In a globalized world, place may play a much larger role in shaping occupational identities than scholars realize. Rather than serving as mere context in which identity work is conducted, cities, states, and regions are highly influential in shaping various parts of identity. This study of high-tech entrepreneurs in a city in the Rocky Mountain West of the United States shows that place was significant for framing identity narratives related to occupation. In addition, place helped to frame and organize other discursive resources for identity work such as gender, class, and race. This study highlights the ways in which attention to place can (a) surface important contemporary discursive resources for identity work, (b) allow scholars to see how aspects of complex identities are organized, and (c) show how the material, geographic world shapes the ways in which people socially construct their identities.
AlvessonM.AshcraftK. L.ThomasR. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15, 5-28.
2.
AshcraftK. L. (2007). Appreciating the “work” of discourse: Occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots. Discourse & Communication, 1, 9-36.
3.
AshcraftK. L.MumbyD. K. (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
CarloneD.TaylorB. (1998). Organizational communication and cultural studies. Communication Theory, 8, 337-367.
5.
CheneyG.AshcraftK. L. (2007). Considering ‘‘the professional’’ in communication studies: Implications for theory and research within and beyond the boundaries of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 17, 146-175.
6.
CohenL.MussonG. (2000). Entrepreneurial identities: Reflections from two case studies. Organization, 7, 31-48.
7.
du GayP.SalamanG. (1992). The cult[ure] of the customer. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 615-633.
8.
ElsbachK. D. (2003). Relating physical environment to self-categorizations: Identity threat and affirmation in a non-territorial office space. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 622-654.
9.
ElsbachK. D.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Defining who you are by what you’re not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organization Science, 12, 393-415.
10.
ElsbachK. D.PrattM. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. In WalshJ. P.BriefA. P. (Eds.), The Academy of Management Annals (pp. 181-224). London, UK: Routledge.
11.
FloridaR. (2007). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
12.
FloridaR. (2008). Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where you live the most important decision of your life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
FournierV. (1998). Stories of development and exploitation: Militant voices in an enterprise culture. Organization, 5, 55-80.
14.
FriedmanT. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
15.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
GierynT. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review Sociology, 26, 463-496.
18.
GiniA. (2000). My job, my self: Work and the creation of the modern individual. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
GranovetterM. S. (1976). Network sampling: Some first steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287-1303.
20.
HalfordS.LeonardP. (2006). Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27, 657-676.
21.
HarréR.SecordP. F. (1973). The explanation of social behavior. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams.
22.
HarterL. M. (2004). Masculinity(s), the agrarian frontier myth, and cooperative ways of organizing: Contradictions and tensions in the experience and enactment of democracy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 89-118.
23.
KondoD. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
KuhnT. R. (2006). A “demented work ethic” and a “lifestyle firm”: Discourse, identity, and workplace time commitments. Organization Studies, 27, 1339-1358.
25.
KuhnT. R. (2009). Positioning lawyers: Discursive resources, professional ethics, and identification. Organization, 16, 681-704.
26.
KuhnT. R. (2011). Matters of communication: Political, cultural and technological challenges. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
27.
KuhnT. R.NelsonN. (2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 5-38.
28.
LarsonG. S.PepperG. L. (2003). Strategies for managing multiple organizational identifications: A case of competing identities. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 528-557.
29.
LimerickP. N. (1987). The legacy of conquest: The unbroken past of the American West. New York, NY: Norton.
30.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
ManganA. (2009) ‘We’re not banks’: Exploring self-discipline, subjectivity and co-operative work. Human Relations, 62, 93-117.
32.
MeisenbachR. J. (2008). Working with tensions: Materiality, discourse, and (dis)empowerment in occupational identity negotiation among higher education fundraisers. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 258-287.
MumbyD. K. (1998). Organizing men: Power, discourse, and the social construction of masculinity(s) in the workplace. Communication Theory, 8, 164-183.
35.
PepperG. L. (2008). The physical organization as equivocal message. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 318-338.
36.
Pitt-CatsouphesM.KossekE. E.SweetS. (2006). Charting new territory: Advancing multi-disciplinary perspectives, methods, and approaches in the study of work and family. In Pitt-CatsouphesM.KossekE. E.SweetS. (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
ProshanskyH. M.FabianA. K.KaminoffR. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
38.
RooneyD.PaulsenN.CallanV. J.BrabantM.GalloisC.JonesE. (2010). A new role for place identity in managing organizational change. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 44-73.
SaxenianA. (1996). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
SpencerC. (2005). Place attachment, place identity, and the development of the child’s self-identity: Searching the literature to develop a hypothesis. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14, 305-309.
42.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
TompkinsP. K.CheneyG. (1983). Account analysis of organizations: Decision making and identification. In PutnamL.PacanowskyM. (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp.123-146). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
44.
TurnerF. J. (1928). The frontier in American history. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
45.
Twigger-RossC. L.UzzellD. L. (1996). Place and identity process. Environmental Psychology, 16, 205-220.
46.
WheatonB. (2004). Introduction: Mapping the lifestyle sport-scape. In WeatonB. (Ed.), Understanding lifestyle sport: Consumption, identity, and difference. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
WhyteW. H. (1956). The organization man. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
