BargeJ. K.Shockley-ZalabakP. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 251-265.
2.
BastidaE. M.TsengT.McKeeverC.JackL. (2010). Ethics and community-based participatory research: Perspectives from the field. Health Promotion Practice, 11, 16-20.
3.
BidwellD. (2009). Is community-based participatory research postnormal science?Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34, 741-761.
4.
FrumkinP. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
IsraelB. A.SchulzE. A.ParkerE.BeckerA. B. (2001). Community-based participatory research: Policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Education for Health, 14(2), 189-197.
6.
LawlerE. E.MohrmanA. M.Jr.MohrmanS. A.LedfordG. E.Jr.CummingsT. G. (1985). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
7.
LewisL. K. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and a research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 238-267.
8.
McKelveyB. (2006). Response: Van de Ven and Johnson’s “engaged scholarship”: Nice try, but . . .Academy of Management Review, 31, 822-829.
9.
StoeckerR. (2009). Are we talking the walk of community-based research?Action Research, 7, 385-404.
10.
Van de VenA. H.JohnsonP. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802-821.
11.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.