AldrichH.HerkerD. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2, 217-230.
2.
BartelC. A. (2001). Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 379-414.
3.
BorkerM.de ManA.WeedaP. (2004). Embedding alliance competence: Alliance offices. In StrikwerdaH.van der ZeeJ. T. M. (Eds.), Fostering execution: How to leverage leadership in a confused business environment (pp. 84-90). De Meern, Netherlands: Nolan Norton.
4.
FosterM. K.MeinhardA. G. (2002). A regression model explaining predisposition to collaborate. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 549-564.
5.
HardyC.LawrenceT. B.GrantD. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30, 58-77.
6.
HardyC.LawrenceT.PhillipsN. (1998). Talking action: Conversations, narrative and action in interorganizational collaboration. In GrantD.KeenoyT.OswickC. (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 65-83). London, UK: SAGE.
7.
HarterL. (2004). Masculinities, the agrarian frontier myth, and cooperative ways of organizing: Contradictions and tensions in the experience and enactment of democracy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 89-118.
8.
HeathR. L.FreyL. R. (2004). Ideal collaboration: A conceptual framework of community collaboration. In KalbfleischP. J. (Ed.), Communication yearbook24 (pp. 189-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
HughesJ.WeissJ. (2007). Simple rules for making alliances work. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 122-131.
JonesT. S.BodtkerA. (1998). A dialectical analysis of a social justice process: International collaboration in South Africa. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 357-373.
12.
KeytonJ.FordD. J.SmithF. L. (2008). A meso-level communicative model of collaboration. Communication Theory, 18, 376-406.
13.
LawrenceT. B.PhillipsN.HardyC. (1999). Watching whale watching: Exploring the discursive foundations of collaborative relationships. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 479-502.
14.
LewisL. K. (2006). Collaborative interaction: Review of communication scholarship and a research agenda. In BeckC. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 30 (pp. 197-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
ScottC. R. (2007). Communication and social identity theory: Existing and potential connections in organizational identification research. Communication Studies, 58, 123-138.
16.
StohlC.WalkerK. (2002). A bona fide perspective for the future of groups: Understanding collaborating groups. In FreyL. R. (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 237-252). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
TakahashiL. M.SmutnyG. (2002). Collaborative windows and organizational governance: Exploring the formation and demise of social service partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 165-185.
18.
WilenskyH. L. (1967). Organizational intelligence: Knowledge and policy in government and industry. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
WilliamsP. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80, 103-124.
20.
WoodD. J.GrayB. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.
21.
WuichetP. A. (2000). How resources affect and stimulate collaboration. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 28, 67-84.