and after newcomer orientation. Using a pretest, posttest survey design, these findings suggest that identification is changed by attending new employee orientation. Furthermore, prior non-work-related experiences with the hiring organization are explained as a type of membership negotiation that influences preorientation identification. The interaction effects are further examined to advance a more comprehensive view of how newcomers both individualize and adapt during new employee orientation and the role that multiple personal exposures to the organization can have.
AshforthB. E.HarrisonS. H.CorleyK. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325-374.
2.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
3.
AshforthB. E.SaksA. M. (1996). Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 148-178.
4.
BartelC. A. (2001). Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 379-413.
BullisC.BachB. W. (1989). Socialization turning points: An examination of change in organizational identification. Western Journal of Speech communication, 53, 273-293.
7.
BullisC.TompkinsP. (1989). The forest ranger revisited: A study of control practices and identification. Communication Monographs, 56, 287-306.
8.
BurgessJ.ConnellJ. (2006). Temporary work and human resources management: Issues, challenges and responses. Personnel Review, 35, 239-140.
9.
CarbaughD. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany: State University of New York.
10.
CarmeliA.GilatG.WaldmanD. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 972-992.
11.
CheneyG. (1982). Identification as process and product: A field study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
12.
CheneyG. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143-158.
13.
DukerichJ. M.GoldenB. R.ShortellS. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507-533.
14.
FlanaginA. J.WaldeckJ. H. (2004). Technology use and organizational newcomer socialization. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 137-165.
15.
FriedrichR. G. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 797-833.
16.
GatesL. R.HellwegS. A. (1989, February). The socializing function of new employee orientation programs: A study of organizational identification and job satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, Spokane, WA.
17.
GibsonM. K.PapaM. J. (2000). The mud, the blood, and the beer guys: Organizational osmosis in blue-collar work groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(1), 68-88.
18.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
GossettL. M. (2002). Kept at arm’s length: Questioning the organizational desirability of member identification. Communication Monographs, 69, 385-404.
20.
GossettL. M. (2006). Falling between the cracks: Control and communication challenges of a temporary workforce. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 376-415.
21.
Industry report. (2000). Training, 37, 45-48.
22.
JablinF. M. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory research, and methods (pp. 679-740). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
JablinF. M.KramerM. W. (1998). Communication-related sense-making and adjustment during job transfers. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 155-182.
24.
KleinH. J.WeaverN. A. (2000). The effectiveness of an organizational-level orientation training program in the socialization of new hires. Personnel Psychology, 53, 47-66.
25.
KuhnT.NelsonN. (2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(5), 5-38.
26.
LarsonG. S.PepperG. L. (2003). Strategies for managing multiple organizational identifications: A case of competing identities. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 528-557.
27.
LouisM. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
28.
MaelF. A.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
29.
MaelF. A.AshforthB. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309-333.
30.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
MillerV. D.JablinF. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the practices. Academy of Management Review, 16, 92-120.
32.
MorganJ. M.ReynoldsC. M.NelsonT. J.JohanningmeierA. R.GriffinM.AndradeP. (2004). Tales from the fields: Sources of employee identification in agribusiness. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 360-395.
33.
MyersK. K. (2005). A burning desire: Assimilation into a fire department. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 344-384.
34.
PorterL. W.SteersR. M.MowdayR. T.BoulianP. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
35.
PrattM. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PrattM. G.RockK. W.KaufmannJ. B. (2001). Making sense of socialization: How multiple social identities shape members’ experiences of work. Academy of Management Proceedings, A1-A6.
37.
PribbleP. T. (1990). Making an ethical commitment: A rhetorical case study of organizational socialization. Communication Quarterly, 38, 255-267.
38.
RousseauD. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217-233.
39.
RussoT. C. (1998). Organizational and professional identification: A case of newspaper journalists. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 72-111.
40.
SassJ. S.CanaryD. J. (1991). Organizational commitment and identification: An examination of conceptual and operational convergence. Western Journal of Communication, 55, 275-293.
41.
ScottC. R.ConnaughtonS. L.Diaz-SaenzH. R.MaguireK.RamirezR.RichardsonB.. . . MorganD. (1999). The impacts of communication and multiple identifications on intent to leave: A multimethodological exploration. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 400-435.
42.
ScottC. R.CormanS. R.CheneyG. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
43.
ScottC. R.FontenotJ. C. (1999). Multiple identifications during team meetings: A Comparison of conventional and computer-supported interactions. Communication Reports, 12(2), 91-100.
44.
ScottC. R.StephensK. K. (2009). It depends on who you’re talking to . . .: Predictors and outcomes of situated measures of organizational identification. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 370-394.
45.
ScottC. W.MyersK. K. (2010). Toward an integrative theoretical perspective on organizational membership negotiations: Socialization, assimilation, and the duality of structure. Communication Theory, 20, 79-105.
46.
Van DickR.ChristO.StellmacherJ.WagnerU.AhlswedeO.GrubbaC.. . . TissingtonP. A. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15, 351-360.
47.
Van MaanenJ.ScheinE. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209-264.
48.
VaughnM. A. (1997). Organizational identification strategies and values in high technology industries: A rhetorical-organizational approach to the analysis of socialization processes in corporate discourse. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(2), 119-139.
49.
WaldeckJ. H.MyersK. K. (2007). Organizational assimilation theory, research, and implications for multiple areas of the discipline: A state of the art review. In BeckC. S. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 31 (pp. 322-367). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
WanousJ. P. (1976). Organizational entry: From naïve expectations to realistic beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 22-29.
