The author explores how the corporate discourse of “the business case” works to frame, restrict, and depoliticize the discussion of gender in the workplace. In turn, bemused and surprised by the ease with which women have been persuaded it is not “businesslike” to complain, the author explores how women’s linguistic choices shape their corporate lives. By examining the didactic and embedded “gender work” of a women’s leadership event and reflecting on her own, occasional, weakness for the discourse, the author contributes to the understanding of how a seemingly positive and popular communication strategy reproduces unequal gendered relationships in the workplace. The author rejects the claim that using a business case discourse is an effective strategy in improving the recognition, promotion, and rewarding of women in organizations.
Ahl, H. ( 2004). The scientific reproduction of gender inequality. Malmo, Sweden: Copenhagen Business School Press.
2.
Ahmed, S. ( 2006). The non-performativity of anti-racism. Merideans: Journal of Women, Race and Culture, 7(1), 104-126.
3.
Ahmed, S. ( 2007). "You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing": Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 590-609.
4.
Ahmed, S., Hunter, S., Kilic, S., & Turner, L. ( 2006). Final report: Integrating diversity, gender, race and leadership in the learning and skills sector. Lancaster, UK: Centre for Excellence in Leadership, Lancaster University.
5.
Ashcraft, K.L., & Mumby, D. ( 2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Baxter, J. ( 2003). Positioning gender in discourse. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Baxter, J., & Wright, E.O. ( 2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society , 14, 275-294.
8.
Blackmore, J. ( 2006). Deconstructing diversity discourses in the field of educational management and leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34, 181-199.
9.
Business Link. (2007). What is a "business case"? Retrieved September 19, 2007, from http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1074421939
10.
Colling, T., & Dickens, L. ( 1998). Selling the case for gender equality: Deregulation and equality bargaining. British Journal of Industrial Relations , 36, 389-411.
11.
Deetz, S.A. ( 1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonisation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
Dickens, L. ( 2006). Re-regulation for gender equality: From "either/or" to "both." Industrial Relations Journal, 37, 299-309.
13.
Di Maggio, P., & Powell, W. ( 1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
14.
Edelman, L., Riggs Fuller, S., & Mara-Drita, I. (2001). Diversity rhetoric and managerialization of the law. American Journal of Sociology , 106, 1589-1641.
15.
Fairhurst, G. ( 2007). Discursive leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Graafland, J., & Van der Ven, B. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 111-123.
17.
Greene, A.-M., Kirton, G., & Wrench, J. ( 2005). Trade union perspectives on diversity management: A comparison of the UK and Denmark. European Journal of Industrial Relations , 11, 179-196.
18.
Heracleous, L. ( 2006). A tale of three discourses: The dominant, the strategic and the marginalized. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1059-1087.
19.
Holmer-Nadesan, M. ( 1996). Organizational identity and space of action. Organization Studies, 17, 49-81.
20.
Hunter, S., & Swan, E. ( 2007). The politics of equality: Professionals, states and activists . Equal Opportunities International, 26, 377-386.
21.
Hutchings, E., & Thomas, H. ( 2005). The business case for equality and diversity: A UK case study of private consultancy and race equality. Planning, Practice and Research, 20, 263-278.
22.
Joutsenvirta, M. ( 2009). A language perspective to environmental management and corporate responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment , 18, 240-253.
23.
Kirby, E., & Harter, L. ( 2001). Discourses of diversity and the quality of work life: The character and costs of the managerial metaphor. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 121-127.
24.
Kirby, E., & Harter, L. ( 2003). Speaking the language of the bottom-line: The metaphor of "managing diversity." Journal of Business Communication , 40, 28-49.
25.
Lair, D., Sullivan, K., & Cheney, G. ( 2005). Marketization and the recasting of the professional self . Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 307-343.
26.
Mumby, D., & Stohl, C. ( 1991). Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse & Society, 2, 313-332.
27.
O’Leary, B., & Weathington, B. (2006). Beyond the business case for diversity in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18, 283-292.
28.
Simmons, J. ( 2004). Managing in the post-managerialist era: Towards socially responsible corporate governance. Management Decision, 42, 601-611.
29.
Smithson, J., & Stokoe, E. ( 2005). Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating "gender-blind" terms in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 147-168.
30.
Swan, E., & Gattrell, C. ( 2008). Gender and diversity in management. London: Sage.
31.
Tracy, S., & Trethewey, A. ( 2005). Fracturing the real-self-fake-self dichotomy: Moving towards "crystalized" organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 15, 168-195.
32.
Wilkins, D. ( 2004). From "separate is inherently unequal" to "diversity is good for business": The rise of market-based diversity arguments and the fate of the lack corporate bar. Harvard Law Review, 117, 1548-1615.
33.
Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. ( 2003). Deconstructing difference: The rhetoric of human resources managers’ diversity discourses. Organization Studies , 25, 55-74.
